I was thinking about making one but I've heard a lot of people talking about how horrible the destruction tree is due to the skill not scaling it's damage like melee. Is it really that bad? Is conjuration good at a higher level? Overall would this type of character be useless? I'm getting a little tired of the 2-H nord and for some reason I think the arrows in the game sometimes go through other characters.
Apparently you can't rely on or might not be satisfied with destruction ONLY at high levels past 40 and playing on harder levels, it might be OK if playing on adept or lower.
Don't listen to people that say "don't use destruction" , they are overreacting, sure it's weaker at higher levels but not useless as long as you augment it with conjuration or other schools of magic.
On higher levels it's all about strategy and complementing all magic with each other, not relying on only one thing. But to say destruction is to be avoided is just plain dumb.
It is still fun, in that you can conjure some creatures to fight for you and you stand back and blast enemies with destruction, it will still harm them and the damage combo of what the summons do in damage along with your own destruction makes up for it and it's potent.
All alone destruction might not be enough, BUT on low levels of difficulty it MIGHT be OK all by itself.
Otherwise playing a pure mage that also dabble in conjuration and use enchantments to help out with magicka cost reduction and it should be fine.
Also if it is ever too hard or you feel not enough damage, just lower the difficulty settings,
Most of the complainers about magic, play on the hardest setting, they seem not to use their head and lower the settings to compensate for destruction not scaling well.
Also if you play on PC you can always mod the magic to make it more powerful, even though the mod-kit isn't out yet there are already at least two mods that make magic much more powerful.
Also you can play with heavy armor to have more survivability to become some kind of caster-battlemage.