» Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:37 pm
This is a... Difficult question to answer to say the least. I have read over the entire article and everybody's posts in response and I will have to say, a lot of people have their heads in the right place. I think it all comes down to the intention and what is at heart to determine the morality.
If we look to Isran, his methods are crude, he might be a little fanatical, but what is at his heart is the protection of living beings from what he sees as a grave threat. His heart is in the right place in that regard, but he also fails to note that Vampires are sentient beings that are capable of reason and logic. Not all vampires should just be hated or killed, but those who are a threat it is only natural to want to eliminate.
Lord Harkon does what he thinks will deliver Vampires into their "rightful place" as great lords over the mortal races. His thoughts are of his own people but not for preservation. He seeks dominance, as a true follower of Molag Bal would seek. I see this as a bit of an evil act... To offer clarity, I will refer to a story I have in a DnD campaign as to how an act of dominance can be a good act or (as in Lord Harkon's place) an evil act.
I made a DnD setting where there was a nation ruled by a powerful and ancient vampire named Umbra Nemuritor. When he received the gift, he used it to conquer the island nation and establish vampires as the ruling class and mortals as slaves beneath them. Now then, that sounds evil, does it not? The conquering of an entire nation, the enslaving of an entire race, and the establishment of himself as the God-King of the nation. However, if you look inside his heart and mind and see why he did it, the issue becomes a little less black and white. He knew that for so long as Vampires existed, they would be hunted for what they are. He did not want to see his fellows killed simply for existing as what they were, and he had tried negotiations. These negotiations fell through when an attempt on his life was made. He realized the only way for Vampires to live free of fear was for them to become the rulers. Since he knew mortals would not trust him and his kind, he did not trust the mortals with any power. Once Vampires reached a place of dominance in having their own powerful nation, he stopped his conquests and allowed negotiations to begin with the neighboring nations (governed by living beings). Because his kind was in a place of power, the other nations were forced to accept their existence and not hunt them. Lord Nemuritor committed evil for the sake of what was, from the point of view of the vampires, the greater good.
Just my thoughts, sorry for using a non TES source to debate here.