Buld time on vaults and bunkers?

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 6:37 am

How long time did it take to build em do you think?
At lest for the main level, then of course they cud expand it for ever tho....

just the idea on when they had to start dig the hole to be ready to run 2077.
another idea was that they put the robots to work on build the vault /bunker and they have kept work on it the last 2-300 years...
User avatar
Mark Churchman
 
Posts: 3363
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:58 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 5:10 pm

We know how long it took, Vault's took avergage of five/six years I think, all were under construction by 2070 I believe.
User avatar
Maddy Paul
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 4:41 am

OK i have bean locking around but have only found when the vault was done but haven't found when they start build it ...
And i guess that got more routine on building so it must have gone a lot faster whit the last ones...

"Most vaults were completed by 2063, except for Vault 13 and Vault 112. Vault 112 was the last Vault to be completed, in June of 2074."

a yes the vault-tec vaults ordered by the government was done in time but the world did not stop build underground shelter/bunkers and so on....
User avatar
Solina971
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:40 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 5:24 am

They could have built more Vaults than we know of.

Vault-Tec is a corporation, they could thus have fullfilled their contract with the government and built more vaults, say for other powerful entities, politicians, other corporations(like Poseidon), themselves, etc.

Like hmm, if I am the CEO of Vault-Tec, I am gonna have my own vault.
User avatar
gemma king
 
Posts: 3523
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:11 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 1:23 pm

They could have built more Vaults than we know of.

Vault-Tec is a corporation, they could thus have fullfilled their contract with the government and built more vaults, say for other powerful entities, politicians, other corporations(like Poseidon), themselves, etc.

Like hmm, if I am the CEO of Vault-Tec, I am gonna have my own vault.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think it was established that there are indeed, other vaults that we do not know of. Like you said, for politicians, members of the government and CEOs and other rich, "important" people.
User avatar
Poetic Vice
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:19 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 5:03 am

Correct me if I'm wrong but I think it was established that there are indeed, other vaults that we do not know of. Like you said, for politicians, members of the government and CEOs and other rich, "important" people.

Well it makes sense. Corporations kinda like making money.
User avatar
Kevin Jay
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:29 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 4:08 pm

Well we can assume that House contracted Vault-Tec to build his Securitron Vault right? Vault-Tec just have a reputation as the premier builders of secure, underground facilities with incredible longevity.
User avatar
Ysabelle
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:58 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 3:32 am

Well it makes sense. Corporations kinda like making money.
But I don't think it would be a "vault". But I agree they probably built other shelters, but not like the vaults we see.
User avatar
Solina971
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:40 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 1:12 am

But I don't think it would be a "vault". But I agree they probably built other shelters, but not like the vaults we see.
I'd have to agree with you here. Calling it a "vault" assumes that you're putting away something for safekeeping (ergo the Vault Programs to continue humanity), not something so you can go in, survive, and come out. That would just be a massive waste of money, resourses, and time that could have been spent safeguarding humanty's future.
User avatar
Mark Hepworth
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:51 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 4:15 pm

But I don't think it would be a "vault". But I agree they probably built other shelters, but not like the vaults we see.

If Vault-Tec made them, it doesn't matter what they are called. The design would be extremely similar.

If built for a corporation, it may have more areas for research than a standard vault, and likewise if built for a politician, there probably wouldn't be any research space and the living area downsized as well. No need for a 500-1000 person living quarters if it is built for a politician and his 50 friends and family.

But some things, like the water system, hydro gardens, etc would probably be standard. They may even throw in a few complimentary blank vault suits and pip boys, as their way of saying thanks for the business.
User avatar
Jack Moves
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 1:34 pm

I'd have to agree with you here. Calling it a "vault" assumes that you're putting away something for safekeeping (ergo the Vault Programs to continue humanity), not something so you can go in, survive, and come out. That would just be a massive waste of money, resourses, and time that could have been spent safeguarding humanty's future.

I don't follow. What would be the point of a corporation or rich folk to contract Vault Tec to build them a shelter, that wasn't something you can go in, survive, and come out?

Isn't that why people build shelters? So in case of nuclear war they can do just that, survive?
User avatar
Andres Lechuga
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:47 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 5:10 am

I don't follow. What would be the point of a corporation or rich folk to contract Vault Tec to build them a shelter, that wasn't something you can go in, survive, and come out?

Isn't that why people build shelters? So in case of nuclear war they can do just that, survive?
Why would they want to come out? They are no longer rich. Apparently Vault Tec can build vaults that can last for many decades.
User avatar
Lily Evans
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 11:10 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 2:35 pm

If Vault-Tec made them, it doesn't matter what they are called. The design would be extremely similar.

If built for a corporation, it may have more areas for research than a standard vault, and likewise if built for a politician, there probably wouldn't be any research space and the living area downsized as well. No need for a 500-1000 person living quarters if it is built for a politician and his 50 friends and family.

But some things, like the water system, hydro gardens, etc would probably be standard. They may even throw in a few complimentary blank vault suits and pip boys, as their way of saying thanks for the business.
The vault has the iconic giant metal door. Large atrium where an overseer office watches over it. They have large living quarters. And they have some large reactor room. Then each individual vault has something special about it. Most of that would be cut or reduced if a family or small group of people contracted Vault-Tec to build a shelter. That is what I meant.

I'd imagine they have a basic shelter, like those in the 50's. Maybe then a couple rooms, then an entire complex, and finally a vault.
User avatar
Gwen
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:34 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 6:02 am

Why would they want to come out? They are no longer rich. Apparently Vault Tec can build vaults that can last for many decades.

Because you are alive. Sitting in a vault the rest of your life, would be like a voluntary prison sentence.

So, it depends on who the "vault" is for. If for a corporation, and they have scientists, they would maybe come out to rebuild. A politician, may want to come out and rebuild and rule. Just because they emerged from their shelter, doesn't mean they can't keep using it, like Vault City.

Anyway, can be a lot of reasons a group would emerge, depending on who was there, their goals, etc.
User avatar
Brian LeHury
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 6:54 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 4:16 am

I add the vault in the Sierra Madre to the list.
User avatar
Evaa
 
Posts: 3502
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:11 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 2:26 pm

If built for a corporation, it may have more areas for research than a standard vault, and likewise if built for a politician, there probably wouldn't be any research space and the living area downsized as well. No need for a 500-1000 person living quarters if it is built for a politician and his 50 friends and family.


it depens on how long you plan to stay ther! you need a good nr of person′s to avoide Inbreeding,
dont mix them up whit the one man boxes you fin all ower teh game...

I don't follow. What would be the point of a corporation or rich folk to contract Vault Tec to build them a shelter, that wasn't something you can go in, survive, and come out?

Isn't that why people build shelters? So in case of nuclear war they can do just that, survive?

Well ppl are building sutch things to day alredy so yes ... ppl will burn ther $$$ on it.
User avatar
Jose ordaz
 
Posts: 3552
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:14 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 4:13 pm



it depens on how long you plan to stay ther! you need a good nr of person′s to avoide Inbreeding,
dont mix them up whit the one man boxes you fin all ower teh game...



Well ppl are building sutch things to day alredy so yes ... ppl will burn ther $$$ on it.

I'm not disagreeing.

As far as inbreeding, it depends on how long you want to stay secluded in the vault. After 10 years you would be able to venture outside to find/meet other survivors.
User avatar
Trent Theriot
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 3:37 am


Return to Fallout Series Discussion