Actually it's the other way around. Those are the recommended system specs.
Looks like you beat me to respond here. If those specs are for a recommended CPU, then why are they listed with what I presume are the minimum requirements for a video card? It just seems confusing....I find it hard to believe that the recommended video card to run this game would be a Radeon X1300 and a GeForce 6. Hope you catch my drift here?
I'm not trying to be a pest here, but just trying to make sense of things. If those are the recommended specs to run this game, then the specs for the video card are FAR FAR lower than the recommended cards to run Fallout 3. I would think New Vegas has a bit more oomph to hardware requirements, but I can't imagine it running all that well with a GeForce 6 or a Radeon X1300...not at recommended at least. Here are the requirements for FO3:
Minimum System Requirements:
?Windows XP/Vista
?1GB System RAM (XP)/ 2GB System RAM (Vista)
?2.4 Ghz Intel Pentium 4 or equivalent processor
?Direct X 9.0c compliant video card with 256MB RAM (NVIDIA 6800 or better/ATI X850 or better)
Recommended System Requirements:
?Intel Core 2 Duo processor
?2 GB System RAM
?Direct X 9.0c compliant video card with 512MB RAM (NVIDIA 8800 series, ATI 3800 series)
Recommended for FO3 was a Nvidia 8800 or Radeon 3800 series card, which is WAY better than a GeForce 6 or X1300 one....it doesn't make sense.