Slightly better doesn't cut it after how long it has taken and how much technology has improved. Don't know if you got the news flash, but PC Gamers were an afterthought in the whole creation of the game. PC < PS3 < X360. Half-Life 1 might have looked better. hahahah. Playing on Extreme settings, I still fail to see how this game was supposed to make my system stop in its tracks. High frame rates and max settings and still the game looks subpar to console games? ha.


Actually, I think PS3 was the lead platform, not Xbox. But it doesn't matter. PC looks the best (obviously). The game is fun. Everyone is just whining and being selfish because it's multiplat.

the only people that are biching over this game are stupid PC elitists. just because crysis 2 isn't the perfect benchmark for their monster pc with a 500$ GPU in it and the multiplayer seems to them too much call-of-duty'ish, sorry that's quite retarded.

I'm having a blast with this awesome game, really never had that much fun playing a fps. and btw I finished crysis 1 with everything on very high and I like the graphics style of its successor more. the lighting effects are far more realistic, objects cause 3D waves when they hit water (if I remember correctly this wasn't implemented in the first one), reflections are much better, textures are the same with little differences (you can't argue that crysis 1 also had crappy textures..) believe me, I'm playing at 720p resolution and this game looks outstanding.

oh and controls with a 360 gamepad are superb imo.

so instead of whining and overfilling the forum with crybaby threads, play the game or just leave it!