I suppose that's the real question: Where does redemption stop? Who is more deserving of redemption?
Some say that it's never too late to be redeemed. Others say that once you go down that dark road, you can't come back.
Perhaps my Enclave anology was wrong. Autumn isn't a flying monster who's very nature is to burn everything. If he redeemed himself, it's just another story of a bad guy gone good. While he'd still have to pay for what he's done, there's no worry that he'll flip out and burn the world with his voice.
I'd be of the former, redemption is good for inner peace and all but not everything can be fixed by time and good deeds. If he was capable once before, what's to prevent it happening again? I just can't let him live, regardless of what guilt he may feel, or actions he's done to redeem himself. Who's he to put a value on lives lost and say that he's a good man? I guess by that token you could say what right does anyone else have to judge him, but it's basic law right? Paarthurnax killed a lot of presumably innocent people and the ancient Nord's certainly felt that freeing themselves from the Dragon's was necessary. When you can live forever like Paarthurnax - or just for a really long time who knows - just saying it was all in the past doesn't cut any butter with me, and with the Nord's reveration of their ancestors I can't imagine it would do to them either.
But seriously though, what do Dragon's
do on a day-to-day basis?
Still, would the Brotherhood even allow him to help? It wouldn't surprise me if they thought he had done too much damage and instead throw him in prison, maybe letting him out under guard if they reeeally needed him to do something.
Interesting debate...
Indeed, Autumn is never far from any discussion I and the other lore-intensive Enclave fans have. I personally dislike him and his goal intensely, but - not liking Eden all that much either - see his reasoning for it (even if that reasoning ending up being more personal).