You can't really compare the Witcher to a TES game. The Witcher games aren't open-world RPGs - you're not meant to wander around and do a load of side-stuff. if you take the story out of the Witcher games, they become completely pointless because that's pretty much all they're about.
I have to ask though, why are you even on these forums if you don't like TES-style RPGs and prefer story-driven games like the Witcher?
Originally... Because Bethesda acquired the Fallout IP, I immediately bought the Oblivion CE (and was very impressed with the visuals, and in-engine mechanics that could be transferred to a Fallout sequel ~FO3).
*I became very disappointed at around June 6th 2008 when I realized that not just minor aspects would be transferred & re-purposed, but the entire game concept of Oblivion was to
be Fallout 3, using trappings of the IP as a window dressing.
I stayed because this is the FO home forum and NV was in development. :shrug:
I'd never heard of Skyrim, (as I'd never heard of Bethesda prior to seeing them listed as the next Fallout developer). With Skyrim I was hoping for more of a Daggerfall/Morrowind improvement over Oblivion ~for them to steer away from the simulator route; but that's not going to happen
.
Currently, my interest in Skyrim is the engine itself ~only the engine itself
; and the new Havok tools. It will be for modding experiments if I decide to buy it, (sometime next year, maybe).
Why are you saying the Skyrim story is going to be silly? All you know is the scenero of the story not whats in store for us, it could turn out to have the best story/main quest line in any TES game so stop assuming,
Did I? :shifty:
Oh, yea and Oblivions storyline was better than Fallout 3's imo :tongue:
I can agree with that.
Also... why is it so hard to spell Nerevarine correctly. It took me about five tries.
Look at the letters...
Then look at this...
http://www.learningbooks.net/wholeword.html
I dno't konw, it mghit hvee smoetihng to do wtih it. :shrug: