Are you obsessed?

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 5:16 am

Here is what i have gathered from this thread.

Hiroshima = Art
User avatar
Marina Leigh
 
Posts: 3339
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:59 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:40 pm

Here is what i have gathered from this thread.

Hiroshima = Art

That's a shame.
User avatar
Jonny
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:04 am

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:00 am

Here is what i have gathered from this thread.

Hiroshima = Art

I must say, the visual power of a nuclear bomb exploding is quite impressive (the force-power as well, obviously).

But I even though Dr. Strangelove ends with a mash-up of different nuke-mushrooms, it's not art to me.
User avatar
LuCY sCoTT
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:29 am

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 5:01 am

Last night I had a dream that I was reading forums and there was an interview, i scrolled down and question was 'What is the official release date?' and reply started off as 'We finally have a release date, it is' then my alarm clock woke me up. I'm sorry I failed you all, the FPS God gave me a chance at the release date, and my alarm clock owned me, I am disgrace.
User avatar
Siobhan Thompson
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 10:40 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:45 pm

Here is what i have gathered from this thread.

Hiroshima = Art


A lot can be taken in from that statement.
Big boom, pretty.


But seriously, Hiroshima = inspiration, to me at least.
Thus "Art" is subjective:

Art
–noun
1. the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.
2. the class of objects subject to aesthetic criteria; works of art collectively, as paintings, sculptures, or drawings: a museum of art; an art collection.
3. a field, genre, or category of art: Dance is an art.
4. the fine arts collectively, often excluding architecture: art and architecture.
5. any field using the skills or techniques of art: advertising art; industrial art.
6. (in printed matter) illustrative or decorative material: Is there any art with the copy for this story?
7. the principles or methods governing any craft or branch of learning: the art of baking; the art of selling.
8. the craft or trade using these principles or methods.
9. skill in conducting any human activity: a master at the art of conversation.
10. a branch of learning or university study, esp. one of the fine arts or the humanities, as music, philosophy, or literature.

11. arts,
--a. ( used with a singular verb ) the humanities: a college of arts and sciences.
--b. ( used with a plural verb ) liberal arts.

12. skilled workmanship, execution, or agency, as distinguished from nature.
13. trickery; cunning: glib and devious art.
14. studied action; artificiality in behavior.
15. an artifice or artful device: the innumerable arts and wiles of politics.
16. Archaic . science, learning, or scholarship.

User avatar
R.I.P
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 8:11 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:58 pm

"Once when asked what Trans-Siberian Orchestra was about, Paul O'Neill
replied, "It's about creating great art. When asked to define what great art
was, Paul said, "The purpose of art is to create an emotional response in the
person that is exposed to that art. And there are three categories of art;
bad art, good art and great art. Bad art will elicit no emotional response in
the person that is exposed to it, i.e.; a song you hear in an elevator and it
does nothing to you, a picture on a wall that gives you the same emotional
response as if the wall had been blank, a movie that chews up time. Good
art will make you feel an emotion that you have felt before; you see a
picture of a forest and you remember the last time you went fishing with
your dad, you hear a song about love and you remember the last time you
were in love. Great art will make you feel an emotion you have never felt
before; seeing the pieta, the world famous sculpture by Michelangelo, can
cause someone to feel the pain of losing a child even if they've never had
one. And when you're trying for these emotions the easiest one to trigger is
anger. Anyone can do it. Go into the street, throw a rock at someone, you
will make them angry. The emotions of love, empathy and laughter are
much harder to trigger, but since they operate on a deeper level, they bring
a much greater reward."

- from the http://www.urbandictionary.com/

I think this is a much better description. Even though it totally defeats my earlier arguments.
User avatar
Ladymorphine
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 2:22 pm

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:41 am

This brings up a popular modern philosophical question. Are video games art? Would you question someone who was going through the sketches or interviews of a famous artist months before he unveils his next masterpiece? Does comparing an interactive media to a static creation even make sense? These are questions people at the top of their fields could argue for days and never come to any agreements on. But in general, I disagree with belittling what others find fascinating.


My take on the whole argument is that as a whole, a video game is not a piece of art anymore then saying a game of football is art (not an art, but art, two different things). But with video games, everything visual in game is art. The models, the textures, the way the placement/use of shaders, lighting, it's all art. To call it anything else is to completely misunderstand the absolute most basic concept of what art is. Something uniquely created to be visually interpreted by someone else. In what regard? That doesn't matter. It's art. But again, looking at a video game as a whole, it is not art (Art is not interactive, it is presented in a static state, or states.). IMO
User avatar
Alexandra Ryan
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:01 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:40 pm

My take on the whole argument is that as a whole, a video game is not a piece of art anymore then saying a game of football is art (not an art, but art, two different things). But with video games, everything visual in game is art. The models, the textures, the way the placement/use of shaders, lighting, it's all art. To call it anything else is to completely misunderstand the absolute most basic concept of what art is. Something uniquely created to be visually interpreted by someone else. In what regard? That doesn't matter. It's art. But again, looking at a video game as a whole, it is not art (Art is not interactive, it is presented in a static state, or states.). IMO

If you follow the "definition" of modern art, then videogames belong in the louvre. They try to play on people's emotions, they try to pull people into a story, isn't that exactly the same as paintings, sculptures and pictures?
(I rather have games that paintings though xD)
Not to mention the fact that games take way more time and "craftsmanship" to develop than the average modern painting.
User avatar
naome duncan
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:18 pm

If you follow the "definition" of modern art, then videogames belong in the louvre. They try to play on people's emotions, they try to pull people into a story, isn't that exactly the same as paintings, sculptures and pictures?
(I rather have games that paintings though xD)
Not to mention the fact that games take way more time and "craftsmanship" to develop than the average modern painting.


If we're going on that logic, then shooting a child in the head is an artistic masterpiece to dwarf the Mona Lisa!

Video games do not belong in the Louvre, just like how books do not belong in the Louvre, they are completely different things from what art is.
User avatar
Charles Mckinna
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:51 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:59 pm

If we're going on that logic, then shooting a child in the head is an artistic masterpiece to dwarf the Mona Lisa!

Video games do not belong in the Louvre, just like how books do not belong in the Louvre, they are completely different things from what art is.

The first sentence was obviously exagerated. Ofcourse they don't belong there. I'm just saying that if you strictly follow the definition, then you should consider videogames art. I would like to see what people say about this subject within 40 years.
User avatar
joannARRGH
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:09 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:46 pm

If we're going on that logic, then shooting a child in the head is an artistic masterpiece to dwarf the Mona Lisa!

Video games do not belong in the Louvre, just like how books do not belong in the Louvre, they are completely different things from what art is.


On the note of shooting kids anyone else annoyed that you can't do it in Fable?

This has gotten a tad off topic btw.
User avatar
Bird
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:45 am

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:43 am

The first sentence was obviously exagerated. Ofcourse they don't belong there. I'm just saying that if you strictly follow the definition, then you should consider videogames art. I would like to see what people say about this subject within 40 years.


Yeah, I wasn't directly addressing you, just the idea of what you had said. By no means do I consider books, video games, etc, any less in some tangible way to art, I just believe they are in completely different categories. For example, Calculus is not art, yet it is absolutely amazing. I would take calculus over any piece of art ever created-
User avatar
MISS KEEP UR
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:26 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:15 pm

They try to play on people's emotions, they try to pull people into a story, isn't that exactly the same as paintings, sculptures and pictures?

Well, some of them actually try. Most really don't, though.
User avatar
Racheal Robertson
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:03 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:04 pm

Well, some of them actually try. Most really don't, though.

You're right, but do you feel any emotion by looking at a random piece of modern art?

I'm not defending videogames as art, just keeping the discussion alive :P
User avatar
Soku Nyorah
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:54 am

Of course I don't. Looking at Māori-Art for example usually just confuses me, because their way of portraying stuff is very different to ours (in a way like Japan-o games are very different from "western" games).
But they always have a very certain intention when doing that. Telling an important story of their kinsmen, most often.

It's not like when the next Call of Duty releases in November, it happens because it's one year after the previous Call of Duty.
User avatar
Victor Oropeza
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 4:23 pm

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:50 am

Once again, the obsession continues.

My desktop background is Brink, my computer's name is Brink, I'm playing Black Ops to get ready for it, my mother knows everything about it, and so do my step-brothers.

Every time I watch an action movie, I think about how my Heavy won't be able to climb this, or that.
Every time I watch an action movie, I think about how I can hurl myself over that obstacle with the SMART system on my Medium just so that throw of the molly looks extra sweet.

Everyone I know personally online asks me for info on Brink, and I just direct them to the mighty H0RSE's work of art. And I find it funny because I tell them every time I don't know everything.


Shiva, Hot Pockets, Doritos, an ash tray large enough to hold 6 packs worth of cigarette butts, and a tall glass of pure H20 until Brink comes out....

Not like much of that will change after release


:mohawk:
User avatar
Fiori Pra
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:30 pm

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:15 am

Once again, the obsession continues.

My desktop background is Brink, my computer's name is Brink, I'm playing Black Ops to get ready for it, my mother knows everything about it, and so do my step-brothers.

Every time I watch an action movie, I think about how my Heavy won't be able to climb this, or that.
Every time I watch an action movie, I think about how I can hurl myself over that obstacle with the SMART system on my Medium just so that throw of the molly looks extra sweet.

Everyone I know personally online asks me for info on Brink, and I just direct them to the mighty H0RSE's work of art. And I find it funny because I tell them every time I don't know everything.


Shiva, Hot Pockets, Doritos, an ash tray large enough to hold 6 packs worth of cigarette butts, and a tall glass of pure H20 until Brink comes out....

Not like much of that will change after release


:mohawk:

What's "Shiva"?
User avatar
Jessica Thomson
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:10 am

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:32 am

Dang, double post.
User avatar
kevin ball
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:02 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:46 pm

Shiva is the/one of the most important Hindu-Gods.
User avatar
Ross Thomas
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:06 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:01 pm

Shiva is a Hindu-Goddess.

Or an eidolon from the FF games =D
User avatar
Jah Allen
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:09 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:59 pm

Shiva is the/one of the most important Hindu-Gods.


That and its another fun name for Ganja.
Glad you caught that though.
User avatar
SamanthaLove
 
Posts: 3565
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:54 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:25 pm

I was asking as he referenced Shiva with his food products.

For example if I said "Wow, that was some delicious potatoes, titan, and steak you made.", would you think titan might be some type of food?
User avatar
Guy Pearce
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 3:08 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:42 pm

I was asking as he referenced Shiva with his food products.

For example if I said "Wow, that was some delicious potatoes, titan, and steak you made.", would you think titan might be some type of food?


Yeah, the sentence wasn't constructed correctly.


I just edited it and put that in front of it.
User avatar
i grind hard
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:58 am

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:35 am

How many people here plan on playing it competitively?
User avatar
Melly Angelic
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:47 am

How many people here plan on playing it competitively?

ish. I plan on playing a lot with my friends who are a lot better than pub players, and I may join a competitive clan, but just playing hardcoe games gets boring to me.
User avatar
DeeD
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:50 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games