» Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:16 pm
Another thing to consider is the "cause." Looking at history, the Romans generally had their honor and glory at stake, ensuring commanders fought for something other than just personal gain. It largely worked; the Roman Empire was one of the most expansive and quickly-moving empires in history. Here, I think, we can give a point to the Imperials and the Dunmer. Jump forward to the American Revolution and many will wonder how a rag-tag militia fought off the biggest superpower of the day. Generally speaking, it was a combination of guerrilla warfare and the "cause of liberty." Having that uniting factor really makes a difference. Here, the Dunmer, Argonians, and Khajiit get points.
I'd say, watching it play out, that the start of the war would be sheer chaos. By the end, it would come down to the Imperials and the Dunmer--both already worn and beaten by that point. In this regard, the Dunmer have an advantage, as they are intimately aware of setback and strife, but I'm not sure it would be enough to defeat the Imperial "machine."