Are you Pro/Anti Empire?

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:38 pm

Last time I check the only game that did not glorify the empire was redguard. hopefully with Skyrim taking place after the empire's fall we will find more reason to despise the empire.
User avatar
renee Duhamel
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:12 am

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:41 pm

Maybe there was in the past, but I still dont think there should be one homogeneous rule. The provinces dont have to be at war with each other, and its not much different than the possibility of war from just one big faction trying to push its way into everyone else for the sake of stopping war.

A war to end wars does not make sense to me.

I do think that its good that they dont burn down temples and do book burnings and stuff. But say they do take over, just having Imperials as the rulers would effect the culture and traditions over the years of any province with out them even intending to do so. The residences would slowly adapt the ways of the people in charge and start to lose their own lifestyles, rather than the province developing on its own according to the natives.

Also, every province has its share of problems, and this does not exclude the Empire, so why do they think they should be the ones to have rule?


You make for a great debater! I'm enjoying the good arguments here.

Conquest isn't always achieved in war. It certainly is the most common, but sometimes deals can be made. Morrowind and Hammerfell both negotiated rights for their countries in diplomacy, although it was after battle.

Imperial presence does have an effect, but not always. The presence in Vvardenfell was only pronounced in certain towns. Other cities seem relatively unaffected. And even considering the other cities, the blending of cultures is not bad. That is what cosmopolitanism is! It helps to share ideas and inventions, and in the end both sides come out stronger!

Finally, the right of rule for Tamriel can be best argued in the Emperor. Uriel Septim VII had the vision of the dragon born, which allowed him to see beyond others, and he could comprehend and judge better than others. It was he who sent the Imperial Agent to Vvardenfell to save Morrowind from Dagoth Ur, and it was he whom sent the Prisoner with the Amulet of Kings to the Blades to save Tamriel.
User avatar
Jeffrey Lawson
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:36 pm

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:11 pm

That's a fair argument. But the Empire really doesn't intend to destroy culture. Diversity IS important. Sure, missionaries go to the Ashlands and spread the word, but they aren't burning down the Tribunal Temples or anything like that.


The Ashlanders know pretty well how to mind their own business without anyone lecturing them so the imperial(ist)s should keep to their own too. I don't see why they have any business there if it's just for some jabbering they could live without.

Oh did I already tell: vividly anti. xD
User avatar
Floor Punch
 
Posts: 3568
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:18 am

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 5:42 pm

The affair isn't what bothered me, it was the manner in which he handled the aftermath. Cruel to the point of reprehensibility. There were other measures he could have taken that did not involve a forced aborting.



Perhaps. Yes, I'll have to concede to that. Tiber Septim certainly was a mixed bag, with his misuse of the Numidium.

Still, Tamriel was made better because of his rule. I'll leave his other various actions for wiser men to judge

The Ashlanders know pretty well how to mind their own business without anyone lecturing them so the imperial(ist)s should keep to their own too. I don't see why they have any business there if it's just for some jabbering they could live without.

Oh did I already tell: vividly anti. xD


People do change their minds though. Read the Invocation of Azura for an example. A dark elf priestess changed her allegiance to Daedric Princes no less than 3 times
User avatar
Phoenix Draven
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:50 am

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:08 pm

Morrowind... Empire tried to take over and pretty much take out the "old religions" and what not evil things you can do when you try to take over a land.


Im for and against the empire. Im against the empire because they tend to get power hungry. For because everybody is pretty much equal.
User avatar
Scotties Hottie
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:40 am

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 7:21 pm

fn double post.
User avatar
Kieren Thomson
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:28 am

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 7:18 pm

No empire...

FREEEEEEEEDOMMMM!!!
User avatar
~Amy~
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:38 am

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:29 pm

We would vote Neutral, but there is no option to do so.

Our avatars typically either live outside the law (thieves/wilderness-types), live outside the realm for various reasons (the physics experiment gone wrong/planar banishment), or live outside their right minds. Or any combination thereof.

We could not care less should the Empire rise or fall. Either way, there will be conflict, and it will entertain us... for a time.
User avatar
Blaine
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 4:24 pm

Post » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:11 am

Morrowind... Empire tried to take over and pretty much take out the "old religions" and what not evil things you can do when you try to take over a land.


Im for and against the empire. Im against the empire because they tend to get power hungry. For because everybody is pretty much equal.


The Empire recognized the divinity of the Tribunal though. As I've said, the Empire hasn't decided to burn down temples, nor should it

As for power, Uriel Septim VII gave me the impression of a rather humble man. There was no reason to feign that humility, not to an unknown prisoner.
User avatar
JLG
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:42 pm

Post » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:55 am

Remember that barging in and enforcing laws is pretty much what every country in the real world has done. England, France, Denmark, Spain to name a few.

Anyhail, I guess I am pro-Empire. Why? Because I'm nostalgia, I'll always think fondly of the four games where you worked in the Empire, not outside it.

But, it all depends on Titus Mede and Co. etc. If his line (another line?) managed to screw it all up.
User avatar
Kortknee Bell
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:05 pm

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:58 pm

You make for a great debater! I'm enjoying the good arguments here.

Conquest isn't always achieved in war. It certainly is the most common, but sometimes deals can be made. Morrowind and Hammerfell both negotiated rights for their countries in diplomacy, although it was after battle.

Imperial presence does have an effect, but not always. The presence in Vvardenfell was only pronounced in certain towns. Other cities seem relatively unaffected. And even considering the other cities, the blending of cultures is not bad. That is what cosmopolitanism is! It helps to share ideas and inventions, and in the end both sides come out stronger!

Finally, the right of rule for Tamriel can be best argued in the Emperor. Uriel Septim VII had the vision of the dragon born, which allowed him to see beyond others, and he could comprehend and judge better than others. It was he who sent the Imperial Agent to Vvardenfell to save Morrowind from Dagoth Ur, and it was he whom sent the Prisoner with the Amulet of Kings to the Blades to save Tamriel.

Haha, likewise, you're making me torn between the two now.

The idea of cosmopolitanism is good, but that can happen without one party taking over another all together. Trading, traveling, open borders will all contribute to this.

As for Imperial presence, it was mild which is good, but hadnt they just arrived in Morrowind when we played the game? Their influence would likely spread exponentially as time went on I would think.

On one hand I like the separation of provinces and independent rule.
But on the other, if not the Empire, another party would want to achieve what they are aiming for, and they would probably not have the same sense of law, order and good intention that the Empire has.
Hm, though just because things could be worse and some party with less good intentions (than the Empire) were to aim for rule, doesnt mean that it would happen, or that the provinces couldnt make alliances to subdue said party.

So while I did question, why the Empire, if I were to pick who were to rule, it would be them for their good intentions and no so forceful presence. This is a crazy topic lol.
User avatar
Samantha hulme
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:22 pm

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:30 pm

Haha, likewise, you're making me torn between the two now.

The idea of cosmopolitanism is good, but that can happen without one party taking over another all together. Trading, traveling, open borders will all contribute to this.

As for Imperial presence, it was mild which is good, but hadnt they just arrived in Morrowind when we played the game? Their influence would likely spread exponentially as time went on I would think.

On one hand I like the separation of provinces and independent rule.
But on the other, if not the Empire, another party would want to achieve what they are aiming for, and they would probably not have the same sense of law, order and good intention that the Empire has.
Hm, though just because things could be worse and some party with less good intentions (than the Empire) were to aim for rule, doesnt mean that it would happen, or that the provinces couldnt make alliances to subdue said party.

So while I did question, why the Empire, if I were to pick who were to rule, it would be them for their good intentions and no so forceful presence. This is a crazy topic lol.


The reason why it feels crazy is because it's largely political. It's forcing you to make moral and ethical decisions on a macro level. That is what a just leader does.

And you're right, other powers have already claimed Valenwood, Summerset, Morrowind, and others. A large majority of Hist affected Argonians devastated Morrowind. Vvardenfell is now a wasteland, certainly not the intention of the Empire

Valenwood and Summerset were conquered by the revival of the Thalmor. Nothing is known yet of this political organization
User avatar
Agnieszka Bak
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Mon Nov 08, 2010 5:48 am

I'll wait until I see what the pro-Imperial and anti-Imperial factions in Skyrim are like before I decide which I side with.
User avatar
Tiffany Holmes
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:28 am

Post » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:44 am

Uriel Septim VII had a history of just rule...

Bull.
User avatar
Barbequtie
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:34 pm

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:12 pm

Bull.

Care to elaborate? I;d like to know what happened :)
The reason why it feels crazy is because it's largely political. It's forcing you to make moral and ethical decisions on a macro level. That is what a just leader does.

And you're right, other powers have already claimed Valenwood, Summerset, Morrowind, and others. A large majority of Hist affected Argonians devastated Morrowind. Vvardenfell is now a wasteland, certainly not the intention of the Empire

Valenwood and Summerset were conquered by the revival of the Thalmor. Nothing is known yet of this political organization

I completely forgot about what happened to Vvardenfell (never read the book), perfect example of another party taking over. I'd take the Empire over Hist crazy Argonians any day.
User avatar
Laura Cartwright
 
Posts: 3483
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:12 pm

Post » Mon Nov 08, 2010 7:26 am

Anti.

I don't like the negative connotations associated with "Empire".

From what I understand, the empire is in decline. Perhaps it would be best for SR to forge out on it's own?

Rebellion sounds very cool, exciting and romantic.
User avatar
Naomi Lastname
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:21 am

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 7:19 pm

Bull.


Taken from UESP

Uriel Septim VII 3E 346-433

When Pelagius IV died in 3E 368, after an astonishing twenty-nine year reign, Tamriel was closer to unity than it had been since the days of Uriel I. Uriel Septim VII, son of Pelagius IV, has the diligence of his great-aunt Morihatha, the political skill of his great-uncle Uriel VI, and the military prowess of his great-grand-uncle Uriel V. For twenty-one years he reigned and brought justice and order to Tamriel.

User avatar
Jimmie Allen
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:39 am

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:46 pm

one power invading and forcing everyone else to live by their standards? no thank
User avatar
Breautiful
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:51 am

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:00 pm

People do change their minds though. Read the Invocation of Azura for an example. A dark elf priestess changed her allegiance to Daedric Princes no less than 3 times

Yet I don't see why this would allow imperialists to spread their influence and own culture in the Ashlands. The example you're giving still fits perfectly within the culture as far as I know.
User avatar
Dewayne Quattlebaum
 
Posts: 3529
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:29 pm

Post » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:42 am

I'm pro-whoever-pays-more.
User avatar
Baby K(:
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:07 pm

Post » Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:20 am

Yet I don't see why this would allow imperialists to spread their influence and own culture in the Ashlands. The example you're giving still fits perfectly within the culture as far as I know.


Changing loyalty to gods isn't a universal phenomenon? All the missionaries did was going to these places with books and kind words, not swords and torches. The reaction from the Ashlanders by contrast wasn't called for
User avatar
Lance Vannortwick
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:30 pm

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:07 pm

Anti because rebellion always makes more interesting plots.
User avatar
Connor Wing
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:22 am

Post » Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:56 am

i'm not Joining The Empire they got too much power and i don't want them to be the boss
so i join The Rebels
User avatar
celebrity
 
Posts: 3522
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:53 pm

Post » Mon Nov 08, 2010 5:40 am

Changing loyalty to gods isn't a universal phenomenon? All the missionaries did was going to these places with books and kind words, not swords and torches. The reaction from the Ashlanders by contrast wasn't called for

I wouldn't agree that converting to imperialist faith is the same as changing favour between gods in another polytheist system as is that on Vvardenfell with the daedric gods.
For the reaction, that's just one of the things you deserve to get when you trifle with Ashlanders and tell them their own beliefs are bull and something from down South will bring truth.
User avatar
Laura Cartwright
 
Posts: 3483
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:12 pm

Post » Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:34 pm

Pro-Empire.

Keep those slaving Dunmer in line.
User avatar
Alexandra Louise Taylor
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:48 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim