I know, I know why solve a problem that isn't there, right?

Well, this issue is subtle perhaps, but it would have made a more satisfying experience in my opinion.


*** Suggestion: define damage reduction by armor as:
[damage] / ([damage] + [armor])

as opposed to the current rate of ([armor]+[hidden armor])*0.012

The difference?

1. heavy vs light armor would always make a difference. (Otherwise, in the beginning of the game, for example, best heavy vs light armor only brings a few percentage points of difference in damage reduction.)

2. There would be no such thing as an armor cap. The better, heavier armors would always provide a (slightly) larger damage reduction. Armor would be more than a simple aesthetic choice.

---

Similarly, make elemental reduction a similar armor-like system:

e.g. for fire damage:
reduction rate = [fire damage] / ( [fire damage] + [fire resistance])

==> You never reach a cap; and a minute resistance in the beginning does actually make a difference.


Naturally, all this would require a re-balancing that cannot be done short of a massive mod or TESVI...