Most? I've seen mostly 5-8% myself. The Pitt has like 7% or so if I remember correctly.
Unless I'm sorely mistaken. I don't think the military percentages have been out of whack.
Most? I've seen mostly 5-8% myself. The Pitt has like 7% or so if I remember correctly.
Unless I'm sorely mistaken. I don't think the military percentages have been out of whack.
I would actually like that, since I'm such a McNamara fan. I assume this would be up to however chose Vegas though. Unless everyone else thinks it's OK if they moved on of course
That's a good point, it would make sense for them to do that.
I suppose if Solus is chosen for the first Summit the reason would be the Chancellor grew curious about the state of the Brotherhood remnants, and, in an effort, or a perhaps merely a whim, he decided to invite everyone possible to the Summit.
He always was a whimsical sort of guy after all.
I'd rather go for the Pitt since it's closer but I'll go for Solace.
Nobody picked Vegas I think, else whoever has them will be extremely sore with the Legion. I say go for it, they have no player.
Good a reason as any. Hell Maxwell just wanted to meet everyone, your reason is a heck of a lot better than mine.
Yes Man reserved them. I don't think he's for sure if he's playing them though.
Otherwise facist might be interest.
I wonder if Fisheye will join as Mexico again.
A faction should also be in Minnesota and they can be like vikings.
Hmm... in that case, I'll go ahead and put that in there. If someone does pick Vegas and they want them back, their more than welcome to do so. Such is the magic of the edit button after all
Sounds like we've got ourselves a plot then! Well, is Solus what everyone's thinking then? I'll get a description up after my faction sheet if necessary, and double-time it on the faction sheet.
Hmm, I can't remember where he posted. Anyhow, no mater who plays them, Vegas and the Legion won't be friends at all this run.
An event me and Mouse worked out.
Contact of 2297
On November 19, 2297 the Northern American Navy sent out an expedition fleet containing 6 destroyers, 4 Frigates and 2 cruisers to North Asia to learn the state of the area. A Japanese patrol spotted a large fleet. When the patrol fleet saw this, they relayed news back to the Imperial Japanese Navy Headquarters of a large fleet. The North Asia expedition relayed news of Japan surviving and when the Commnader of the Patrol greeted the Americans on crude English, a Japanese-American replied Pisu for peace. Both nations have agreed to meet on the mark of 2398 due to holidays are coming up.
Edit: Made a typo.
Alright I'll change it.
I was exaggerating a little, but one person has I think 250,000 soldiers with a pop of 1,250,000. Cannot remember which faction.
Just a little.
Well if someone does we need to correct that unless they have a very good reason for it. That's way too high a military for what (I assume) is a Tier 2 faction.
Just real quick, what is the status on jets? Are we using old, Vietnam era stuff like last time, or are we cutting it out all together?
It sSummit style again. 1950s to early 70s era.
Yeah. That's what I was thinking for the Pitt's aircraft. Huey's for helicopters and the generic Lockheed jets from Fallout 3 and New Vegas.
Also, I sort of like the North American expedition to Japan, as it gives a reason for them to participate, but perhaps we could clarify why the NACA sent out the ships? Aside from just "to find out what was in Asia."
Isn't the naming of the NACA kind of off though? Their descriptive words will be North American. How will we distinguish NACA North American from normal North American?
Because they wanted to know the state of Japan and Korea after the Great War along with China. But mainly, pure knowledge.
Northern American Alliance. Demonym, Northernn America.
Isn't that odd though, to send that many ships just to poke around? Seems like resources could be better used.
That name is off, somehow. I mean, if it's an alliance, how is it a nation? Northern America infantry, that's a misleading description.
I have not posted my sheet...yet. All stuff shall be explained eventually.
Plus I find the term Northern American better than American-Canadian IMO.
Whatever you say, Bos.
Why not just rename it to something that isn't so confusing?
Why would it be American-Canadian?
It would just be Canadian.
Alaska is America so technically it's American Canadian. Despite how most the territory is on Canadian lands.
Not anymore.
Its long past the point of being under the United States. So is Canada for that matter. Not really Canada anymore.
But anyway, what you name your faction is your business. But I too think a name that rolls off the tongue better would be preferable.
No it is! Are you America nor not?!
By the way my MSG.