Can my pc run new vegas?

Post » Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:16 am

CCNA Edit I have decided to make this thread the Official one for figuring out if your PC will run the game.

To make this easy, if you can run Fallout 3, you can run New Vegas.

Here are the Reccomended Requirements. As you can see, the hardware needed is not bleeding edge, so most modern gaming PCs will have no issues running this game.

http://bethblog.com/index.php/2010/10/01/new-vegas-news-its-done-plus-pc-reqs-and-cake/

As usual, on board graphics (no seperate video card) will not run this game. If you have that, you will have to investigate adding a video card to your current system. There may be some integrated graphics solutions coming that can run modern games, but for now, they are not up to the rendering needed.

If you have any doubts, please post what you have here and we will make a educated guess based on what we know about how Fallout 3 runs. However, this educated guess will be pretty accurate.

All other Hardware Threads will be closed and directed to this one.

Here is the Link to the Hardware Requirements Lab that can help you determine if you can run the game. Thanks to Trekkie107 for providing this.

http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyri/



The original first post in this thread follows.



The only thing im concerned with is the video card, the pc hasnt come in yet and im not sure what its capable of, the video card is the ATI radeon HD 4550 1gb

i got a duel core 650 intel i5 2.66 ghz i think

and 4 gigs of ram,
1 tb harddrive

think that will do good? or do i need a better video card... im not really good at the whole videocard judging all i know is that its not a "gaming" video card
User avatar
Mark Hepworth
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:51 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:24 pm

Can you run FO3?
Then yes, you can.
User avatar
Eibe Novy
 
Posts: 3510
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:32 am

Post » Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:11 am

Can you run FO3?
Then yes, you can.


i didnt get the pc yet :(
User avatar
Carlos Vazquez
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:19 am

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:10 pm

*Nevermind*
User avatar
Jordan Fletcher
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:27 am

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:54 am

Can you run FO3?
Then yes, you can.


He/She said the PC hasn't come in yet.

@ OP: Those are oddly enough the same specs my comp has. I can run Fallout 3 with full graphics and mods with no problems so I'm sure New Vegas will run fine for us both. :)
User avatar
Lynne Hinton
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:24 am

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:58 pm

He/She said the PC hasn't come in yet.

@ OP: Those are oddly enough the same specs my comp has. I can run Fallout 3 with full graphics and mods with no problems so I'm sure New Vegas will run fine for us both. :)


well thats defiantly good to know... shall i pre order the pc version too :)
User avatar
T. tacks Rims
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:35 am

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:36 am

Judging from the official requirements, you are way above the specs necessary to play it.
User avatar
Big mike
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:38 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:21 pm

Judging from the official requirements, you are way above the specs necessary to play it.

Yeah i heard about it... ill go do a real quick vid card comparison... TOO GOOGLE
User avatar
glot
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:41 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:06 pm

found this http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/ati-radeon-hd4550_12.html

might need to over clock it
User avatar
Chloe Mayo
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:59 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:06 pm

Not really im actually trying to figure out if i should put another 70 dollars into newvegas because from what im seeing, playing on the pc is going to be where the party's at, well i guess it has always been.

Any way, why u hating

Ok well i found my solution :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbGVL2VJUEI hopes this helps any one else curious about a 4550 :)
User avatar
Nancy RIP
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:42 am

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:35 pm

Yesteday the F:NV system requirements we're revealed and I read: a dual-core 2.0GHz minimum. I'm worried this will become just like Mass Effect 2, optimized for dual-core and ONLY PLAYABLE on dual-core! I have a fast single-core and I really want to enjoy F:NV. BTW I can play Fallout 3 at max settings with little to no stuttering.
User avatar
Petr Jordy Zugar
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:10 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:05 pm

Does your CPU support hyperthreading? It's not a true 2nd core, but it allows the CPU to handle 2 threads at the same time. If you look in the task manager and you see two CPU graphs, or run dxdiag.exe and on the Processor line and see (2 CPUs) you might be OK. A single core CPU with hyperthreading will make the system thinks it has two CPUs to work with.
User avatar
A Boy called Marilyn
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 7:17 am

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:52 am

My question is does NV only run on dual-core (a question for the developers!)
User avatar
Melanie Steinberg
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:25 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:48 pm

My question is does NV only run on dual-core (a question for the developers!)

The requirements shouldnt be more then FO3, so if you ran FO3 fine, you should run this game fine. FO3 didnt take too much advantage with PCs with more then 1-2 cores anyway.
User avatar
Melanie
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 4:54 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:07 pm

*Facepalm*
Dual Core optimized means that it works as well as it did on single cores, but now gamers get more advantage from dual cores, because the game uses them more efficiently
EDIT:Also, if you seriously have only one core on your PC, then you REALLY should upgrade, as no games will run for you nowadays
User avatar
Kay O'Hara
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:04 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:24 pm

The game will not ONLY be playable on dual core, that would be ridiculous. It will be possible to play it on a single core if the speed is decent. The performance wont be up to scratch though.
User avatar
Bek Rideout
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:00 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:31 am

I have a really fast machine (for a single core) an ATI Radeon HD 3850, 2GB RAM and a 2GHz AMD Athlon 64 3000+ and i can run Fallout 3 with 20-30 fps. I can also play Crysis with 20 fps and Mass Effect 2 with 60 fps
User avatar
Kat Ives
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 2:11 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:23 am

its just like Windows Vista and 7 are optimized for multicore .
it just means that all the cores will be put to use efficiently instead of being just for show .
User avatar
Alycia Leann grace
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:07 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:34 pm

*Facepalm*
Dual Core optimized means that it works as well as it did on single cores, but now gamers get more advantage from dual cores, because the game uses them more efficiently
EDIT:Also, if you seriously have only one core on your PC, then you REALLY should upgrade, as no games will run for you nowadays

The OP is referring to the system requirements that were posted yesterday on the Bethesda Blog. It does say under requirements, Dual Core 2.0GHz. I don't see how NV would require a dual core, so that has to be a mistake. From what I've seen, it looks like they're using better textures than F3, but that would only push the GPU requirement up, not the CPU.
User avatar
Kelly John
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 6:40 am

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:16 pm

Ok well i found my solution :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbGVL2VJUEI hopes this helps any one else curious about a 4550 :)


Told you. It runs Fallout 3 just fine. :)
User avatar
Matt Bee
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:32 am

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:04 pm

Ok well i found my solution :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbGVL2VJUEI hopes this helps any one else curious about a 4550 :)


I don't buy that video.

1: He didn't show the settings.
2: It did stutter a little.
3: It was indoors only.

I'd would want, as the budget could allow, a GTS 250 1GB, GTS 450 1GB, HD5770 1GB or GTX 460 768MB/1GB.
User avatar
lillian luna
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:43 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:12 pm

The 4550 isn't actually an OMG Awesome card. The 512mb version is just below my sorta svcky card on http://www.overclock.net/graphics-cards-general/502403-graphics-card-ranking-5th-time-last.html list.


The good news is that my card (Radeon HD2600XT / 256mb. mobile. underclocked. It's an old iMac. /shrug) ran FO3 fine at mid-low settings at 1680x1050.

Yeah, you won't be turning everything on (I mean, come on.... that one test page linked had it running 4xAA, 16xAF?!? Of course it ran slowly), but it'll work, and the game'll still be pretty enough.
User avatar
Sheeva
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:46 am

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:54 pm

www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyri/
When you get the PC.
User avatar
Penny Courture
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:59 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:42 pm

Multi-threaded applications will run just fine on a single-core processor, though obviously you'll need a significantly faster single core than you would two cores.
A 2GHz Athalon 64 3000 isn't really particularly fast, either, so I'm not surprised you're running up against issues. It's not that the games were designed for only dual core (It doesn't work like that, your OS' resource management takes care off all of the messy low level details for you), it's that your processor simply isn't fast enough to keep up.
User avatar
Charlotte Henderson
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:37 pm

Post » Wed Sep 01, 2010 7:51 pm

With ATI, the x550 cards are at the lower end of gaming cards. It will run this game, but with some eye candy turned down and not at too high a resolution. However what I would do is get the game, play it for a while, then hit the parental units (or significant other) up for a video card for Christmas/Hanuka/Kwanzaa
User avatar
ijohnnny
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:15 am

Next

Return to Fallout: New Vegas