5 California students sent home for wearing Red/White/Blue

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:27 am

It's pretty obvious the kids were trying to cause trouble. Just a coincidence that they just so happened to wear clothes with American Flag motifs on them, on the day of Cinco De Mayo? Really?
I hope people aren't that daft or socially inept to realize what was going on.
User avatar
sara OMAR
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:18 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:13 am

Don't worry, it's mutual. I mean really, marmite? Marmite?! :D
How dare you, marmite is a way of life over here :P
A watered down weeny mans version of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegemite, a real condiment, for men named Bruce.

Puts hair on yer teeth :toughninja:


hey, lookit here, a topic. Lets climb on
At the same time if these kids were being disruptive than it was right for the administration to get involved.
buddy, you know, and I know, that when some US kids are wearing the US flag to a US school when there happens to be a non-US, non-religious (its a military holiday for petes sake!) holiday going on becomes in any way disruptive, then we have bigger problems that we can't go into here.


There are potentially larger issues that this is tapping in to, perhaps intentionally but I'd guess not, but they can't be delved in to without involving politics.
as you know.
User avatar
Queen Bitch
 
Posts: 3312
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 2:43 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:14 am

Thanks, I dont see the problem, St Georges day in the UK if im wearing red/green/white i dont care, neither dose anyone else. Ok its a weird combo but point it, is I wont put much thought into dressing in those colours, so it would be a coincedence. If they did it on purpose its bad, if not then its an accident thats easy to forgive.

Things that are "offensive" are always like that. Flies over one person's head, then lands square in the next person's eye. Put simply, Cinco de Mayo is a country-specific holiday, and showing up to the celebration deliberately dressed in the colors of a different country can easily be seen as being a jerk. Considering their rather unusual combination of clothing worn to school (i.e., swim trunks) it seems likely that this was indeed their intent, so negative reactions aren't surprising. If someone is doing something solely to annoy other people, they're being a jerk, regardless of whether you're actually offended by their actions. We don't have all the details from the article, as always, but if that's the case I'm not surprised the school did something.

As for sending them home, well...I'm not particularly distraught by that, but maybe I'm used to the fact that on the scale of negative reactions to someone looking different, that's barely on the radar. Having been shot at for it before, I'm not easily moved by any complaints of this being too harsh.

At the thread in general: Imagine if someone were throwing a superbowl party at their house for a certain team and someone showed up wearing a jersey for the other team just to mess with them. They'd be lucky to get out alive.
User avatar
Jack Moves
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:39 am

A watered down weeny mans version of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegemite, a real condiment, for men named Bruce.

This means war :swear:

Anyway, I think it's fairly likely the kids were trying to be provocative. As someone else said, it's not like they'd wear american flag shorts on any other day.
User avatar
Jarrett Willis
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:01 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:57 am


At the thread in general: Imagine if someone were throwing a superbowl party at their house for a certain team and someone showed up wearing a jersey for the other team just to mess with them. They'd be lucky to get out alive.

What?? I do that all the time! National Championships, Super Bowls, World Series'. I've got hats and such I don't want, but it's well worth it. Sometimes those parties need a little more action! :D

As far as the school nonsense goes....it seems typical these days. The kids probably wanted some attention, the school overreacts and makes things worse. Blah, blah.
User avatar
Mashystar
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:57 am

Yeah, in the US it's sort of the Mexican/Latin American equivalent to St. Patrick's Day. That is, it's more a cultural celebration and reason to party than anything else.

In parts of the US with large Hispanic (particularly Mexican) populations it can be a really big deal, just like St. Patrick's Day is generally wildly celebrated where there are large Irish populations. However at this point St. Patrick's Day is more of a universal thing whereas Cinco de Mayo remains more regional.



St. Patricks's Day is indeed a very big deal for some schools in the US - to the point children are harrassed for not wearing green on St. Patrick's Day, even in areas where the population is anything but predominantly Irish (happened in our area just recently). It makes me wonder if the uproar over those T-shirts is occurring for similar reasons, and is less about the T-shirts and more about the lack of conformity.

IMO, if the school district wants conformity in clothing, they should make uniforms mandatory, otherwise, they can hold their tongues.
User avatar
NIloufar Emporio
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:18 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:28 am

In parts of Britain, children are regularly beaten for wearing the wrong coloured top.

Since when?
User avatar
Ymani Hood
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:22 am

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:58 am

At the thread in general: Imagine if someone were throwing a superbowl party at their house for a certain team and someone showed up wearing a jersey for the other team just to mess with them. They'd be lucky to get out alive.

That's exactly my point. I guess the guy who wore the opposing teams jersey at a party for the other team to watch the superbowl, I'm sure that was just coincidence. No, the guy was trying to stir up trouble, and get a few laughs and/or metal doors in the face.
Just like these kids who wore american flag motifs/colored clothing. They didn't just do it by coincidence, don't be so daft.
Has this country really gotten so blinded by the phrase and idea of "freedom of speech" that we can't tell an obvious case of a few teens going against the grain to get laughs and offend people at the same time from something being "wrong"?
They got what they deserved.
User avatar
Lisa
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:57 am

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:14 pm

+1 Points to School.

Difficult situation, but honestly, it was clear that these students were doing this to cause trouble. You don't wear swim trunks because you woke up this morning and decided to wear swim trunks (unless you're going swimming). That isn't how it works. To me, I see five kids that used their clothes to make a political statement, and a High School is not the proper forum for such a statement, especially when there are students who could be intimidated by the statement. Furthermore, I think the district administration is gutless for not supporting the school administration. If you don't trust the calls they make on the ground, don't employ 'em.

Not wearing green is not a similar example. It is not a political message.
User avatar
Horse gal smithe
 
Posts: 3302
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:23 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:28 am

I want to see the ACLU get involved in this one.
It is an often unkown and unenforced US law that the flag not be worn as clothing, touch the ground, be displayed at night without illumination, fly in inclement weather, or be used as curtains. Patriotism is generally welcomed.
So did these boys break a law? Yes, an obscure one.
Did these boys meet the school dress code, aside from the bandana? Yes, although the flag and bandana broke flag respect laws. The bandana broke school law and was removed.
Were these boys trying to make a political statement, and expressing freedom of speech?
Yes they were.
Could it have been offensive to others of hispanic origin at the school?
Yes, considering the recent Arizona rulings.
Was the vice principal correct in sending them home?
No, they broke no school dress code law. Now, the government could prosecute them for breaking federal law, but there's a slim chance of getting a jury to convict them.
User avatar
Blaine
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 4:24 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:27 am

This is stupid. if the students wore it to send a racist message they'd deserve worse, but they didn't, so who the [censored] cares then? What's the problem?
User avatar
Josh Lozier
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:20 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:40 pm

St. Patricks's Day is indeed a very big deal for some schools in the US - to the point children are harrassed for not wearing green on St. Patrick's Day, even in areas where the population is anything but predominantly Irish (happened in our area just recently). It makes me wonder if the uproar over those T-shirts is occurring for similar reasons, and is less about the T-shirts and more about the lack of conformity.

IMO, if the school district wants conformity in clothing, they should make uniforms mandatory, otherwise, they can hold their tongues.

I'm a substitute teacher and last St. Patrick's Day I almost inadvertently went wearing an orange tie, talk about a fashion faux pas.

Of course these kids didn't inadvertently show up school in American flag clothing, I'd hope no one wakes up and inadvertently decides to wear swim trunks for the day - those things can chafe. :)

Those kids who were offended may have took this as a more disparaging symbol than I think it was intended, but it was still a silly thing for these boys to do (and a sillier way for the administration to react).
User avatar
luke trodden
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:48 am

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:36 am

This is stupid. if the students wore it to send a racist message they'd deserve worse, but they didn't, so who the [censored] cares then? What's the problem?

Look at it this way. It's pretty obvious they did this to cause trouble, rile up some people, and make a political statement. Wearing the American flag as clothing on a day for celebrating a Mexican holiday, a day where hispanic tradition and style is generally atmospheric where ever you go that celebrates the holiday. Please tell me how that is a coincidence. It's so glaringly obvious that only people who are blinded by "omg that wasn't fair!" can't see it.
And it was fair. If you're in high school, causing problems, and riling people up, even if you aren't "breaking" any rules technically, you can still get in trouble.
It's called instigating. And that's exactly what they were doing. So they were sent home, and rightly so.
User avatar
Ells
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:03 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:04 am

I want to see the ACLU get involved in this one.
It is an often unkown and unenforced US law that the flag not be worn as clothing, touch the ground, be displayed at night without illumination, fly in inclement weather, or be used as curtains. Patriotism is generally welcomed.
So did these boys break a law? Yes, an obscure one.
Did these boys meet the school dress code, aside from the bandana? Yes, although the flag and bandana broke flag respect laws. The bandana broke school law and was removed.
Were these boys trying to make a political statement, and expressing freedom of speech?
Yes they were.
Could it have been offensive to others of hispanic origin at the school?
Yes, considering the recent Arizona rulings.
Was the vice principal correct in sending them home?
No, they broke no school dress code law. Now, the government could prosecute them for breaking federal law, but there's a slim chance of getting a jury to convict them.

As a side note "The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem for display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning." But yes, everything Mamagato said here is spot on.
User avatar
Miss Hayley
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:31 am

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:33 am

There is something of a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconquista_(Mexico) or http://www.answers.com/topic/aztl-n-american-southwest type mindset in some members of the Mexican-American or Mexican immigrant community in the Southwestern US. A few people view the two Mexican holidays prevalent there (Cinco de Mayo and Mexican Independence Day) as a political statement particularly in the prominence of the Mexican flag. Hence the American flag reaction in some quarters. I lived in a city that is 70% Hispanic (Salinas CA - primarily Mexican) and while the Fourth of July celebration was canceled by the city due to budget problems the two massively celebrated Mexican holidays went off with plenty of community funding (and Mexican flags prominently displayed on house, cars, businesses).
User avatar
Project
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:51 pm

Also, here it is quite common for males to wear swim trunks as shorts, as long as they are at the knee, the local school board permits it. It's hot and humid nine months out of the year.


What I think the school has here is an opportunity to learn. Next year, to celebrate and encourage diversity, they could allow both US and Mexican colors, discuss history and culture, as well as the school cafeteria getting in the spirit by offering cuisines from both cultures.
User avatar
X(S.a.R.a.H)X
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:38 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:47 pm

Look at it this way. It's pretty obvious they did this to cause trouble, rile up some people, and make a political statement. Wearing the American flag as clothing on a day for celebrating a Mexican holiday, a day where hispanic tradition and style is generally atmospheric where ever you go that celebrates the holiday. Please tell me how that is a coincidence. It's so glaringly obvious that only people who are blinded by "omg that wasn't fair!" can't see it.
And it was fair. If you're in high school, causing problems, and riling people up, even if you aren't "breaking" any rules technically, you can still get in trouble.
It's called instigating. And that's exactly what they were doing. So they were sent home, and rightly so.

I agree, don't get me wrong, I understand why someone could see that as a big deal.

My point is, that getting upset over it is stupid. I understand why they do, but really what's the point? If someone were to wear an american flag in Norway on our national day, I wouldn't care at all. If said person came up to me and started spewing racist comments at me, then I'd care, but anything less than that, I just don't see the point.
User avatar
Elisha KIng
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:18 am

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:12 pm

I agree, don't get me wrong, I understand why someone could see that as a big deal.

My point is, that getting upset over it is stupid. I understand why they do, but really what's the point? If someone were to wear an american flag in Norway on our national day, I wouldn't care at all. If said person came up to me and started spewing racist comments at me, then I'd care, but anything less than that, I just don't see the point.

And I agree with you on that part of it too, I don't really care, at all, who wears what, no matter what day of the year it is.
But some people do. A lot of people do. Not me, or you, but enough that rules have to be enforced to keep the peace regarding certain peoples beliefs and feelings.
User avatar
Nick Pryce
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:32 pm

As a side note "The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem for display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning." But yes, everything Mamagato said here is spot on.

Yes, I knew that too.
My son's boy scout troop has ex military in them, every so often a collection of worn flags must be destroyed in a very solemn ceremony. I have witnessed it twice, and seen grown ex marines go misty eyed.
User avatar
Suzie Dalziel
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:56 am

Don't worry, it's mutual. I mean really, marmite? Marmite?! :DBut back on topic, I agree that if people found it provocative their best course of action would have been to ignore it. Unless this was part of some ongoing issue I'd also suggest that the people take a moment to consider why they find it provocative, and if they really should.At the same time if these kids were being disruptive than it was right for the administration to get involved. A better course of action would have been talking to people, both those taking offense and those causing the problems. I wasn't there so I don't know the real situation but from that news report it sounds like there wasn't an underlying issue here and this could have been resolved with a few discreet discussions rather than turning it in to a big deal. There are potentially larger issues that this is tapping in to, perhaps intentionally but I'd guess not, but they can't be delved in to without involving politics.

Yea The kids were most likely trying to cause trouble but the reaction was uncalled for like you said.Two wrongs don't make a right.

Also, here it is quite common for males to wear swim trunks as shorts,

It is actually.They are pretty darn comfortable and are better than regular shorts when its hot out.
User avatar
Tina Tupou
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:37 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:14 pm

It is actually.They are pretty darn comfortable and are better than regular shorts when its hot out.

And a very nice breeze is comforting :P
User avatar
Andrea P
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:45 am

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 7:14 am

Sounds a bit ridiculous since it's not Mexico. Even then I think it would be a total over reaction. Red, white and blue is the tricolore yes, but the US flag, the Union Jack, Australian and New Zealand flags are all the same colour. Big fuss over nothing. School being silly.
User avatar
Jordan Moreno
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 4:47 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:43 pm

Looking back, I could have accidentally done what they did. In High School, I regularly wore a red cap, jeans when it was cold or chili (like it was for a while yesterday for me), and some of my shirts are white. It could have also been a day where I didn't feel like wearing a black shirt again for the 100th time.
User avatar
Lavender Brown
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:37 am

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:14 am

Since when?

It was a joke about gang colours.
User avatar
Phillip Brunyee
 
Posts: 3510
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:43 pm

Post » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:50 am

Looking back, I could have accidentally done what they did. In High School, I regularly wore a red cap, jeans when it was cold or chili (like it was for a while yesterday for me), and some of my shirts are white.


Yeah but these ones had american motifs and stars on them. The boys were obviously stirring up trouble or wanted to be idiots, but its all rather passive. Unless they were singing bruce springsteen "born in the usa" at the other students then i would have taken serious action. Some people are likke that, complete idiots, i guess being english and growing up next to south end and the chavvy side of britain i evolved a natural resistance to idiots.
User avatar
Dan Endacott
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:12 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games