thats even worse No that would be forced separation of the player base. Its a choice and people have a right to make a choice to either use or not . as I said it can be disabled. you people can not restrict choice and people 's right to play the game they want to. Its wrong and borders on slavery when it comes to online gaming. Crytek better leave it in the game or online gaming might as well be a modern form of slavery where the only way to play is under the rules of a certain few that believe their way of playing the game is the only way.

Drama queen much? According to your flawed logic, people wanting to play without auto aim are now forced to play with people that play with auto aim, how's that freedom of choice? Oh wait, YOU don't want it, so everybody should play it like YOU want it, which is exactly what you say you don't want? Hypocrite.

thats even worse No that would be forced separation of the player base. Its a choice and people have a right to make a choice to either use or not . as I said it can be disabled. you people can not restrict choice and people 's right to play the game they want to. Its wrong and borders on slavery when it comes to online gaming. Crytek better leave it in the game or online gaming might as well be a modern form of slavery where the only way to play is under the rules of a certain few that believe their way of playing the game is the only way.

Drama queen much? According to your flawed logic, people wanting to play without auto aim are now forced to play with people that play with auto aim, how's that freedom of choice? Oh wait, YOU don't want it, so everybody should play it like YOU want it, which is exactly what you say you don't want? Hypocrite.


I never said anyone was forced to use auto aim. what I said was the idea of restricting or removing player choice is wrong. Auto aim is in the game and it can be disabled. if one does not wish to use it . you must be like the rest on here want to remove game content that is wrong. Online gaming is a modern day form of a dictatorship the only difference is its ran by a small group of ass holes that enjoy imposing their rules of game play on us all. I want players to have a choice in how they play the game and not take anything away from them or nerf things. you stupid pathetic so called hardcoe gamers really think your something you are nothing but a bunch of **** bullies.

I never said anyone was forced to use auto aim. what I said was the idea of restricting or removing player choice is wrong. Auto aim is in the game and it can be disabled. if one does not wish to use it . you must be like the rest on here want to remove game content that is wrong. Online gaming is a modern day form of a dictatorship the only difference is its ran by a small group of ass holes that enjoy imposing their rules of game play on us all. I want players to have a choice in how they play the game and not take anything away from them or nerf things. you stupid pathetic so called hardcoe gamers really think your something you are nothing but a bunch of **** bullies.

How can it be dictatorship when there is polls to see what people thoughts are?
It's pure Democracy
besides i think the rest of us that voted option 2 only wants it removed on multiplayer part.

or atleast they should make the aim-assist so that it aims on the enemies feet instead of chest and head, the current aim assist now is almost like using aimbot

Its a choice in the game but when one group wants to remove a option that can already be disabled if one wants it off that is the start of a dictatorship its imposing rules and what someone can use in a game. its the same thing that has been done in all the other shooters remove and nerf what one group does not like or thinks is over powered. a democracy is about freedom and choices in this case its not that you people want to start having things removed or nerfed to serve your own playstyle.

I would just like to say to those that use autoaim that you must not fear to turn it off because you can be a good player and have fun even without it.

ppl talkin about dictatorships and ****... wtf? this is a forum, we are putting our votes in and hopefully if a change is made, majority will rule. so far... more people want it gone than want it to stay... serious gamers make up for most of the market for FPS games, and serious gamers dont want to cater to newbs. Not because we dont care about you newbs, but because we want a challenge. but we dont want to be bringing a knife to a gunfight either.

autoaim isnt that intrusive in crysis 2. i think its not a big deal

This. I typed something similar on the first page. The auto-aim is no where near as noticebale as it is in COD. If auto aim is your biggest problem with Crysis 2 then you are one lucky bastard.

I don't have a problem with getting rid of it completely or keeping it for everyone, as long as its the same for everyone. But i do have a problem with people who turn it off and then complain about people who don't. if you want to be an elitist I suggest you make your way to the PC forum.

As i said earlier it is a feature of console shooters to make it more playable due to the inherent inaccuracy of thumbsticks over a mouse.

autoaim isnt that intrusive in crysis 2. i think its not a big deal

This. I typed something similar on the first page. The auto-aim is no where near as noticebale as it is in COD. If auto aim is your biggest problem with Crysis 2 then you are one lucky bastard.

I don't have a problem with getting rid of it completely or keeping it for everyone, as long as its the same for everyone. But i do have a problem with people who turn it off and then complain about people who don't. if you want to be an elitist I suggest you make your way to the PC forum.

As i said earlier it is a feature of console shooters to make it more playable due to the inherent inaccuracy of thumbsticks over a mouse.


to be totally honest ive never really noticed much of an auto aim in COD. I mean im sure its there, but the AA in C2 will actually follow an enemy at breakneck speeds in a 180 turn as he slides behind you. I mean thats damn near aim botting....

to be totally honest ive never really noticed much of an auto aim in COD. I mean im sure its there, but the AA in C2 will actually follow an enemy at breakneck speeds in a 180 turn as he slides behind you. I mean thats damn near aim botting....


That's exactly what i mean

Can somebody post a video of the auto aim in action? When I have it enabled and I just don't see it doing anything worth while.

I've tried it on and off... I don't know what you guys are doing, but I can't (no matter how hard I try) get my reticle to follow the enemy around with my own input. A couple of times I notice that it snaps towards the enemy but only if I'm slightly off.. By slightly off I mean within a head length or so because if I aim a couple of feet to either side of them it just aims exactly where I point it.

not to sound mean or nothin, but if you havent seen what the auto aim can do, perhaps you are having difficulty putting an enemy in your sights at all. either that, or you just havent had enough game time in. Its there, and its obvious. I dont think people would complain about a non existent issue, do you?

ppl talkin about dictatorships and ****... wtf? this is a forum, we are putting our votes in and hopefully if a change is made, majority will rule. so far... more people want it gone than want it to stay... serious gamers make up for most of the market for FPS games, and serious gamers dont want to cater to newbs. Not because we dont care about you newbs, but because we want a challenge. but we dont want to be bringing a knife to a gunfight either.

How did you come to the conclusion that more people want it removed? Where can I find the definitive results for both demographics?

not to sound mean or nothin, but if you havent seen what the auto aim can do, perhaps you are having difficulty putting an enemy in your sights at all. either that, or you just havent had enough game time in. Its there, and its obvious. I dont think people would complain about a non existent issue, do you?
Would people complain about a non-existant issue? **** yeah they would.

I haven't done enough sliding around to notice, but in my opinion the AA is much more noticeable in COD. If someone is in your hipfire crosshairs in COD the crosshairs quite often move on their own, following the enemy. I haven't noticed that in C2.

Not to sound mean but if you haven't noticed the AA in COD then..... i don't know how to finish that sentence.

Also if you are sliding around and the AA is turning 180 degrees for you then thats pretty concerning, but if you are witnessing that in a kill-cam I wouldn't rely on that as an accurate recording of what the other person did

well i dont play COD so my experience is limited to the few times i have at a friends house. a few hours at best. I havent like COD since the original MW... with its ridiculous "martyrdom" perk lol but anyways, I did recognize it, but its very slight. and more of a "drag" type aim enhancer than anything. I think the reason its more noticable on C2 is because this game is capable of some really fast movements. And when you see your screen moving around like that knowing you arent behind the wheel, you start losing confidence in the skill of your opponents. As it stands right now, im a fairly good player, with or without the auto aim. I just stay at further distance with it off. I have witnessed the lock-on myself with my own character, and already know that kill cams are unreliable. Half the time im looking at a kill cam it shows him aiming a few inches away from me on the kill shot. So yes i personally vouch for the lunacy of the aim feature. I always feel rotten when i get a kill that was that badly assisted.

As for the "demographic"... add your opinion to the poll above and see for yourself. As for the world census, ask me if i give a ****. those people obviously dont care enough to be here putting their opinion up for others to see, and thus arent included in my judgement. But so far, its about a 2 to 1 vote... right here and now... in protest of the auto aim.

29 votes in a clearly biased thread are not definitive results.

The odds are 2 to 1, sure. However, the votes of 20 people (at the time of this post) aren't enough to warrant a change that would dramatically impact the experience of thousands of players.

well if they dont remove it, they should segregate it. let the news auto aim the newbs, and let the big boys have their competition matches.

Too bad this game will NEVER be MLG material. EVER. With the current bugs + gitches and **** fps + resolution, they really fked it up by releasing it unfinished.

To put this in perspective... Even BlackOps made it to MLG... that's saying something.

wtf are you talking about?

http://gamebattles.com/ps3/crysis-2/

Oh wow. I can't believe it LOL I stand corrected and look like a tool.

I can't believe MLG would even consider it... I understand for PC, but for PS3 and Xbox360? really? I'm disappointed.

Do you:

A. Love the color blue
B. Hate the color red and love the color purple


The poll is flawed. I don't agree with either option. Aim assist doesn't make the game control itself, in fact I can't really see much of a difference at all with it on/off. I don't care if the game has it because aim assist (at least in this game) doesn't make you win when you shouldn't have. I kill plenty of people that are no doubt using aim assist because the effect of it is pretty subtle. Skill will always beat a proper aim assist.

wtf are you talking about?

http://gamebattles.com/ps3/crysis-2/

Is this being considered for MLG, or Gamebattles alone?

Oh wow. I can't believe it LOL I stand corrected and look like a tool.

I can't believe MLG would even consider it... I understand for PC, but for PS3 and Xbox360? really? I'm disappointed.


rofl i think MLG is open to anything competitive. the game DOES have a lot of issues, but it IS very early to nix it out for them, as they can still make a comeback with a solid patch. The game is great, and very competitive. I think people are just pissed because, as mentioned in so many other posts, NOBODY from staff has even acknowledged the situation. This leads people to believe there may never be a patch. But one common trend is that while many complain, most always give their complaint with a "the game is great, but...." so i really think once the issues are solved it will gain its place in the pantheon with the others.

isnt gamebattles the bulk of what MLG is known for?

one thing to take into consideration when deducing what is "recognized" in any global standard, is that games like COD have built a name for themselves that people like the games even when they are garbage JUST because it uses that name... same reason people still buy Mercedes cars... not because they are quality vehicles anymore lol and if there is a competition gaming force in the FPS world, COD, no matter how **** the installment, will ALWAYS be a part of it... its just an unwritten law amongst the corporate titans (otherwise known as funded subjugation)

or such is the common belief amongst the conspiracy theorists lol but i believe it. corporations dont do a good job of hiding their backdoor dealings anymore.

Ya autoaim can be really annoying because when your invisible it gives you away and when people melee you they are attached to your head.., ITS GAY