Fudge sake some people it's [censored] in so many ways.

I think this question on here has been answered...

Then it would be a $70.00 dlc that would that like 2 or 3 years to make, and we still wouldn t know the canon ending more than likely, so it would be a waste of fo game. GAME OVER

Yeah can a mod close this aid of a forum.

While it has been stated that it (BS DLC) will not be done it can still be discussed.
The pro's, the con's, the speculation, the suggestions.
All of which can be discussed.
No reason to close it down just cause it's currently confirmed to not be made.

Isnt it kinda pointless to talk about it since its not gonna happen and it just annoys people. Not to mention theres already like 30 of these same threads out....

This.This thread is gagging to be closed.

All these posts show that people want to know what happened after the game.

I like the 100s and 100s of people that have made thae same thread. Gives Betheda a better feel of what most fans want.

All these posts tell Betheda something. Something they already knew, but this makes it even more clear.

1. Depends on how you look at it, I think it's pointless too but if some people wish to discuss why it's doable and why it's not or how it could be done then it does serve a point.
2. As long as it doesn't produce any flames, flamebaits or too heated debates it doesn't really matter.
3. Which are all dead.

Most fans probably don't want this or at least the true fans. :fallout:

Yah but they dont relize it takes a long time to make something that there asking for.

Obsidian made their fo that way. Bethesda did not, and from what Ive read from fo3 lead dev I gathered that Betheda will make it easy to have a continuation. To me that means no 35 endings, and I get to know what happened.

Ok sure.

How is being able to see what you accomplished (with the addition of some extra content) bad? Tell me, if this type of DLC were to be released, hypothetically, would you not buy it??? Why don't you actually justify your argument with something, instead of being an [censored]. Also, I know they're not going to do it, and I understand their reasons for not being able to do it. But if they had set out to do this from the beginning, and create an actual broken Steel type DLC (modified to fit NV, of course), I'm sure they would have been successful. in doing this, I'm sure they would both make money and please the many "casual" fans. What you older fans don't understand is that the majority of the fans came from Fallout 3, and many of those fans enjoyed Broken Steel. Broken Steel (along with Point Lookout) was the most critically acclaimed Fallout 3 DLC. Obviously, Obsidian doesn't seem interested in catering to the Bethesda fans, as they want to preserve the spirit of their previous creation. It's a bit surprising, but that's their decision. However, that doesn't mean we aren't allowed to debate whether or not it is a good decision, from a financial standpoint as well. After all, a forum is meant for discussing.

They burnt your universal assumptions into nothing worse than the great war burned the planet in a wasteland.

Fallout 3 sold far more than all the previous Fallouts combined. obviously, this means that many of the people who bought fallout 3 were new to the series and possibly more accustomed to the Bethesda/TES style of making games. That, combined with the critical success of Broken Steel, proves my point that the majority of the fans want something like this. Like you, I would have wished for broken Steel to have been handled better, but I'm happy with what we got. The people on this forum are the more dedicated fans of the series (the majority being those who played the older games), but you would be very wrong to assume that they represent the entire Fallout fanbase's opinion. Anyway, i'm done with this debate. Thank you and have a nice day.

Don't fix what isn't broken.

OH so now Im not a true fan because I don t want 10 and 13 year old holes in the fallout story lol.

The number of people that just jump on here and ask about an "is the game going to continue" greatly outweight the people that r on this site all the time.

Most of the people that r on this site all the time have an agenda (myself included). The 100s of threads made by posters you don t normally see on here do not have an agenda. This tells me that the actual number of all fo fans probably want to know the ending.

Don t ever tell me I m not a real fo fan because I don t agree with not knowing the end of the story. Or that I don t like the fact that there r 10 and 13 year old holes in the overall fo story so some people can [censored] speculate for a decade.

Maybe I m more of a fan than you because I want the whole fo story.

Ever think of that?

Couldn't have said it better myself.

allso the open ending in fallout started long before FO3 it started in FO2 that strangelly enougth are now (most part of them anyway) working on FO:NV :shifty:

What about F1 also.

i can't remmember last time i played FO1 i was still a tennager

Fallout 1 ends, and Fallout 2 dont have nothing to do after the Main quest, at least that you didnt end other side-quest, just some easter egg but nothing more to do



Some fans of Fallout 3 didnt wanted to continue after the main quest too, so thats not true

i tougth so FO1 ended FO2 you could move arround still get radom encounters

Fallout 1 ends

Fallout 2 dont ends and you can finish what you didnt before the main quest and some easter eggs, but nothing changes, Arroyo is still destroyed, and the NCR never got anexed or got under Military State, etc