anyone wanted to find out what the UK/ Europe would be like

Post » Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:49 am

A fallout in europe would be cool, a long as it show that europe had been fighting a war for years before the great war, Rusted tanks in the streets, mangled anti air guns on rooftops, artillery emplacments, downed planes and helicopters, trenchlines and other fortifications.

But if your gonna do it in britian please dont set it in london, its been done to death, london is a very boring place, the game would just be a big city set it somewhere not done much. If im sticking with the resource wars theme set it up north, lots of coal up here very vital to defend. (and then you could have crazy steam punk tech)
User avatar
Facebook me
 
Posts: 3442
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:05 am

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:32 pm

London would not be boring and London has hardly been done to death. It's fairly common as a game location, but nowhere near as common as, say, NYC or other certain American cities and regions.
User avatar
Jack Bryan
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 2:31 am

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:40 pm

London would not be boring and London has hardly been done to death. It's fairly common as a game location, but nowhere near as common as, say, NYC or other certain American cities and regions.

I say set it in Berlin, that would have been the setting of many resource war battles as it is quite central in Europe and was probably an economic center.
User avatar
Sophh
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:58 pm

Post » Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:11 am

London would not be boring and London has hardly been done to death. It's fairly common as a game location, but nowhere near as common as, say, NYC or other certain American cities and regions.

Wrecked national Monuments.... Getting around by an old underground railroad.... Sound like any game you've played recently?
User avatar
Emerald Dreams
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:52 pm

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:45 pm

Well, most cities viable for a Fallout game would have wrecked monuments of some form, as well as an underground transit system of some form, and it will probably be in Fallout London. But, it does not need to have as big a role as the Metro.

I'm only defending London to the death because I'm working on a Fallout London idea. :P
User avatar
Laurenn Doylee
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:48 am

Post » Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:20 am

No, Fallout belongs ONLY in the U.S. That is what the game is about. Do not tear away the very foundation of the series' setting.
User avatar
Kat Stewart
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:30 am

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:55 pm

Why everything go to UK/Europe?

There are lots of other destinations around the world where we may Fallout. If it is really a Series I hope to hear new Locations soon.

Cheers...
User avatar
james tait
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:26 pm

Post » Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:29 am

Well, I didn't go through the whole discussion, but I read some parts of it. I think that the Fallout series should remain within the US. It would be cool to see what happened to China and many other places, but as pointed out already, the Enclave and BoS are solely American groups that would not belong in such places. The story would have to change so much that it wouldn't even be Fallout anymore. It'd be just another post-apocalyptic game, with the Fallout title attached to it for kicks. (And that's not what anybody wants.)

I also want to point out that Canada was annexed by the US. If the player were to visit Canada, they'd see a different enviroment and probably some different factions, but it's still America. It might be interesting if there were some struggle between (what used to be) Canada and the United States though. :coolvaultboy: Maybe the Canadians want to seperate and reclaim their independence? I'm not sure if such a storyline would belong in Fallout, but it'd be kinda cool to watch that unfold.
User avatar
Alkira rose Nankivell
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:56 pm

Post » Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:00 am

Yeah, but do the Enclave or BOS need to be in every game? I think not.
Do there need to be Vaults in every game, well yes and no. Yes because if you say fallout I think Vault (and vice versa) but if another setting (outside of USA for example) is worked out right, and still have influences such as nuka cola or robco or whatever, it could be a worthy (and fun to play) addition to the series.
User avatar
Tyrel
 
Posts: 3304
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:52 am

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:48 pm

Well, I didn't go through the whole discussion, but I read some parts of it. I think that the Fallout series should remain within the US. It would be cool to see what happened to China and many other places, but as pointed out already, the Enclave and BoS are solely American groups that would not belong in such places. The story would have to change so much that it wouldn't even be Fallout anymore. It'd be just another post-apocalyptic game, with the Fallout title attached to it for kicks. (And that's not what anybody wants.)

The Enclave and the BoS have nothing to do with the FO setting so that's kind of a moot point :whistle:

I also want to point out that Canada was annexed by the US. If the player were to visit Canada, they'd see a different enviroment and probably some different factions, but it's still America. It might be interesting if there were some struggle between (what used to be) Canada and the United States though. :coolvaultboy: Maybe the Canadians want to seperate and reclaim their independence?

You do know neither Canada nor the US existed anymore, right? There would actually be nothing to regain independence from anything.
User avatar
Jessie
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:54 am

Post » Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:49 am

The Enclave and the BoS have nothing to do with the FO setting so that's kind of a moot point :whistle:

Really? I wonder why everybody claims this when both have been present in all 3 games (minus Enclave in the original Fallout, and not even going to bring up Fallout Tactics cause I haven't played it). The Enclave were a pretty big presence in 2 and 3. I understand if people don't wanna see them return, but why say they have nothing to do with the Fallout setting? They seem pretty significant to me.

You do know neither Canada nor the US existed anymore, right? There would actually be nothing to regain independence from anything.


I brought up the independence thing only as an 'idea' for a story. Maybe it's not a good one, but I'm sure you've had your fair share of slip-ups as well. I wrote the message at 4 in the morning. How alert am I going to be? Excuse me for thinking aloud.
User avatar
Nice one
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:30 am

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:26 pm

I brought up the independence thing only as an 'idea' for a story. Maybe it's not a good one, but I'm sure you've had your fair share of slip-ups as well. I wrote the message at 4 in the morning. How alert am I going to be? Excuse me for thinking aloud.

No need to explain yourself to me. You made a suggestion and I commented on it. That's what's forums are about, you know. Sigh, what's up with people here lately that they're so sensitive? :shrug:

EDIT: Oh, I noticed you said something else inside my quote there. I'll answer it here:

Really? I wonder why everybody claims this when both have been present in all 3 games (minus Enclave in the original Fallout, and not even going to bring up Fallout Tactics cause I haven't played it). The Enclave were a pretty big presence in 2 and 3. I understand if people don't wanna see them return, but why say they have nothing to do with the Fallout setting? They seem pretty significant to me.

The BoS was already dwindling in F2, and by VB it was supposed to be on the brink of losing the war with the NCR. As for the Enclave, it was completely destroyed as a cohesive faction, with only small bands of survivors scattered about and fending off for themselves. Tactics is semi-canon at bset and FOBOS not even that. In F2, there was mere passing mentions of the Master's Army, and cameo appearances at best of previous factions (including the BoS), which shows FO was never really meant to be a franchise of recurring players.
User avatar
Da Missz
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:42 pm

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:14 pm

No need to explain yourself to me. You made a suggestion and I commented on it. That's what's forums are about, you know. Sigh, what's up with people here lately that they're so sensitive? :shrug:


If you look back at your response, maybe you could see that it appeared to be very cynical. I don't know if that was your intent, but as I interpreted it, you were talking down to me as if I'm oh-so-stupid. Need I point out that we're on the internet? Some things are hard to interpret through words. Sarcasm can be mistaken for insults, and so on.

With a remark such as:
You do know neither Canada nor the US existed anymore, right? (implying ignorance on my part)


I don't know how you expect me to react? Perhaps my reaction was sensitive, but I think you also need to step back and examine what you said too. The fault doesn't lie completely with me. Anyway, no hard feelings. I'm just tired of having to defend myself all the time.
User avatar
Alexander Horton
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:19 pm

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 11:14 pm

But what kind of creatures would there be? Evil mutant badgers and evil mutant hedgehogs?
User avatar
Cash n Class
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:01 am

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:44 pm

Well, Radscorpions would return, being from pet shops. Other pets include dogs, cats (big cats prowling the streets of suburban London?), snakes, hamsters and such. Bears are sometimes found in zoos, but I'd imagine them to be rare. Creatures like Mirelurks, Radroaches, Bloatflies, Ghouls, Geckos and such could plausibly return.

I think the best area for Fallout would be southeast Britain, focused around the remains of London.
User avatar
Sarah Unwin
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:31 pm

Post » Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:02 am

Seeing as the U.S. disbanded the U.N. and China most likely inhaled Russia during the Resource Wars, I'm thinking Europe got less of a nuclear spanking than the U.S. and mainland China. How else would Alistair Tenpenny find a good enough ship to get from the U.K. to the D.C. tidal basin?
User avatar
Cagla Cali
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:36 am

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:08 pm

Seeing as the U.S. disbanded the U.N. and China most likely inhaled Russia during the Resource Wars, I'm thinking Europe got less of a nuclear spanking than the U.S. and mainland China. How else would Alistair Tenpenny find a good enough ship to get from the U.K. to the D.C. tidal basin?


Ah, aside from the debatable geopolitical points, you brought up Tenpenny. He came to USA to make his fortune. It was explicitly stated by Fallout 3 designers that this shows the UK is buggered.
User avatar
Kelly Upshall
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:26 pm

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:00 pm

Ah, aside from the debatable geopolitical points, you brought up Tenpenny. He came to USA to make his fortune. It was explicitly stated by Fallout 3 designers that this shows the UK is buggered.

Doesnt actually prove it though.... I'm originaly from Australia, living in the UK, and Australia is isnt quite buggered
User avatar
Roy Harris
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:58 pm

Post » Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:59 am

Australia would be screwed; the fallout would kick up into the atmosphere and, carried by the jet streams, land in Australia and its waters.
User avatar
Laura-Jayne Lee
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:35 pm

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:19 pm

Doesnt actually prove it though.... I'm originaly from Australia, living in the UK, and Australia is isnt quite buggered


It was stated specifically by designers. I think we can safely assume the UK was hit. And what did my statement have to do with Australia?
User avatar
Adriana Lenzo
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 1:32 am

Post » Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:43 pm

Ah, aside from the debatable geopolitical points, you brought up Tenpenny. He came to USA to make his fortune. It was explicitly stated by Fallout 3 designers that this shows the UK is buggered.



It does not show that the UK is worse than the US, aside from there being no (or little) communication between the countries, people go to aftermaths of war zones to seek fortunes all the time, iv got a family member who does it with a reconstruction company, he travel from the UK to Iraq that dosn't prove that the UK is in a worse state than iraq.
User avatar
XPidgex Jefferson
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 4:39 pm

Post » Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:48 am

It was stated specifically by designers. I think we can safely assume the UK was hit. And what did my statement have to do with Australia?

Absolutely nothing .... But, as you would have realised if you read my post correctly, just because one person moves from one part of the world to the other (such as myself) doesnt mean one place is particularly bad.

Dev comments are fine, but until they're in the game they don't count 100% - What is said in Future games trumps what devs say today. The act of one person moving from one part of the other without stating his reasons in game doesnt "lock in" those dev comments.
User avatar
Marine Arrègle
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:19 am

Post » Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:11 am

Well, if America was hit and the Brits weren't, the Brits would probably know before too long. Thus, noone would go their to make a fortune. Evl mnkey, your relative going to Iraq is different. Iraq still has a government, still has proper civilisation and even if Iraq does descend into a wasteland with no chance of proper reconstruction, he can come back. That would not be easy for Tenpenny (and Moriarty, and possibly Dukov.) It would pretty much be a one way ticket, returning would take years to prepare and then longer to get back. The Brits must have been in bad shape, and unaware of what happened to America, to attempt to return.
User avatar
Maddy Paul
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:35 am

The Brits must have been in bad shape, and unaware of what happened to America, to attempt to return.

Again.... no. Certain Continents were "civilised" by folks with a one-way ticket, and the places they came from werent hell-on-earth.
User avatar
Ella Loapaga
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:45 pm

Post » Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:55 am

FallOut Sweden: Mutant Polarbears, IKEA-made shelters, all humans have commited suicide BEFORE the Great War.
Except for the ABBA-cultists :intergalactic:
Nah I prefer FallOut as is.
User avatar
Chris Guerin
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 2:44 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout Series Discussion

cron