Chemistry Help Please

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:45 pm

I'm having a hard time understanding limiting reactant and excess reactant. I know what they means but like i don't get how to find it and stuff.
So an example problem:

4NH3 + 5O2 = 4NO + 6H2O
If a container were to have 10 molecules of O2 and 10 molecules of NH3 initially, how many total molecules (reactants plus products) would be present in the container after this reaction goes to completion?
User avatar
Len swann
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:02 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 9:21 am

I'm having a hard time understanding limiting reactant and excess reactant. I know what they means but like i don't get how to find it and stuff.
So an example problem:

4NH3 + 5O2 = 4NO + 6H2O
If a container were to have 10 molecules of O2 and 10 molecules of NH3 initially, how many total molecules (reactants plus products) would be present in the container after this reaction goes to completion?

Well, you know that O2 is the limiting reactant in this, because it requires more of it, but you have the same amount of it as NH3. When you've used 10 molecules of O2, you will have only used 8 molecules of NH3. For every 5 molecules of O2, you're going to get 10 total molecules of products (4+6), and since you used 10, there are 20 molecules of products, plus the 2 leftover molecules of NH3.
User avatar
Cassie Boyle
 
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 9:33 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 pm

Well, you know that O2 is the limiting reactant in this, because it requires more of it, but you have the same amount of it as NH3. When you've used 10 molecules of O2, you will have only used 8 molecules of NH3. For every 5 molecules of O2, you're going to get 10 total molecules of products (4+6), and since you used 10, there are 20 molecules of products, plus the 2 leftover molecules of NH3.

I still don't understand, why is O2 the limiting reactant?
User avatar
Nuno Castro
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:40 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:50 am

I still don't understand, why is O2 the limiting reactant?


Because it is used up first. Hence, it limits the reaction.
User avatar
Manuel rivera
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:12 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:01 pm

I still don't understand, why is O2 the limiting reactant?

Because for every 5 O2 molecules that are used, only 4 NH3 molecules are used, so the O2 will be used up first, since you start with equal amounts of both.
User avatar
mollypop
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:47 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:02 am

Easiest way to do it is to compare the ideal molar ratio with the actual one. The ideal molar ratio for this reaction would be 5/4 or 1.25 (coefficient of oxygen divided by the coefficient of ammonia). The actual ratio you get there is 1 (remember n = N/Na, thus n(O2)/n(NH3) = N(O2)/N(NH3) = 1). Since the actual ratio is less than the ideal one means you either need more oxygen or less ammonia i.e. oxygen's the limiting reactant. All oxygen molecules will thusly be used, leaving 2 ammonia molecules along with 8 nitrous monoxide and 12 water molecules.
User avatar
Sophie Payne
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:49 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 9:20 am

I'm sorry for asking too much, but can you guys show step by step in a way that's simple.
User avatar
CArlos BArrera
 
Posts: 3470
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:26 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:26 am

You have 10 O2 and 10 NH3. To gain one set of product, you use 5 O2 and 4 NH3. You are now left with 5O2 and 6 NH3. When you run it again, you are left with no more O2 and 2 NH3. Because O2 is used up before NH3, it is the limiting reagent.

It's basic arithmetic.

Now figure out how much products there are. Remember, you had to run this twice.

Or hell, think of the problem as this

You have 10 A and 10 B. When you use 5A and 4B, you make 4X and 6Y. Will you use up A or B faster? How much of A or B will you have left? How much X and Y will you have after you use as much A and B as you can?

I assume this is high school chemistry, right?
User avatar
Joe Bonney
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:00 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 9:06 am

You have 10 O2 and 10 NH3. To gain one set of product, you use 5 O2 and 4 NH3. You are now left with 5O2 and 6 NH3. When you run it again, you are left with no more O2 and 2 NH3. Because O2 is used up before NH3, it is the limiting reagent.

It's basic arithmetic.

Now figure out how much products there are. Remember, you had to run this twice.

Thank you, i get it now but im not sure about the products
Also, can you use this method for every problem because in my book, it shows that you need to do all these equations and stuff.

I assume this is high school chemistry, right?

Yes it is
User avatar
Kayleigh Mcneil
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:32 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:52 am

reread what I wrote. It takes 5A and 4B to make 4X and 6Y
You have initially 10A, 10B, 0X and 0Y. All you need to do is find out how much A, B, X, and Y you have when you use up as much A and B.

A = O2
B = NH3
X = NO
Y = H2O
User avatar
OJY
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 3:11 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:50 am

reread what I wrote. It takes 5A and 4B to make 4X and 6Y
You have initially 10A, 10B, 0X and 0Y. All you need to do is find out how much A, B, X, and Y you have when you use up as much A and B.

A = O2
B = NH3
X = NO
Y = H2O


Correct me if im wrong
So i used 10 molecules of O2 which is 2 times. So i multiply 4 from NO by 2 and 6 from H2O by 2, then 8 and 12?
So then 2A+8X+12Y = 22 molecules total?
User avatar
michael danso
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 7:30 pm

yes.
User avatar
darnell waddington
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:43 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:20 am

Thank you
User avatar
Angelina Mayo
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:58 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:30 pm

Another question. How come your not supposed to use gram quantities to determine the limiting reactant, but mole instead?
User avatar
Louise Lowe
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:08 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:28 am

Another question. How come your not supposed to use gram quantities to determine the limiting reactant, but mole instead?

Because you first need to convert the grams to moles. The ratios in the equation are by moles, not mass, so you can't use the ratios with mass. 5 grams of O2 isn't the same number of moles as 5 grams of NH3, so you first have to convert it.
User avatar
Lauren Graves
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:03 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:42 am

Another question. How come your not supposed to use gram quantities to determine the limiting reactant, but mole instead?

Because grams don't explicitly say how many molecules of the thing there are whereas moles do and what determines what's the limiting reactant is the number of molecules.
User avatar
Vickytoria Vasquez
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:06 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:43 am

gram is just weight, and each element has a different weight. Using moles uses a system of accounting of how many molecules there are, molarity for the concentration.
User avatar
Siidney
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:54 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:17 am

gram is just weight, and each element has a different weight. Using moles uses a system of accounting of how many molecules there are, molarity for the concentration.


Pretty much this ^

Grams is weight and there can be any number of molecules within that item. However using the mole denotation allows for a more precise measurement with a reaction. Still don't understand moles myself and took 1 course of chemistry at my Community College. As Hellmouth said though using moles allows for more precise calculation of a chemical reaction.

You'll love it OP when you start getting into Molarity rate reaction with temperature between 2 and possibly 3 different chemical compounds.
User avatar
Mr. Allen
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 8:36 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:55 am

Thank you guys for your help!
and also, what if you're given a balanced equation and are asked to find out the limited reactant, but they don't give you the grams of any of the reactant to convert it to mole to find which is limited or excess. So for instance, lets say:
4Fe + 3O2 = 2FE2O3
what should i do?
User avatar
Kate Norris
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:12 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:44 pm

In this kind of problem, assume there is 10 moles of reagent for the both of them. Meaning, you assume you have 10 moles of Fe and 10 moles of O2. NOW SOLVE IT!
User avatar
Jesus Duran
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 12:16 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:54 am

In this kind of problem, assume there is 10 moles of reagent for the both of them. Meaning, you assume you have 10 moles of Fe and 10 moles of O2. NOW SOLVE IT!

So Fe is limited and O is excess cause i start off with 10 moles in both reactant and keep subtracting them to the corresponding coefficient till one runs out?
User avatar
Caroline flitcroft
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:05 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:33 am

This is correct, Fe is the limiting reagent. Also, 10 moles of O2 mean there will be 20 moles of O. With each reaction, you need 4 things of Fe and 6 things of O. By the second run, you'll run out of Fe (or at least you won't be able to run a third), while there is more than enough O2 to continue running.
User avatar
Adrian Morales
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:19 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 7:30 pm

I have another question. Let's say you have Pb(OH)2 and you're trying to find the molar mass. Do you distribute the 2 and get PbO2H2 or just PbOH2?
User avatar
Soph
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:24 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:54 am

PbO2H2.

When you have something in brackets followed by a subscript number it means multiply everything within the brackets by the number.
User avatar
Julia Schwalbe
 
Posts: 3557
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:02 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:54 am

Actually, gram is a measurement of mass. Force equals mass times acceleration; Newtons = Grams * Meters per Second. Semantics. :P

I remember chemical equations... A bunch of confusing short-hand because scientists don't have time to waste writing everything out. Plus, the Post-It collage is more impressive as a crucible of esoteric epiphanies than if it were just parts of a whole canvas for a single thought.
User avatar
Luis Reyma
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 11:10 am

Next

Return to Othor Games