I guess independence would be the one that's closer... I'm still not so convinced, does that mean I become like some sort of leader my self? From what I understood from Benny he seemed to just want power, not at all help the people of the mojave organize themselves without any exterior - or interior - force telling them what to do. The best example of worker self management in the game is of course westside which looks like some sort of commune.

I'm not so sure on House either, I guess he's better than both Legion and NCR - although many members on the NCR can very well believe they're doing the best to help people. House's probably one of them money worshipers but whatever... In the end I guess I'll have to go with the minor evil.

The Followers look pretty damn anarchist (they do not seem to have hierarchies/leader) but obviously you cannot side with them... it wouldn't make sense too with their pacifist views, 'Followers fighting to control vegas' Haha..!

No. From what I gathered, the LW leaves Vegas to handle itself. At least, that's what the ending seemed like. So, Independent would be the anarchist solution.

House isn't a money worshipper, he's just very success of humanity focused. He's a good way to go in general, but an anarchist no. House rules Vegas as an independent nation focused on technological and economic progress. But the Yes-Man path is toppling everyone and NO ONE ruling Vegas. Sounds great in theory, horrible in practice. But Yes-Man is the path for an Anarchist.

The secret ending in dead money. Do the ending and instead of reloading, just retire said person with that ending as his/her ending.