Activision is greedy!

Post » Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:03 pm

This will not work. The reason I don't think it will work is because if it would, MS would have done this already with thier Halo seires. They havn't done it, and don't plan to do it with Halo Reach.

If activision does try this, then it will be the death of CoD because they will not be getting the sales as they did before. This is not World of Warcraft where people will pay for an MMO each month. It might work for the first 3-6 months, but after that, it will die and then the next CoD will not even be a blip on the rader screen I believe.

Again why pay for something when you can get it for free? Then again, we have all these idiots who pay for itunes, so maybe this Activision CEO is onto something. We already have millions of people paying for music wich they use to get for free. So what do we know? He is rich really rich, and what are we? Not close to him in the money scale that is for shure.
User avatar
Mistress trades Melissa
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:28 pm

Post » Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:09 pm

Why, that is the whole point. See, Valve aren't monsters, and neither are Activision. However, you want to depict Activision as evil overlords while you are quite ready to excuse even worse conduct from Valve simply because you like them better.

I don't recall where I ever said anyone was evil or not.

But I certainly have [censored] good reasons to like Valve better. Its not a simple reason, and its not as if Activision are some scape goats. I mentioned before that both have some bad business practices, the differences are how much and how bad, and that's where Activision shines.

Am I not entitled to like one company more than another, especially for WELL DEFINED REASONS that I've given?
User avatar
Mélida Brunet
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 2:45 am

Post » Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:36 pm

Finis
User avatar
DAVId MArtInez
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:16 am

Previous

Return to Othor Games