Yes and no what about changing midway ? To complement with another class skill your character.
If radiant only give you missions related to warrior mage and thief, then what of hybrids ?
And how will they, i hope they have tought of that, stop a mage for example that keep casting the same spell time and again meaningfullessly just to speed up.Well i shouldn t care you say, but thosekind of people are the one that cry and then end destroying entire systems that where balanced over all the aspects of the system.
The assembling of this 2 pieces are more restrictive than the begin one way and build what you want attributes/skills based gameplay, or at least it what it seems.

Assembling the pieces is more important than looking at only 1 aspect.
So far we got few information but many ??? are surging due to how the combinations seems to lack proper integration.

I hope we can atleast name our class when we create our character, i know it seems a small thing but i like having a defined class/trade.

Yes and no what about changing midway ? To complement with another class skill your character.
If radiant only give you missions related to warrior mage and thief, then what of hybrids ?
And how will they, i hope they have tought of that, stop a mage for example that keep casting the same spell time and again meaningfullessly just to speed up.Well i shouldn t care you say, but thosekind of people are the one that cry and then end destroying entire systems that where balanced over all the aspects of the system.
The assembling of this 2 pieces are more restrictive than the begin one way and build what you want attributes/skills based gameplay, or at least it what it seems.

Assembling the pieces is more important than looking at only 1 aspect.
So far we got few information but many ??? are surging due to how the combinations seems to lack proper integration.

It's not simplifying -- it's streamlining . They're making it more sensible, more intuitive, more good!

Finally they're getting rid of the restrictive system where what you can aspire to is predetermined from the start because of some imperial paperwork you filled out or some BS you told a guy you just met in a dungeon after being ambushed by a group of hooded zealots.

It's not simplifying -- it's streamlining . They're making it more sensible, more intuitive, more good!

Finally they're getting rid of the restrictive system where what you can aspire to is predetermined from the start because of some imperial paperwork you filled out or some BS you told a guy you just met in a dungeon after being ambushed by a group of hooded zealots.

You could make a character sheet and print it out for handy reference? Or write a book? There's no one saying you can't -- why would you need to have it in the game? I can understand the want, but I don't see the need.

It's not simplifying -- it's streamlining . They're making it more sensible, more intuitive, more good!

Finally they're getting rid of the restrictive system where what you can aspire to is predetermined from the start because of some imperial paperwork you filled out or some BS you told a guy you just met in a dungeon after being ambushed by a group of hooded zealots.

Plus, i like is how other characters have defined classes/trades, if they have them it would be nice if we did too, with proper references to said class made in-game where appropriate.

Those are gone too.

I beleive this TES will do that more than other onesThanks to dynamic quests/radiant ai-quests and stuff mentioned in GI how a mage will duel you.

It still all sounds iffy to me. I could see how not having a class could help, it's just that it seems that the more they keep simplifying (This IS a simplification.) aspects of the game the less it seems like Elder Scrolls to me.

It's not simplification if your getting rid of useless or lackluster skills and repurposing them somewhere else in the game, it's just streamlining the game. The same thing was for Morrowind to Oblivion. All the things they removed were either easily exploitable skills or spells and skills that were repurposed in the game in some other way. A smaller number of something doesn't mean the game was simplified, it's just not bloated with things that are unneeded in their current incarnation.

remember they are not putting anything in they are cutting things out

WTF is an "exploitable skill"? , it is a single player none can tell me what i can exploit and what i can not.

If you can understand the want why are you even asking? I never said i need it in-game i said i'd like it in-game.
Plus, i like is how other characters have defined classes/trades, if they have them it would be nice if we did too, with proper references to said class made in-game where appropriate.

all characters start the same.

they are not putting anything in

, i don't believe why people believe all this [censored] about how removing content makes a better game.
WTF is an "exploitable skill"? , it is a single player none can tell me what i can exploit and what i can not.
A smaller number of skills = cut the costs and make the game even more stupid , because Beth's target audience cannot into classes and attributes , they can not even find a [censored] cube .

Like if your mage falls from grace to become a thief you aren't punished by the skill system.

Actually even in Oblivion (and maybe Morrowind I'm not sure) the game totally ignores your selected class. Instead they make comments based on your actual skill sets. You could make a pure magician class in Oblivion and if you leveled up melee skills/athletics/acrobatics/whatever gives this particular message the NPCs would make comments about your muscles looking strong. So there is precedent for NPCs recognizing your skills, but there's also precedent for the class being nothing more than a label only ever seen by the player.