M'aiq's Dilemma

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 11:42 pm

That was done in Fallout 3. If you attacked a children it would run but it could never be killed or knocked unconscious. But yes, adding children with these roles would be cool. But the immersion always decrease when you have them to be immortal.

But someone will end up modding the game and getting rid of the essential tag for them.

@Shades: Funny, I felt more immersed in Oblivion where it had no children then in Fallout 3. I outlook them, they are just annoying...
That's because real children are annoying. It seems obvious. :P
User avatar
Sophie Morrell
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:13 am

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 6:31 am

I wouldn't mind them not being in the game, personally.
User avatar
Dalia
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:29 pm

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 7:43 pm

I wouldn't mind them not being in the game, personally.

It's just like anything, really. Do we want levitation to make a return? It would appear so, judging from the threads. Will we make due with the game even if we can't levitate? You bet your behind we will.
User avatar
Brad Johnson
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 7:19 pm

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 10:32 am

Well really, if we can remove classes of people from games because we don't prefer them, I say we remove Imperials. Screw those guys.
User avatar
Lori Joe
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:10 am

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 2:32 am

Children add so much to the game, I was happy to see them in Fallout and hope Bethesda adds them to TES: V.
User avatar
Jeff Turner
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:35 pm

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 10:16 pm

The thing about deer, though, is that they are game animals in our world. Generally, we only shoot bucks/stags and shooting does is illegal. They're more vital to more deer populating the world, the bucks are there just for their sperm. I did find it odd that we could shoot does in Oblivion without any backlash from the citizens.

Dagon crushed the Game Commission's office.

As far as kids go, I would be very surprised if children are implemented in a true-to-life way in this game (or the next, or the next); the ESRB gets very upset about politically-touchy issues (murdering children, wayward nipbles, etc.). Bethesda, as every other developer, is at their mercy. If children are included, I expect that they will be vastly under-represented as compared to true-life ratios and will play quite limited roles.

Personally, I think altering character models to show the signs of aging would create enough perceived age variation that fully-fledged children (10 years old or less) wouldn't need to be included, and the ESRB problems could be avoided.

You don't have to make them immortal/unkillable the way characters are in Oblivion (We think you got the memo on that one that it's really, really annoying). All you do is give them plenty of hit points, and whenever they get struck by a weapon or spell, they run in the opposite direction. And their speed is greater than any other character in the game, even with enchantments. Voila, death is avoided.

As I said, the ESRB would be all over that. They changed Oblivion's rating to M because someone found nipbles on models (that never actually showed in-game). Mods and console commands allow anyone to die, and the ESRB would take this into account.

I wouldn't mind them not being in the game, personally.


I agree here. Adding breadth while limiting time frame for development must also decrease depth; in other words, children are a potential aspect of the game that will come at the expense of another aspect. I'd rather see other things done.
User avatar
Cedric Pearson
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:39 pm

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 11:19 pm

Oh, no no no! You can't have invincible children! What with today's increasingly violent and impressionable youth who can't tell the difference between games and reality and whatnot, they'll start thinking all children are invincible, and then you'll be sorry!
User avatar
Emmi Coolahan
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:14 pm

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 10:54 pm

No kids, and usually these threads are promptly locked.
User avatar
Chenae Butler
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:54 pm

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 10:35 pm

Kids are annoying in real life, and they would be annoying in Skyrim. No thanks.
User avatar
Dalia
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:29 pm

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 8:15 am

I wouldnt prefer it either way.
User avatar
Bereket Fekadu
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:41 pm

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 8:09 pm

Kids? No thanks. They don't add anything to the game imo. In fact if anything I find they take away from the game, the kids in Fable 2 and 3 are annoying. I don't want anything that can't be killed, and I don't want to be able to kill kids. I am pretty sure Skyrim will be child-free
User avatar
Lynette Wilson
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:20 pm

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim