It is playable, I was playing it just now.

What GODLIKE ENTHUSIAM.

What energy! That was the fastest twenty minutes of purified adrenaline i have ever seen. Thank you AngryJoe for the rush :cake: :foodndrink: :cake:

believe me you will have, play 60 hour and get a 8 mb file , then cry like a baby

Looking at your forum nick, its obvious that you're just a bloody troll.
Stop polluting the forums and go play pokemon or something.

Already seen it , yeah funny revieuw gotta love the amount of effort and work he puts into his videos.

He's prob my fav reviewer, and he usually a good follower to see if you should get a game or not. I got hooked after seeing all good reviews Fable 3 got then, I saw his "32 Reasons Fable 3 svcks" I LOL'd so hard cause he was right. Then, I watch his other reviews. Been hooked to them since.

Agreed 9001% agreed.

Angry Joe is a damn moron. He mugs the camera and all the information he ever lays out is as in-depth as is the article of the game on wikipedia or the description on the back of the box. He is as easily impressed by simplicity and flashy crap on the screen as are most 14 year olds that this game targets.



A stopped clock is right twice a day.

Great reviewer, sometimes he complains about odd stuff, but he also often points out flaws in games that other reviewers completely ignore. And Skyrim definitely deserves great scores, even with the flaws it has.

Lol no you are a troll and a bad one at that, I have the PS3 version and I am 60 hours in with not ONE crash or glitch so it is either you or your PS3 that is unplayable, just because you have one opinion doesn't make it FACT infact, you are in the minority so you should have an icecream ! :icecream:

I do and have an 8 MB file, the trick is to 1. make lots of different saves and rotate them, and 2. quit back to the main menu BEFORE you press the PS button to exit, this releases the cache and stops with corruptions and lagging issues. LEARN before you make an outrageous claim like that, or you are the troll I picked from the start! I hate people who think just because they are having a problem it is FACT and everyone who plays it is! :sadvaultboy:

I enjoyed Fable 3 for what it was and Dragon Age 2 was ok, first was far superior.

Opinions are like....

Angry Joe doesn't seem very angry. He definately is entertaining and creative with his reviews. Whether I would trust his opinion is something else.

Angry Joe is one of the best reviewers out there. Pretty much all of his review scores spot on.

This is not remotely a 10/10 game.

This is some pretty art with fun crafting and an average story.

Actual gameplay is almost entirely missing.

I know AngryJoe usually does a good job but every reviewer from time to times gets a boner for something that they just can't control. I think a LOT less of anyone who scores this 10/10, to be honest.

Oh my! You seem to have such high standards regarding games.
Pray tell, which game would be a 10/10 in your opinion, oh wise one.

A lil explaination on the 10/10 score.
As explained in his Red Dead Redemption video review:

1) A 10/10 on Angryjoe doesn't mean perfect without any flaws whatsoever.

2) It means its so good that none of its drawbacks matter in the grand scheme of things.

3) It means it worth every penny of the money paid for the game.

4) It means its among the best in its genre, one that other similar games will be measured up to when they come along.

If you're looking for a game thats fun, addictive, worth every penny and DOESN'T
HAVE ANY FLAWS or manage to piss you off, you will NEVER EVER FIND that game.

Skyrim is a well deserved 10/10 IMO.

Hoo-ray!

yeah... skyrim shouldve a 9/10 just for bugs. maybe he didnt have many problems, but they can get really intrusive and annoying, certainly enough to impact the overall goodness and prevent a 10/10.

i harp on the game plenty, but i have to admit that relative to most of the trash being released, skyrim is definitely a 10/10. joe has always had a bit of an ironic namesake though... he is usually a very nice reviewer, not nearly as critical or meticulous as veteran players can be. im surprised he didnt make some complaint about no co-op/ multiplayer... his one flaw as a reviewer lol.

He clearly says: "they added significant improvements to what I already considered one of my favourite RPG franchises of all time".

How is he not a fan-boy? :confused:

He's not very "angry" either.

He reminds me of turtle from Entourage, which isn't a good thing.

Personally I don't like his reviews. Not because they're inaccurate... but because I find the guy extremely annoying. His sketches are stupid, not funny and I don't want to watch them in a review. 30 second ads in front of his reviews don't help either. Fair enough he wants to make some cash but they annoy me.

I prefer gamespot reviews.

Also, wtf is up with showing the dragon on the top of the mountain at the beginning? I haven't seen that in the main quest yet. Is that a frickin spoiler in the review?

Haha indeed . That's one thing I don't like in his reviews. But I do like how he can get really excited about games and drool over the awesome stuff and still remain objective enough to point out the bad things. And I also like how he often says that even though some games have flaws, it doesn't prevent him from enjoying them to the max. More reviewers should be like him.

Nice review. I wonder if anyone watches the "Zero Punctuation" reviews

Sykrim for sure does deserves a high rating due to its massive content, but considering the outdated Mechanics and pretty basic unresponsive Quests it shouldnt really get all those "perfect" scrores.

Like the other "angry" critics (AVGN, Nostalgia Critic) this guy is completely unfunny and is just obnoxious and annoying.


Well, this pretty much tells me to disregard his opinion on anything ever. RDR is mediocre at best, and mostly just plain terrible.