You don't have any views other than being a console loving crytek fanboy. You haven't formed a single legitimate argument since you started posting in this thread either. I will defend my thread from console idiots, and I have no problem doing so.

I love this thread. It's entertaining. So much arrogance, so many bad insults. But so what if it is a "console port?" If you're really that butthurt ignore the release, GTFO of the forums, and leave the rest of us who enjoy this "console port" in peace.

Unfortunately for the lot of us, however, the platform erection-waggling contest isn't conclusively decided yet. They have to "crusade valiantly" against the "evil" of Crytek.

The lean function has been automated and streamlined but I like how it responds when in cover. Graphics options should be made avaliable; that is the only gripe I have with the game, but I can't complain it runs smooth as silk on my native res on extreme setting with vsync on.

The lean function has been automated and streamlined but I like how it responds when in cover. Graphics options should be made avaliable; that is the only gripe I have with the game, but I can't complain it runs smooth as silk on my native res on extreme setting with vsync on.

Then you obviously don't have sli or crossfire.

Mind telling me all the components in your pc?

(waits for him to look it up a random computer on google)....

Very well.

Phenom II X4 3.4 Ghz
Gigabyte GTX 460 1 GB: 815/2000/1630 (Core, Memory, Shader)
6 GB DDR3
Corsair TX650

...

I'm calling them idiots, because they ARE idiots. They have been either brainwashed or are severely miss-informed. Or they are xbox kiddies trolling.
You have not replied me. I'm not asking if you are thinking that people that not think the same as you are idiots or not. What you think is not the problem, here.

What I am asking you: do you really expect that Crytek replies you when you are telling moron to other guys?

Really, seriously.


Who not? All I've done is defend PC since I made the thread. If I have to call console noobs idiots it should be no concern of theirs.

They don't have to answer this thread either. Just make a statement on the website would be enough. Because I really want to hear their reason.
No guy... You are insulting people, don't listen people that differs from you, and trolling. (to not respect other opinions is troll). You cannot be calling idiots to other guys and expect some respect, at the same time.

So really, if you are expecting something from Crytek, thanks to your post... I can tell you that this will not work. For real.

And I am very pissed with the game... but your way it is not the way. Calm a little, go out, return and read what are you replying. It is not the way.

Runs in a constant 75 fps which is the max refreshrate of my LCD in native 1280x1024 and never dips under 68 fps. Black Ops the biggest fail in PC gaming history went from a steady 75 to a crippling 35 fps in certain maps.

Very well.

Phenom II X4 3.4 Ghz
Gigagybe GTX 460 1 GB: 815/2000/1630 (Core, Memory, Shader)
6 GB DDR3
Corsair TX650

you don't have sli, therefor you wouldn't know about the 46 long page thread of people having problems running the game that need to apply user-fixes for the game to work correctly.

This game does not run perfectly. Also, motion blur is messed up with crossfire/sli as well.

Very well.

Phenom II X4 3.4 Ghz
Gigagybe GTX 460 1 GB: 815/2000/1630 (Core, Memory, Shader)
6 GB DDR3
Corsair TX650

you don't have sli, therefor you wouldn't know about the 46 long page thread of people having problems running the game that need to apply user-fixes for the game to work correctly.

This game does not run perfectly. Also, motion blur is messed up with crossfire/sli as well.

That is not directly Crytek's fault. nVidia/AMD need to optimize SLI/Xfire support for the game.

Very well.

Phenom II X4 3.4 Ghz
Gigagybe GTX 460 1 GB: 815/2000/1630 (Core, Memory, Shader)
6 GB DDR3
Corsair TX650

you don't have sli, therefor you wouldn't know about the 46 long page thread of people having problems running the game that need to apply user-fixes for the game to work correctly.

This game does not run perfectly. Also, motion blur is messed up with crossfire/sli as well.

That is not directly Crytek's fault. nVidia/AMD need to optimize SLI/Xfire support for the game.

um ****. What do you think this is?

ATI Catalyst Application Profiles 0.5 MB 11.2 CAP4 3/18/2011
Description:
This release of ATI Catalyst? delivers support for the latest ATI CrossFireX? profiles in a separate executable file ensuring users have access to the absolute latest set of profiles installed on their PC.

New profiles added to this release:
- Crysis 2 - Improves CrossFire performance
- Dungeons – Improves CrossFire performance with forced on Anti-Aliasing
- Crasher – Forced on Anti-Aliasing through the Catalyst Control Center has been disabled
- Shogun 2 (DX9 version) – Improves CrossFire performance
- America’s Army 3 - Improves CrossFire performance
- Flatout: Ultimate Carnage - Improves CrossFire performance

There's nothing wrong with the driver. Their console port is **** up because it currently doesn't support multi-gpu processing. You even have to enable it in the system file for the game. EPIC console port fail.

Dope. I smoke it.

Going to now. Waiting to see how this thread unfolds, lots of ignorant people in here. OP can be a bit ignorant too but his point is valid. This is a Port.

Dope. I smoke it.

Going to now. Waiting to see how this thread unfolds, lots of ignorant people in here. OP can be a bit ignorant too but his point is valid. This is a Port.

Ignorant in the sense that I keep calling people idiots care-fee? I would agree. Everything else I have said is valid though.

Console port?

Just think. Its a multi-platform game. Is that a port? Nope...

Console port?

Just think. Its a multi-platform game. Is that a port? Nope...

Dev's won. They can make people think Multi-Platformers aren't ported.

3 DIFFERENT GAMES WEREN'T DESIGNED. 1 WAS, AND THEN SPREAD TO ALL 3 PLATFORMS.

Get it?

It's a port.

I will take a look at the PS3 and 360 versions. And their respective texture sizes.

I wouldnt be surprised if they were the same, or the PC's textures are only slightly better.

Console port?

Just think. Its a multi-platform game. Is that a port? Nope...

it can be a multi-platform game and while still maintaining to be a PC game.

Dice is doing this with BF3, why couldn't crytek?

Yes, it is a multi-platform game. LOl obviously considering its on all platforms. That doesn't mean it was intended with console-limitations in mind though. We, the pc community, also got those console limitations in our game. For a reason which is unknown to me. That is why I made this thread, to ask crytek why they have done this. So yes, it is in fact a console port.

The game has been downgraded vastly compared to crysis 1 and warhead. Crysis 2 was made with console limitations in mind first and foremost. Those transitions made it into the PC version. All I can do at this point is ask crytek why this has happened.

So when the DX10 or DX11 patch is released it's not a port anymore.

Well the DX10 files where in the beta. The 64 bit files where in the leaked built. So i think it is just a matter of time to see some new features.

I will take a look at the PS3 and 360 versions. And their respective texture sizes.

I wouldnt be surprised if they were the same, or only slightly better.

I will take a look at the PS3 and 360 versions. And their respective texture sizes.

I wouldnt be surprised if they were the same, or only slightly better.



Adap fgt.

Got something to contribute? If all you could come up with for a handle was "iNullify", I doubt it.

Mis-worded my post, better now.

So when the DX10 or DX11 patch is released it's not a port anymore.

It's still a port even if the graphics become slightly better. There are still invisible walls everywhere and you can't change how linear this gameplay is. In crysis you were on a sandbox island you could go where you wanted to go. Console limitation. While it would definitely be an improvement in the right direction, it still wouldn't change the core of the game. Also, they are not going to be able to add in destructable environments with a patch.

Well the DX10 files where in the beta. The 64 bit files where in the leaked built. So i think it is just a matter of time to see some new features.

I hope you're right, But I honestly doubt it. I doubt they will make a dx11 patch.

I find it funny that the OP is going around calling everyone a moron or an idiot that doesn't know anything but his entire thread is based on HIM wanting to know why something is the way it is. Way to go, champ.

I find it funny that the OP is going around calling everyone a moron or an idiot that doesn't know anything but his entire thread is based on HIM wanting to know why something is the way it is. Way to go, champ.
I think everyone wants to know why crytek made the pc version into a console port. I don't speak for everyone, but saying only "I" would want that information is being ignorant.

Do you have that information? No. No one does but crytek. Think before posting next time.

This may answer some questions...or just piss people off...it kind of frustrates me and shows where Yerli got his reasoning for doing things with a console mindset.

http://www.nowgamer.com/features/637/crysis-2-cevat-yerli-qa?o=1#listing

This may answer some questions...or just piss people off...it kind of frustrates me and shows where Yerli got his reasoning for doing things with a console mindset.

http://www.nowgamer.com/features/637/crysis-2-cevat-yerli-qa?o=1#listing

It didn't even make sense to me, and it only pisses me off. lol.

I just want a no-bs answer. Like "yes it was easier", or "Because we wanted more money".

They make the console version first because of console limitations then just port it to PC version and I quote "because it can handle anything we do on a console". NO **** SHERLOCK!

We can also handle a multitude of functions that the console version cannot, but I guess that doesn't matter at all. I'm done with crytek, they can seriously **** off.

I will take a look at the PS3 and 360 versions. And their respective texture sizes.

I wouldnt be surprised if they were the same, or only slightly better.



Adap fgt.

Got something to contribute? If all you could come up with for a handle was "iNullify", I doubt it.

Mis-worded my post, better now.

nexxusty .............................................. really

Anyways on topic:

Yes i do have something to contribute , i agree crysis 2 could of been better if it had taken advantage of the engine it was built on, but then surly you risk alienating the console player base from the get go , not that i really care too much been a PC gamer.

But the game is still good regardless , so i don't see why the mass biching and demanding of superiority above all other gamers all the time. No wonder people think pc gamers are elitest morons, rather not be painted with the same brush.

Yes some things were dissapointing with the release like:

- DX11

- Destruable envrioments

- Secondry objectives ?

But its not the end of the world like some make out , the SP was awesome. MP a little dodgy atm though