SO are you still buying Skyrim?

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:35 pm

Gamers can be such children. Just take their big yellow dump truck and go home if everything isn't to their liking. Give me a break. I couldn't care less about fewer armor choices. The game is what's important.

P.S.: Don't call this a comeback. I have an actual life. Keep up the outstanding work, Bethesda.
User avatar
Hazel Sian ogden
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:10 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:10 pm

To be honest, I like that they reduced the armor.

I think for one there will be more individual sets of armor than in either Morrowind or Oblivion in Skyrim. So, not being able to cobble together a set from various sources won't be as big a deal. Also doing the armor sets as one solid piece allows for them to be optimized much more in terms of polycount and animation, which in turn imroves how the game runs.

The only thing I don't like about reducing the ammount of pieces is that it turns into a sort of "all or nothing" situation with the super rare armor sets. I love how Deadric armor was handled in Morrowind, where it was incredibly rare and very difficult to get a full set for your character. You had to really explore every last nook of the game to find the whole set. In Oblivion on the other hand Daedric armor dropped like candy all around the world when you got to level 30ish, so it lost all its meaning. I don't know how they will handle rare sets of armor in Skyrim, but I hope its not going to be you stumbling across a deadric armor one day and then that's just it, you found the best set, all other armor is now uninteresting.
User avatar
Joanne Crump
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:44 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:35 am

I came on these forums to learn a little bit more on what looks to be a really good game.

The problem is I have to sift through endless posts of people crying and whining about a game that will probably end up being the best of the year. Stop crying! There is no such thing as a perfect game because everyone has different tastes. Deal with it you brats! If you don't like it use your imagination and roleplay the old fashioned way with dice, paper and your brain!
User avatar
Eilidh Brian
 
Posts: 3504
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:45 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:45 pm

Meanwhile one out of eight voters on this thread so far say they will no longer buy at release date.
And this is the official forum for the game, where the fans go.

That, at the very least, should be a huge signal to Bethesda that some long term fans are not happy.


The annoying thing is that these fans don't take into account that these negatives are made up for by positives. From what I know fans have always wanted smithing to customise their armour and yet they just ignore this and quite frankly whine about how the series has been butchered since Morrowind. I never thought it that amazing to run around in mismatched armour and if this a deal breaker to any of you then fine but your the ones missing out.

I am still buying Skyrim and I think the ones who say they aren't are lying unless they really hated Oblivion.
User avatar
Kayleigh Mcneil
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:32 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:37 am

Hey, ever played Fallout: New Vegas? A game that has been known of many fan ideas?

Guess what they did with the ending!

Please Bethesda, don't.

If there's something I've learned from these forums, is that most of the people here don't even know what they're talking about, especially if they think they know more about the game...


Well I must say, your a bright example of that then. Obsidian made fallout new vegas, not Bethesda. I rest my case.

I can see what you mean though, alot of people don't know what they are talking about :goodjob:
User avatar
Danny Blight
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:30 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 10:45 am

To people saying no can i ask why the whole vastness of the game will be ignored by you because of something so minuscule like armour?


Because it's indicative of an overall trend of less less less.

What if they got rid of helmets? It's just one kind of armor, and they hide your characters face anyway. Or what about axes? We already have swords and maces, axes are just kind of a silly sword-mace-thing.

If they got rid of Stealth, they could focus on Combat and Magic and make them both even MORE awesome!
User avatar
Nancy RIP
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:42 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:07 pm

For people who don't consider armour a gamebreaker and would like to play hours and hours of content the game has to offer....ever think of that? No you obviously don't.

I totally wasn't being sarcastic or anything.
User avatar
Misty lt
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 10:06 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:43 pm

I suspect this will be a repeat of the Sims 3 fiasco for me--I knew the face making was messed up, but bought it anyway because of many of the other features I wanted--played it for 2 months, realized then that the limited face making and genetics was a game breaker for me, and went back to Sims 2. I will probably buy Skyrim because otherwise it sounds like an awsome game, but may very well find the armour slots issue to be game breaking.
User avatar
Sammie LM
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 1:59 pm

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:26 pm

I'm still horribly pissed about a few things, but nothing will stop me from buying it.
User avatar
Albert Wesker
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:17 pm

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:31 am

Stupid thread, sorry but its true. If anyone is stupid enough not to buy Skyrim and all its awesomness due to armour well than tisk tisk..... no one cares if they buy it or not. Everyone who whines about the armour and says they will not buy Skyrim due to that is lying, they will buy it if they are true to the series.

no. what is stupid is sticking to a brand just because of the name. with all the news that makes skyrim even more dumbed down from oblivion than oblivion itself was from morrowind, it is justifiable not to buy the game. it is much more stupid to buy it because you liked previous game. its just like people who buy all new iterations of call of duty or the new cool ipod
User avatar
kat no x
 
Posts: 3247
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:39 pm

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:41 pm

I will be buying this game no matter what.
User avatar
hannah sillery
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:13 pm

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:36 pm

The annoying thing is that these fans don't take into account that these negatives are made up for by positives. From what I know fans have always wanted smithing to customise their armour and yet they just ignore this and quite frankly whine about how the series has been butchered since Morrowind. I never thought it that amazing to run around in mismatched armour and if this a deal breaker to any of you then fine but your the ones missing out.

I am still buying Skyrim and I think the ones who say they aren't are lying unless they really hated Oblivion.


If greaves being out were the only thing, I wouldnt care (much).
But its: Some skills and spell effects, spellmaking, attributes, classes, birthsigns, armour slots, and not removing quest and map markers.
And how knows what else that I cant remember right now.
A whole lot of removal. And at a certain point its just too much.

And yeah, Oblivion was a rather horrible game only made playable by the extensive modding community.
User avatar
Flash
 
Posts: 3541
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 3:24 pm

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:04 am

i knew i was going to buy it as soon as i saw it on the screen in december regardless of what happens in between then and the 11th
User avatar
Dan Wright
 
Posts: 3308
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:40 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:07 pm

Of course. I even think the devs may have made a good "trade".

My guess is that Cuirass and Greaves have been combined to make it easier to prevent clipping/modeling issues caused by the new different character body types. I'd gladly take one less armor slot for more character customizability, and different looking NPCs and races.
User avatar
^~LIL B0NE5~^
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:23 pm

no. what is stupid is sticking to a brand just because of the name. with all the news that makes skyrim even more dumbed down from oblivion than oblivion itself was from morrowind, it is justifiable not to buy the game. it is much more stupid to buy it because you liked previous game. its just like people who buy all new iterations of call of duty or the new cool ipod


I don't think the game is dumbing down. Infact its more customisable and free in my own opinion by the fact you don't need to follow the path you set yourself at the start, its more realistic to be able to change and become better at things you do more often. Its not dumbing down but more coming off a more spreadsheet type of gameplay.
User avatar
Lauren Denman
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:29 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:44 pm

Yes. Doesn't bother me.
User avatar
Shiarra Curtis
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:22 pm

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:49 pm

I dislike the idea of armour being consolidated as much as the next person... but come on... :confused: people would actually refuse to buy the game over this?

Bethesda Game Studios sure are lucky to have such a respectable and loyal fanbase. :facepalm:

In fact, it really bothers me that this thread even exists. Developers (who have worked really hard on Skyrim) are going to come on these forums, see this thread, and think their fans are all a bunch of whiney, ungrateful kids willing to turn against the series at any point. What they SHOULD be seeing is intelligent discussions about what people like and dislike, what should be changed, etc. If I were a developer, i'd be more likely to listen to those threads than ones like this.


what are your thoughts on this? http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1202063-are-we-seeing-a-huge-dumbing-down-of-the-game/ yeah i know its locked now
User avatar
Bellismydesi
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:25 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:27 am

Until we learn more about smithing and the potential there for armor customization, I wouldn't freak out about this.

If it was simply OB-style armor with the greaves and cuirass combined, then yes, that would clearly be dumbing down and another unsettling trend in a game that is already looking to be a little too streamlined for the casual gamer. However, if we can make meaningful changes to armor via smithing, which some of the pics seem to indicate given the variation we've seen in pauldrons, etc., then things may not be as bleak as they appear.
User avatar
RAww DInsaww
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 5:47 pm

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 12:48 pm

It may be an overreaction when you look at just this one thing, but for me personally it seems Skyrim has been more -1 with every news that comes out.
Spellmaking, skills, classes, attributes, and now yet another layer of customisation.

And a whole lot of minuses one adds up to a very big negative.

No. I will no longer buy Skyrim at release date.
I will rent it and give it an honest chance. I want it to be a good game and I really want to like it but I am not going to get burned again like with Oblivion, only more so.


What seems to happen is that a lot of people set their expectations at perfection and are disappointed when the game just isn't. Set your expectations at 'better than the previous game' and you won't be disappointed, I can assure you.
User avatar
Stephy Beck
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:33 pm

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 10:03 pm

If greaves being out were the only thing, I wouldnt care (much).
But its: Some skills and spell effects, spellmaking, attributes, classes, birthsigns, armour slots, and not removing quest and map markers.
And how knows what else that I cant remember right now.
A whole lot of removal. And at a certain point its just too much.

And yeah, Oblivion was a rather horrible game only made playable by the extensive modding community.


I generally have trust in Bethesda to make a good game because I love all their previous ones but I understand that if you thought Oblivion was bad you might not buy Skyrim. Only thing on that list which annoys me is quest and map markers.
User avatar
Guinevere Wood
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:06 pm

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 12:55 pm

What seems to happen is that a lot of people set their expectations at perfection and are disappointed when the game just isn't. Set your expectations at 'better than the previous game' and you won't be disappointed, I can assure you.


I totally agree with this and also I think people find more things are missing at first as people ask whats going to still be in the game more than is this "guess" in the game. So much stuff left untouched.
User avatar
saxon
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:45 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:58 am

I'm still pissed off that we're getting less armor slots instead of more. I want more enchanting freedom, and this is taking away a huge part of my experience. Of course this won't stop me from getting the game. It's a whole new province to explore! For that reason alone I'm willing to get every elder scrolls game and explore every nook and cranny in Tamriel.
User avatar
N Only WhiTe girl
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:30 pm

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:37 pm

Seriously 23 people? This isn't a barbie doll game. You can live with 1 less armor slot.
User avatar
Ashley Tamen
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 6:17 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:17 am

So far I'm still getting Skyrim at release, but I'm on the fence about it. A lot of what I've been hearing isn't good, a lot less customization options which is a big part to me in TES. We'll see when more information is released.
User avatar
P PoLlo
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:05 am

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:19 pm

The Merged Armor issue is minor for me . . . many of the the other things about Skyrim have made me decide not to pre-order the game.

The E3 demo reinforced my previous concerns . . . and I was really hoping that wouldn't happen. I'm nearly certain that the main focus in creating Skyrim has been on combat, and on streamlining the rest of the game around combat . . . where every player will be a warrior/mage/thief . . . with no character limitations. That's a HUGE issue for me. And the presence of Oblivion's Fast Travel, and of the Fast Level (along with the rapid skill advancing Perk rewards) leads me to believe that the game is more focused on fast paced gameplay than on in-depth gameplay.

I'm seriously bummed. And I have considered sitting out this TES release, as it is now pretty clear that this is not the TES-V I have been waiting for (just like Oblivion wasn't the TES-IV that I felt it should have been).

But I'm probably still going to buy it . . . but only because I now know how to mod. If I feel that I can fix the game enough . . . AND the end result will be worth the hours and hours of work that this will involve . . . I'll likely buy the game. But I may wait until it drops in price.

If I do end up buying it, I'll mod the heck of out it, and eventually I hope to end up playing my own version of Skyrim, that will be more of the RPG that I had hoped the released version would have been.
User avatar
Barbequtie
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:34 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim