It all comes down to potential.

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:26 am

Yes, I have been hard on C2 and Crytek over this game. It's not that I don't like the game, it's that I see so much potential wasted. This could be a GREAT game. I have disposable income - otherwise I would not play video games so the money spent on it is another issue.

I have posted many negative comments, but it's really directed at the the shame of it. Many players have left already and how many are willing to come back if and when it's fixed? It's just sad really, nothing more. Why post this - partially because I truly like the game, partially because I think it's survival on console is in jeopardy. How do you think the game stands up to the current leaders in concept? Obviously it has problems in function and that's not in question.
User avatar
Michelle Smith
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:03 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:33 am

I agree, but it just needs simple patching. However, there are so many issues, and the last patch came out on March 31st, so a patch needs to be coming out soon.
User avatar
Sammykins
 
Posts: 3330
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:48 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:04 pm

I agree, the multiplayer would be amazing if there weren't so many glitches. I think the game shouldn't have been released with this many glitches. Crytek really should've spent more time making sure that the multiplayer was working right.
User avatar
Victor Oropeza
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 4:23 pm


Return to Crysis