Well i dident even mention flying cities o-o and i think flying cities are over kill.

that is possible as all the destruction with the civil war going but i highly doubt it

actually i had no idea that there was a bioshock floating city or whatever i was just bored and thought this would be something fun to discuss you know? i'm not making like serious suggestions or anyhting

oh crap, how do you delete posts? i just realized the last one had no ties to the topic anymore

yeah the whole floating city in the pacific is considered top of the line science, so i doubt that after the earth is flooded THATS when they are able to make cities in the sky

yah no... air cities are out. It just makes no sense.

Underwater city is a) to much like bioshock and B) to much fantasy fiction. (the Ark doesn't look enclosed to me, so ppl would suddenly need to be able to breathe underwater :unsure2:


Could be a second Ark

Could be some old mountain peak turned island that is found, but still to small to support everyone.....

However.... SMART would kinda svck outside of any urban type of environment... "YAY! Let me hurdle this overgrown protruding tree root" :rolleyes:


so perhaps the floods retreat and we go back to the old cities that had been flooded, so debris is all over the place, construction is started anew, and the fighting is over whos in control of the new civilization.

well mountains that high won't have many trees, just too cold to support forests. And land would be crowded with refugees as well. Large amounts of people + trees - resources = start your chainsaws. Maybe some kind of large sprawling shanty town settlement? And parkour is practiced quite often in forests, though from a story perspective, why would they fight in a forest(unless there is a base/outpost/spring there)?

Smart answer
The story can take place anywhere, dont let that limit your thinking. if the devs want it theyll make it.

This. There could be areas that are relatively intact, there could be shattered and twisted areas which would really exercise SMART and there could be shantytowns and whatnot where the inhabitants of the ark have settled. I think the main problem though is finding a motivation for the two factions to continue fighting after they've made landfall and thus have a lot more space and possibly more resources to work with.

If there is to be a sequel, it'll probably be more action packed than its predecessor. After all, more likely than not the shaky relations between both factions have been completely destroyed by this point, with the boiling over resulting in the entire Ark being torn apart by civil war.
Also, if they don't add them in the campaign of the first game, an outside party making contact with either faction of the Ark, the development of a WMD that could obliterate part of the Ark, or the creation of a new crisis (the arrival of pirates, the navy of a hostile country, or a mysterious nuclear submarine aiming to literally tear the bottom of the Ark a new hole, perhaps?) that forces the factions to work together to ensure their safety are all good plot devices.

If they're thinking about making a sequel they're thinking about it right now,while they're still getting paid for the first, and when their game goes live, if it succeeds they proceed to full production of the next game in their list, either sequel or something else, seeing as brink would have sated our thirst for that game type it would depend on success levels, and demand they could shift focus to producing DLC for the initial release to a sequel, or use DLC to help pay for development of a new game.

Its why you see good game fail they switched focus to the next game before fixing the last game.

Um... They aren't even sure of when they are going to release the first game, and you are ALREADY begging for a sequel? Dude, wait the 4 months or so the rest of us are patiently waiting, and FINISH the game before wanting more.

Yes I do think this should wait until we actual have Brink but I do have a decent idea for a Brink sequel or DLC.

There are supposedly people who hunted for the Ark and never found it. These people grouped together and formed a nation of sorts and with every nation you need an army (except Switzerland, joking of course :laugh: ). This nation waited and watched from a far off distance and waited for a chance to strike the Ark and found no greater time then when both of the "Armies" of the Ark were in no shape to fight. What these Warlords wanted from the Ark, the limitless tech it offered for this struggling "nation."

After the Ark's Civil War they are faced with an even greater enemy. With neither group able to fight back to defend their home the Resistance and Security must set aside the differences and march forward and face a new enemy who has invaded their "borders."

I don't know technically this would add two new teams and a new campaign.

But yes the talk of a sequel needs to wait. I just put this up because this is what I think about as I wait for Brink to come out and I thought I'd share it with the community.

Here's a question, if there's a sequel why must it be on the arc? Why must it even be apart of the same storyline? It appears the storyline in Brink can come to a good close and have a couple different endings depending on what side you are, but I don't think it'll really need another game to carry it on. Why not create a new universe but still keep the same concepts, gameplay, and artstyle as Brink? You could even still call it Brink 2, but with a completely new setting and story.

If they made a sequel in the same exact setting it'd be kinda lame, no?

I'd say a sequel would be some type of island/unknown land. As in, The Ark would crash into unknown land and they'd settle there.

maybe a sequal storyline: while on the ark, the resistance and security forces are fighting over equal resources, after a few years the water levels start dropping. and the people (both resistance and secu) are attacked by the hand full of survivors that have gone totally crazy and want revenge on those who left them to die when the world turned into a **hole.

where at first the, secu and resistance use these "newcomers" as tools for their own "goals"on the ark. finding that after a while. when their numbers are great enough. they turn on both resistance and the security forces. and the ark becomes a 1v1v1 freefight. with now 3camps

maybe some secu/resistance teamwork / backstabbing along the way?



i personally would like to see some kind of 3rd person shooter/ GOW style. but then with the parkour-ish gameflow.

^^^^

I was just thinking while playing Team Fortress the other day how a multiplayer with three different camps would play out (I was envisioning Red v. Blue v. Green for that). It'd be interesting but incredibly complex for developers to work it out, since they'd have to make sure each team had equal animosity with the other two teams, to make sure two don't ally against a third.

It's nothing but a wet dream, of course. It would never work. sad face

SPACE

The moon!!!!!


Sorry couldn't help myself.