Well, I can't really give you an example of someone famous, because they would then cease to be country girls...

Hmm.. they're those farmer types, you know? Who live in ranches, and ride horses after school and what-not.

Any query on Google gives me something too 'inappropriate' to put up here.

Now THAT is beauty.

:facepalm:

What? Why hand you your head so?

disregard.

Because I can't believe I hadn't thought of (and said) the same thing earlier.

I see what you did there.
And no, I'm not 14. Almost 22.


Both of those woman are obviously quite beautiful as well.

Beauty is hard thing. There are different types. The project runway type of beauty is terrible though your right. Myself I think natural beauty is the best. Celebrities who have plastic surgery to look good just look bad to me. All those Angelina Jolie types in Hollywood are nasty. They look really fake. Its unnatural beauty. To me these girls are like perfect examples of beauty.

http://images.movieplayer.it/2009/01/13/lily-loveless-e-naomi-campbell-nella-terza-stagione-della-serie-tv-skins-101797.jpg

http://i48.tinypic.com/rubhgj.jpg

http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/2009/04/katy-perry-july08-nc1.jpg

None of these people have had plastic surgery. Yes they wear makeup but not huge amounts of it. Lets compare what I consider beautiful to what Hollwood does.

http://s467.photobucket.com/albums/rr33/markovandemon/?action=view¤t=tumblr_l4q22oCVs11qbe1sho1_500.jpg

http://forums.speedguide.net/picture.php?albumid=43&pictureid=426

I dunno bout you, but for me Lily Loveless wins every single time. Were not even taking personality into account here.

i know they aint as curvy as the cartoon representation of the 40s, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yy5THitqPBw
also notice what other girl is in this clip...

I never really liked them that much tbh, also unlike others I doubt you will see many people like that today.

I can think of about three girls I know that look similar to either of those two.

My mistake then.

thats the thing...only three, i wish more class and sophistication would find its way to Hollywood, or more importantly the world, but no...

Maybe your area is full of unsophisticated troglodytes.

Ok. First things first. Angelina Jolie is not a female. He is a serpent. (and also a man)
Second thing, Lily..Loveless? looks like a 15 year old boy going through puberty. IMO, that is. My pecks are bigger than her chest.

Yeah lots of other looks are popular, im not into some either, the main thing around here seems to be pretty much bathing in fake tan. It dosent even look that good imo, I like pale skin, and unlike fake tan its usually one shade.

I just think she looks too young in the second picture. In the first one she looks like my Criminal Law tutor. :blink:

Most of fashion? Yeah, not beautiful. I don't know why any women would want to turn into 99% of those kinds of women.

Most celebrity actresses? Yeah, not that beautiful.

My type of beauty would be most often found in, say, the models of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edition. But only the hot ones.

I understand, the whole Emo/scene look...meh...I am neutral to the look in some parts, but the main attitude among these people is not what i find attractive at all. there are some other looks, but i cant think right now..

Jessica Alba.

That is all.

Yeah, there are some super hot scene chicks.

There are lots of diverse types of beauty out there, and a large portion of "beauty" is really attitude and carriage of the body. A lot of models learn what poses accentuate what part of the body, what their "good shots" look like. And in many cases with photo shoots they have photographers to help them get into those positions.

So a seemingly "average" girl in the hands of a good photographer and stylist to accentuate certain features can wind up looking surprisingly good.

But unfortunately a lot of women won't know this and think they are really ugly, when actually they are very good looking.

I think Emma Watson has a lot of natural beauty. It's not too Hollywood, if you know what I'm saying. But by God, put a little eye make up on that girl and she's fire.

There's a school of thought that says our modern standards of beauty were caused by romanticising http://www.gravity.org/mythology/nefertiti3.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Inconnue_de_la_Seine.

Prior to that, you see a lot of Victorian art that idealises women with very rounded faces and heavy set bodies, before you get the Georgian tastes for Nefertiti's strong jawed angular face that would have been seen as "manly" by earlier generations.

In many ways, our "modern" image of beauty has more in common with the ancients.

Never learned the difference between scene/emo, but by atttitude do you mean the general personality they seem to have ? If so I cant comment much, but emo girls tend to be a bit immature for my liking, and the emo guy I knew was just an [censored].

I more like Victorian Art at one point, but i moved forward to the more sophisticated women of the 1940s.

but ROY, i find a few ok emo/scene girls, but the http://totallylookslike.com/2009/04/20/scene-girl-totally-looks-like-a-papillon/

@ this isny my name: yes, the personality to me seemed a bit different. one was immature, the other didnt quite believe in anything...and the other just...just was not to my taste.