Ashur and Caesar

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:08 am

What am I ignoring exactly? The Pitt is not a livable location. People who are brought there invariably sicken and die and the entire native population is infertile. Yet Ashur has chosen to make it the focal point of his new nation because he's obsessed with a working steel mill.

Ultimate intentions are completely unimportant. No one thinks of themselves as the villain in their own heads. I'm sure Ashur's intentions are good, as are Caesar's, as were Richardson's, as were the Master's yet all of those people were wrong and committing great evil whether they saw it or not.

The difference mostly is that Ashur actually got the Pitt working. A few years back he would have been just another Wasteland upstart trying to found a nation but he actually did it. The Pitt is probably the only faction with heavy industry, I imagine the Pitt could net lots of money by exporting steel and other metals to neighboring societies. Ashur also has a loyal army behind him. Ashur is probably around his 40's so he still has plenty of time to live. He has a very healthy child who will take over after his death. The Pitt is isolated and does not have any real enemies. All is set.

It's very unfortunate that Ashur uses slave labor, but unlike Legion he is putting them to good use. I know I wouldn't want to be a slave but as a 3rd party observer I'd say Ashur is doing everything right. After two centuries of total anarchy, little is truly evil. For all it's worth Ashur shows a lot of remorse for using slave labor, reluctantly declaring "it's just what needs to be done". By the time New Vegas happens, I imagine the Pitt's slaves have already been freed.

Besides, Ashur's motivation is in rebuilding the Pitt, finding a cure to mutations and perhaps found a more centralized, standing army, unlike Caesar who massacres thousands and enslaves the rest just to prove his point. He builds unlike Caesar who just conquers. There is a difference. Like Ashur says it, it's easier to loot a dying city because there isn't a machine that builds it for you.
User avatar
Heather Stewart
 
Posts: 3525
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:04 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:10 pm

Besides, Ashur's motivation is in rebuilding the Pitt, finding a cure to mutations and perhaps found a more centralized, standing army, unlike Caesar who massacres thousands and enslaves the rest just to prove his point. He builds unlike Caesar who just conquers. There is a difference. Like Ashur says it, it's easier to loot a dying city because there isn't a machine that builds it for you.


Again you hit the nail on the head.
User avatar
Ymani Hood
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:22 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 1:32 am

The difference mostly is that Ashur actually got the Pitt working. A few years back he would have been just another Wasteland upstart trying to found a nation but he actually did it. The Pitt is probably the only faction with heavy industry, I imagine the Pitt could net lots of money by exporting steel and other metals to neighboring societies. Ashur also has a loyal army behind him. Ashur is probably around his 40's so he still has plenty of time to live. He has a very healthy child who will take over after his death. The Pitt is isolated and does not have any real enemies. All is set.


Which is great but doesn't change the fact that the Pitt is an unlivable hellhole where a fifth of everyone who inhabits it eventually turns into a ravening monster and reproduction is impossible. You simply can't build a country there no matter how much steel you make. It's a crazy pipe dream. Ashur has the ability and strength to build a functioning society one that wouldn't even need slave labor to survive but he won't because he's obsessed with a steel mill. Heavy industry isn't a necessity for rebuilding civilization.

It's very unfortunate that Ashur uses slave labor, but unlike Legion he is putting them to good use. I know I wouldn't want to be a slave but as a 3rd party observer I'd say Ashur is doing everything right. After two centuries of total anarchy, little is truly evil. For all it's worth Ashur shows a lot of remorse for using slave labor, reluctantly declaring "it's just what needs to be done". By the time New Vegas happens, I imagine the Pitt's slaves have already been freed.


Slavery has a way of perpetuating itself within a society. I'm sure Ashur regrets having to use slavery. I'm equally sure that between using slavery and clinging to his dream of turning the Pitt into a functioning state he'll keep bringing in slaves until he dies and those who take over won't have his moral compunctions about it. It's what they've always known. Even assuming slavery was somehow abolished the tensions between the former slaves and their masters won't suddenly go away. That's going to end in blood sooner or later.

Besides, Ashur's motivation is in rebuilding the Pitt, finding a cure to mutations and perhaps found a more centralized, standing army, unlike Caesar who massacres thousands and enslaves the rest just to prove his point. He builds unlike Caesar who just conquers. There is a difference. Like Ashur says it, it's easier to loot a dying city because there isn't a machine that builds it for you.


Caesar thinks he's building too. Both want to see a better society develop out of what they're doing. Both have plans that are insane and don't make much sense outside their own heads however. Ashur's is slightly more reasonable but that's not saying much in comparison to Caesar.
User avatar
gandalf
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:57 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:11 pm

Heavy industry isn't a necessity for rebuilding civilization.


Your starting to sound like the "economists" that contributed to the Recession. The fact is you can't have a sustainable strong civilization without manufacturing. One of the reasons Carthage almost destroyed Rome was because of their mercantile muscle, not their Numidian mercenaries.
User avatar
Ice Fire
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:27 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:34 pm

I like Caesar but Ashur was incredibly done.

He hates what he is doing but he's doing it for the good of his slaves and his daughter.
User avatar
Tikarma Vodicka-McPherson
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:15 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:33 pm

Caesar: He built the second largest faction in the known wasteland.

Ashur is just a crazy guy that would wish he could be Caesar if he knew about him.
User avatar
Mistress trades Melissa
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:28 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:41 am

Your starting to sound like the "economists" that contributed to the Recession. The fact is you can't have a sustainable strong civilization without manufacturing. One of the reasons Carthage almost destroyed Rome was because of their mercantile muscle, not their Numidian mercenaries.


What? I don't even understand what most of this in reference to. Yes it's good for developed societies to have industry. But Ashur doesn't have a developed society yet. He's neglected everything beyond running a steel mill. Ashur's built a factory that's reliant on continual infusions of slave labor to survive not a nation. Societies don't develop around factories factories develop around societies.
User avatar
I’m my own
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:55 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:35 pm

Ceaser just thinks he can take anything he wants, while Ashur is more realistic.
User avatar
clelia vega
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:04 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:43 pm

The votes for Ashur have been steadily been 2-1 throughout the whole voting process. I think its safe to say Ashur fills a void that Caesar fails to fill.
User avatar
MatthewJontully
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:33 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:22 pm

caesar pwns
User avatar
Jonathan Montero
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:22 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:24 pm

What am I ignoring exactly? The Pitt is not a livable location. People who are brought there invariably sicken and die and the entire native population is infertile. Yet Ashur has chosen to make it the focal point of his new nation because he's obsessed with a working steel mill.

Well if you free the slaves it's not like they depart from that place. So obviously it has some appeal.

The votes for Ashur have been steadily been 2-1 throughout the whole voting process. I think its safe to say Ashur fills a void that Caesar fails to fill.

Actually I don't think they are similar in role.

Caesar is hoping to create a unified US-spanning nation without the differences of old, while Ashur just wants to build a prospering nation.
User avatar
Paula Rose
 
Posts: 3305
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:12 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:43 pm

Caesar is hoping to create a unified US-spanning nation without the differences of old, while Ashur just wants to build a prospering nation.


Which is why Ashur's plan is saner and more likely to work. Marcus said it best when queried about the Legion... it basically amounted to "Been there, done that... didn't work the first time."
User avatar
Tamara Primo
 
Posts: 3483
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 7:15 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:11 am

I voted for Ashur only because he is a more interesting character because of his motivations and problems he faces. Caeser and his Legion svck but aren't really that odd in the Fallout universe. I mean come on, we have mutants running around because of a forced evolutionary virus, a faction of techno-religious nutjobs living in bunkers, zombies from 200 years ago running around, and of course a Legion of robots under the command of a 235 year old CEO in a chamber. So now are you all saying that the Neo-Roman slaving organization is to much? Come on. The breaking point shouldn't even been that. In any case I dislike the lore of the Legion only because we weren't given a proper look into cilivan areas, otherwise it might be a different story.
User avatar
Marcin Tomkow
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:31 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:42 am

Well if you free the slaves it's not like they depart from that place. So obviously it has some appeal.


Clearly not enough to attract willing labor. Which is pretty understandable considering you have a 1 in 5 chance of turning into a monster, are guaranteed to contract some form of a disfiguring disease and cannot have children. All the steel in the world doesn't change that.
User avatar
Steph
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:44 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:01 pm

I voted for Ashur only because he is a more interesting character because of his motivations and problems he faces. Caeser and his Legion svck but aren't really that odd in the Fallout universe. I mean come on, we have mutants running around because of a forced evolutionary virus, a faction of techno-religious nutjobs living in bunkers, zombies from 200 years ago running around, and of course a Legion of robots under the command of a 235 year old CEO in a chamber. So now are you all saying that the Neo-Roman slaving organization is to much? Come on. The breaking point shouldn't even been that. In any case I dislike the lore of the Legion only because we weren't given a proper look into cilivan areas, otherwise it might be a different story.


It's not that it's simply ridiculous. It's that ridiculous in a different way. It's ridiculous that we have giant scorpions running around with deadly venom. But that fits perfectly well with the post-apocalyptic Science! nature of the Fallout universe. How do Romans fit into that?
User avatar
Katey Meyer
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:14 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:37 pm

Honestly Pistolero beat me to anything I could have possibly said on the subject. Ashur is more "agreeable" in almost every way than Caesar, and to this day I've been unable to side with Wehrner. I would have loved to have helped the slaves at the same time but when the entire premise of doing so is handing a baby over to an unqualified imbecile, unfortunately I must choke down a section of my moral code and let Ashur stay in command. Advancements in radiation sickness therapy and medicine, a problem besetting the entire nation in places and the fact that he feels legitimate remorse about what he's forced to stoop to in order to get it done sits better with me.

Plus as always, it's a single player game and only my world matters to me in the end so I'm free to envision that the Lone Wanderer of mine tells Ashur that he can continue - for now - but if things start to run in a disagreeable fashion again, he can kiss his sub-faction goodbye.
User avatar
asako
 
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:16 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:23 pm

Ashur, definitely. One of the gems of Fallout 3. Ashur is a leader, knows his limits, and isn't a delusional idiot who gets kicks for oppressing minorities. Pitt will definitely become NCR-like powerhouse on the East Coast in the long run. Truly, the only faction I appreciate besides the Enclave.

Thanks Pistolero for breaking up your argument into paragraphs. Anyways...Caesar isn't really delusional if he created an army the size of the NCR, is he? Caesar couldn't care less whether or not he enslaves women. All he cares about is the Dam and the ascension of his Legion into a true Empire. As for Super Mutants and ghoul enslavement? Well you support the Enclave so your position is really not on stable foundation if you mean bigotry.

I never really liked Caesar's Legion. It's explained well and all but I can't help but to think it's just too over-the-top for the setting. They are organized but they have serious fundamental flaws ranging from class society to having the nation as personal property of its founder (Caesar constantly refers to the Legion as "his" Legion, and naming a nation after yourself will lead to problems after you die). Really, the only good side in the Legion is that they like killing, includes raiders. Other than that, they are the worst thing to walk the Wasteland since Master's Army.

Caesar is not a person. Caesar is a title. So long as Caesar lives, the Legion will live. Doesn't matter if Sallow dies, so long as Lanius can gracefully become Caesar. Do I want Lanius to become Caesar? Nope. He's not a fit leader. But really, does Caesar even know that he's going to die in a few months with that little tumor? He just wanted a savage general to lead the Legion to victory, not for Lanius to become the leader of the Legion.

Even Caesar himself doesn't want Lanius to be leader. But he does understand his mortality at least and after Caesar's death, well if a suitable leader (Lucius maybe?) comes forth and gracefully becomes Caesar, then the Legion will function just as before.

As for your last sentence, that really is opinion based more than fact. Caesar's Legion brings firm control from a militaristic visionary and somebody who has the strength and intelligence of leading an empire. Legion really isn't survival of the strongest. It's survival of the fittest, which does make sense.

If you can serve the Legion in your own way, then you live. If you can't, you die. For a world that's rebuilding, it's a necessary misfortune. Oh and my evidence for survival of the fittest is the blacksmiths, scouts, and other Legionaries who aren't necessarily fighters. According to the Fallout wikia, the Legion picks specialists rather than the strongest of the bunch.


Legion isn't a long term society. It lives on blood and it will run out sooner or later. We only have Caesar's word that things will become better after Vegas is his. But I wonder how many times he has said that? Caesar is the guy who wages total war even he will die of cancer unless the Courier saves his sorry ass.

Caesar isn't a liar when it comes to his own Legion. Remember, he wouldn't gain anything if the Legion stayed as it is. He'll gain much more of what he wants when the Legion is an empire with citizens, taxes, and an actual social structure. Now what does he want anyways?

Really, Caesar isn't in it for the fortune and if he is, he sure doesn't show it. He's in it for the legacy and power. That a thousand years from 2281, children will be taught that the first emperor of the nation that revitalized the Wasteland was Edward Sallow, the First Caesar.

So keeping that in mind, Caesar will be good to create an empire. Why? An empire is less vulnerable to a total wipe out than a tribe. While a tribe can be conquered and be forgotten, an empire can live on forever until all records of that empire also is destroyed. Even then, hundreds of years later, the remnants of that empire will be unearthed. Just like the Mayan civilization or the Ancient Rome Civilization.

But more importantly, Caesar controlling an empire gives him more power. It would make no sense that he'd continue keeping a tribe when an intact and ready Capital City is there and begging for it to be used as a Rome.


User avatar
Khamaji Taylor
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:15 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:53 pm

Hmm my votes for Ashur, definitely not the big power house Caesars legion is in its prime. But his priorities are more realistic and down to earth. Imagine Ashur with all the resources of caesar and all his slaves and power. He would definitely put it to better use than Caesar slaughtering half his slaves. He could have probably built a functional sufficient nation. Caesar just wants to conquer everyone and destroy anyone in his path.
User avatar
Smokey
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 11:35 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:41 pm

Anyways...Caesar isn't really delusional if he created an army the size of the NCR, is he?


Right....how many delusional men have raised an army? Too many to count.

Caesar isn't a liar when it comes to his own Legion.


*cough*....Joshua Graham...
User avatar
Louise Lowe
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:08 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:18 pm

If you really went onto the wiki and read 5 pages of lore about each person, im sure id have decided, however for now im just going to say i Caesar beacause i just know more about him.

Sure, he thinks he thinks hes a "god" and some crap about mars, but thats what lore is. I mean, thay added so much story behind Caeser, however messed up it may be, plus it Caesar seems alot more familier to me, plus iv been playing Fallout NV more then Fallout 3, so iv been learned more about Caesar.
User avatar
Roanne Bardsley
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:57 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:38 am

The difference mostly is that Ashur actually got the Pitt working. A few years back he would have been just another Wasteland upstart trying to found a nation but he actually did it. The Pitt is probably the only faction with heavy industry, I imagine the Pitt could net lots of money by exporting steel and other metals to neighboring societies. Ashur also has a loyal army behind him. Ashur is probably around his 40's so he still has plenty of time to live. He has a very healthy child who will take over after his death. The Pitt is isolated and does not have any real enemies. All is set.


The NCR has a considerable heavy industrial base...they are building railroads and the equipment to refurbish Hoover Dam. Ashur mentions that Ronto has a strong military, they probably have at least a small industrial base. The Pitt most likely has the largest industrial base East of the Mississippi, though. He;s gotta be using that steel for something...if not trade goods perhaps to make machine tools, ect to lay the groundwork for a sustainable tech and industrial base before the Pre-War facilities fail.

It's very unfortunate that Ashur uses slave labor, but unlike Legion he is putting them to good use. I know I wouldn't want to be a slave but as a 3rd party observer I'd say Ashur is doing everything right. After two centuries of total anarchy, little is truly evil. For all it's worth Ashur shows a lot of remorse for using slave labor, reluctantly declaring "it's just what needs to be done". By the time New Vegas happens, I imagine the Pitt's slaves have already been freed.

Besides, Ashur's motivation is in rebuilding the Pitt, finding a cure to mutations and perhaps found a more centralized, standing army, unlike Caesar who massacres thousands and enslaves the rest just to prove his point. He builds unlike Caesar who just conquers. There is a difference. Like Ashur says it, it's easier to loot a dying city because there isn't a machine that builds it for you.


Eddie wants to build a Totalitarian State that will condition future generations to blindly worship him as a God....Ashur is trying to build a society that will give future generations the luxury to condemn his methods. I found Ashur more compelling as a leader...he started out with nothing but a battered suit of T-47d and a family of scavengers, while Eddie more or less got to where he was via treachery. And who would you rather follow....a guy who takes out enemies by killing thier leaders in single combat or some cos-player wannabe "God" hiding behind his bodyguards.
User avatar
Bonnie Clyde
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:02 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:29 pm

If Ashur had Caesar's numbers, they'd probably just haul all the stuff they need to rebuild away from the contaminated hellhole that is The Pitt. Caesar, if he had seen and wanted the Pitt, wouldn't have given a [censored]. He'd have just gone in, taken it, and made people suffer and die for his benefit with none of Ashur's remorse - "Oh well they're gonna sicken and die, that's the way of all flesh, no attempts to save the lives of anyone - except for the Narcissistic Nonce-Queen Edward Sallow.. hey, that's me!"

While my conscience cannot fully agree with Ashur's actions, I can at least understand what he is doing. I understand that most emerging societies were built on slavery, although I detest it. His desire to end the slave cycle could be combined with the view that the people he's buying were already enslaved - at least here they have a chance.

He's a much more sympathetic character than Caesar, lore or no lore. In fact, the Lore makes Caesar into even more of an insufferable human turd. It speaks volumes to my loathing for the character that I chose to retire my only attempt at a legion playthrough after choosing the Elijah end of Dead Money.
User avatar
Jarrett Willis
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:01 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:29 am

Eddie wants to build a Totalitarian State that will condition future generations to blindly worship him as a God....Ashur is trying to build a society that will give future generations the luxury to condemn his methods. I found Ashur more compelling as a leader...he started out with nothing but a battered suit of T-47d and a family of scavengers, while Eddie more or less got to where he was via treachery. And who would you rather follow....a guy who takes out enemies by killing thier leaders in single combat or some cos-player wannabe "God" hiding behind his bodyguards.


Absolutely lol about Caesar hiding behind his body guards comment. The guy is all mouth and no balls.
User avatar
Claire Vaux
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:56 am

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:44 pm

Pitt slavers have nothing on the Legion. They have a larger army, are better organized and have a much larger goal and purpose.
User avatar
Emmi Coolahan
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:14 pm

Post » Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:49 pm

I never did figure out the psychological profile of Ceasar....from the followers to tyrant..seems a wierd road.

and it would have been nice to know why caesar picked rome over the mongols who sacked rome. My guess is he liked the boys in skirts thing!
User avatar
SiLa
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 7:52 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout: New Vegas