Is becoming a Volkihar vampire justifiable?

Post » Fri May 24, 2013 8:22 pm

Something I'm wondering about how to canonize my character. One of my save files with her had her joining Clan Volkihar in the hopes of somehow being able to influence them to aid her in other areas, and also living forever. After the inevitable disappointment on the first front, as I can't even count the castle as a residence (also beating Dawnguard way too early, at level 20, thus making Vyrthur and Harkon into low-powered paper tigers), I started wondering about the morality of this.

I don't believe that becoming a vampire is inherently immoral... my only motivation for it was immortality, not the allure of preying on people. However, the Volkihar are clearly up to some rather immoral things themselves, if the human cattle are any indication. If I control the clan after dealing with Harkon, I'd love to be able to reform it, but I'm not sure how I'd go about rationalizing this. The quests themselves aren't necessarily as bad; even the radiant one involving framing the Dawnguard is all right if you get the Markarth quest, as one of the prominent citizens you can murder is a member of Namira's cannibal cult (something that seems downright quaint to a vampire lord). However, after playing with the Dawnguard in another file, I grew to dislike ruining them, as they seem like decent people overall... I also wasn't fond of enthralling that Moth Priest.

User avatar
Emmanuel Morales
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 2:03 pm

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 2:36 am

as morally justifiable? Since you really just focus on killing other vampires, yeah. Its doable but needs lots of RP

They are really just meant to be the evil choice with the dawnguard being the good choice

User avatar
Laura Hicks
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 5:04 am

Anything is morally justifiable. To assume otherwise is a fallacy of the mortal mind and perception.

User avatar
Kirsty Collins
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:54 pm

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 4:09 am

...It's more justifiable (To me, at least) if you do it from the RP standpoint of your character wanting to be with Serana. Love usually works at justifying anything. It's how I justified a lot of the stupid actions my characters have done. But in the end, it's obvious which side is less evil. Can you live with your actions? Can you?! CAN YOU?!?!

User avatar
Sanctum
 
Posts: 3524
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:29 am

Post » Fri May 24, 2013 10:57 pm

Your dilemma in a nutshell is thinking: Volkihar and Dawnguard. All actions are justifiable, but they also have consequences; are you willing to make a small sacrifice to achieve immortality at its finest?

User avatar
Anthony Santillan
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 6:42 am

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 12:19 am

Power is justifiable. If you're working towards a good goal, the ends justify the means...........

User avatar
Jeneene Hunte
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:18 pm

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 5:31 am

Power resides where men believe it resides.No, wait, wrong quote.
A man is judged by how he treats his inferiors.Yes, that's the one.Do you treat them like human beings, or cattle?

User avatar
Jessica White
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 5:03 am

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 12:07 am

Is a Lion hunting a Gazelle evil? Of course not.

So why is a Vampire hunting its prey evil?

Perspective. Mortals would view it as evil as they are the prey, Vampires would view it as the cycle of life. In the grand scheme of things it is simply a predator feeding on its prey.

There really isn't anything immoral about it.

User avatar
Trevor Bostwick
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:51 am

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 7:47 am

I think the part where vampires are undead abominations sired by Molag Bal just to spit in Arkay's face is a pretty good reason why they'd be seen as evil monsters. In all the games, there are a handful of vampires who aren't monsters (Serana, Sybil, Janus, that one chap locked up in Oblivion), but it's generally clear that vampires are essentially malevolent, daedra-wrought parasites (Jakben Imbel, the Morrowind vampire clans, the Volkihar in general, Morvarth).

User avatar
Yonah
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 4:42 am

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 8:21 am

There is nothing evil about the Volkihar. They see humans the same way humans see chickens/goats/cattle etc, as meat to feast on, something which is part of the cycle of life. The only way someone could see the Volkihar as evil is if they believe in that "Humanity is sacred" nonesense. If the Volkihar is evil then so are all meat eating humans. As a meat eater myself, I refuse to judge the Volkihar and in the process make myself a hypocrite.
User avatar
Alada Vaginah
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:31 pm

Post » Fri May 24, 2013 10:26 pm

Spoiler
Besides Vampirism is a disease, it's quite stupid to think, that "You're evil, becouse you're diseased". Also you need the blood to survive, if you don't kill anyone during "the bite", It should be fine.

User avatar
Timara White
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:39 am

Post » Fri May 24, 2013 10:25 pm

I like how everyone forgets how vampires were created, and how they're essentially intelligent viruses. The idea of vampires being part of some natural 'cycle of life' deal is ludicrous. They were specifically created to spite Arkay, god of the cycle of life and death. They're spawned by a virulent magical disease. Their patron deity is essentially a godlike Marquis de Sade.

How in any way does this make vampires part of the 'cycle of life'?

User avatar
Bethany Short
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:47 am

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 2:39 am

Personally, I don't think it really matters. Whatever happens to exist is natural, to me. Also, I think Sanguine is more like de Sade; Molag Bal is far worse. However, you don't know at the time of the decision that vampires were created by the King of [censored].

The in-universe thought process is "it takes three days between contracting the disease and becoming a vampire, and the symptoms are fairly obvious, so you obviously wanted it if you let the transformation happen." Which isn't always accurate, but becoming a vampire lord revolves around a deliberate choice in any case.

Interesting, but haven't you just met her before the choice is made?

User avatar
benjamin corsini
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:32 pm

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 5:59 am

No. They're gross.
User avatar
Daniel Brown
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 11:21 am

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 1:17 am

Regarding the spoiler... isn't Serana accepted? Though you're right about black soul gems.

User avatar
OTTO
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 6:22 pm

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 5:20 am

Yes she is, but as a resource than ally, the Dawnguards don't have the best attitude towards her. Atlest to the very final speech between her and Isran, after that point, he becomes slightly more tolerant.

User avatar
Rhi Edwards
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:42 am

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 8:40 am

That's a problem with how Skyrim handles dialogue and player interaction, not with your character's own knowledge.

The problem with 'whatever happens to exist is natural' is that you could give that argument for all undead, which are definitely not natural. Going by Tamriel lore, vampires are pretty much in the unnatural category.

Also, with regard to curing vampirism; keep in mind Isran has no idea a black soul gem is involved. They certainly weren't in previous games; Morrowind's was about Molag Bal tasking you with slaying a rebellious daughter of his while in Oblivion you had to gather several ingredients, including 5 grand soul gems and the ashes of a powerful vampire.

User avatar
Jeremy Kenney
 
Posts: 3293
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:36 pm

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 6:09 am

But a Lion is a Lion, and a Gazelle is a Gazelle.

And the question here is not "is it morally justifiable that Lions hunt Gazelles?", it is "is it morally justifiable that a Gazelle wants to become a Lion and feast on it's own kind?"

So you have to ask the question from the perspective of a human, that wants to become a vampire, and is fully aware of the fact that this results in him seeing other humans only as prey.

So my answer would be: No, it is not morally justifiable.

User avatar
Liii BLATES
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:41 am

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 2:24 am

And if he did know? What would he do?

So this is common knowledge?

Not only as prey, that seems to be a personal choice. Also, no humans have to actually die.

User avatar
Sammi Jones
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 7:59 am

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 3:40 am

Bottom line is evil rules.

User avatar
Charlotte Henderson
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:37 pm

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 3:32 am

1) It's only known by Falion. Anything else is conjecture.

2) That vampires were created by Molag Bal? Depends on whether you've read that book about him; but given that even if you've read the book you still end up asking how vampires were created, well...

But the fact that vampires are bad news is pretty much commonplace. Given that you've probably seen several vampire attacks and that many vampire lairs look like a slaughterhouse, it's hard to see why you'd want to be one. By that point, your only interaction with vampires is as feral monsters.

User avatar
Phillip Hamilton
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:07 pm

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 5:33 am

Not quite. Serana is very nice, and there's also Solitude's court mage.

User avatar
D LOpez
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:30 pm

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 1:46 am

No, they are filthy beings that feed on the innocent and ruin lives. Only the heartless join clan Volkihar, only the heartless become vampires. Join the Dawnguard and wipe the land clean of this disgusting plight.

User avatar
bimsy
 
Posts: 3541
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:04 pm

Post » Fri May 24, 2013 7:20 pm

It's certainly not out of the realm of possibility though it would require quite a bit of RP and imagining new dialogue. In terms of a good Vampire it's entirely possible, though rare.

You don't have to RP a vampire as a bloodthirsty abomination, there are innumerable shades of grey that you can approach Vampirism with; my two vampires for example, both Purebloods but very different motivations and personalities Rose was forced into the ritual and never actively sought out vampirism but now uses it to her advantage to take out the more sadistic and malicious of her kind. Isabell on the other hand chose to go through the ritual as a way to give her the power to overcome her own fear, she's been a Vampire a long time and as a result of her childhood never had much of a respect for life in the first place, she's not bloodthirsty but as far as she sees it mortals are food nothing more nothing less.

Bottom line is RP how you want it, more than likely it's perfectly plausible

User avatar
Shae Munro
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:32 am

Post » Sat May 25, 2013 5:57 am

Serana is also the only one who is relatively altruistic. As for Sybil, unless you're practicing Detect Life in the Blue Palace it's unlikely you'll even realize it.

Two out of a sample size of hundreds isn't a very heartening picture.

User avatar
lacy lake
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:13 am

Next

Return to V - Skyrim