Clothing Handled Like Armor : V - Skyrim

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 10:43 am

Another stupid as hell decision.

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:42 pm

So, as I don't think we will get gloves or belts back ... that's 3 slots ('outfit', shoes, hood) when we decide not to wear armor?

Great thing this game doesn't get dumbed down! :celebration:

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:16 pm

It's ok, everything will be alright. Everyone will find something they like and removing the mix and match will allow for the devs to make dozens upon dozens of unique clothing outfits and armor suits with several variations of each without having to worry about the separate pieces working together. It gives them more artistic freedom than they had before.

Have you seen some of the suits? They look 10x better than anything that has ever been in TES. It won't be as bad as you think, I promise.

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:32 pm

I personally would rather have more npc's on screen instead the option to mix and match my clothing.

And besides, I remember a few raiders who's didn't have much of a top to speak of even though their armor was one piece. Just start looking for that begger who's to poor to afford a shirt.

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:27 pm

Yay, more over reacting.

It's not a big deal.

Really.

It isn't. :spotted owl:

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 12:23 pm

I can't wait to see the usual suspects bend over backwards to defend this decision. I'm REALLY looking forward to reading those posts.

EDIT: And here's the first one :biggrin: :

Yay, more over reacting.

It's not a big deal.

Really.

It isn't. :spotted owl:

Yeah none of it's a big deal bro. We're all just CRAZY for wanting silly things like customization and multiple pieces of clothing.

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:28 pm

You don't wear clothes, so get out. I welcome marriage cause it's a new feature. As a person who enjoys cloths I'm worried.

So.... in your opinion, we should be "freaking out" about something that adds options to the game, but accepting something that takes options away from the game?If nothing else - congratulations on being a part of Beth's target market. Would that more of us were that lucky.....

Relationships don't belong in this series.

» Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:52 am

I liked the merged clothes from OB better than the seperate pieces anyway.

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:00 pm

Why do you all hate this? It's not such a bad thing. Sure, it's not that good, but where were all of you guys when romance was confirmed? Where were all of you guys when children were confirmed? You guys should be freaking out about that, not this.

whats so bad about children?
or do you mean actually HAVING children, like with your spouse?
i havent heard anything bad about children in-game

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:58 pm

Why do you all hate this? It's not such a bad thing. Sure, it's not that good, but where were all of you guys when romance was confirmed? Where were all of you guys when children were confirmed? You guys should be freaking out about that, not this.

What's wrong with romance and children?

You're just cynical. Horribly cynical. :sadvaultboy:

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 10:05 pm

Why do you all hate this? It's not such a bad thing. Sure, it's not that good, but where were all of you guys when romance was confirmed? Where were all of you guys when children were confirmed? You guys should be freaking out about that, not this.

I like the idea of romance, and the children additions. So there's nothing to freak out about in that regard. This, however, svcks. I dun likes mah clothing/armor options to be uncustomizable. But...I suppose as long as there are more options in designs than there were in Oblivion, then fine. If I can have a shirtless outfit with belt straps (criss-crossing the torso) for housing small weapons, and nice leathery pants as a full outfit by default, then whatever. If I have to wait for mods to separate/add these kinds of things..then boo.

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:09 pm

whats so bad about children?or do you mean actually HAVING children, like with your spouse?i havent heard anything bad about children in-game

What's wrong with romance and children?You're just cynical. Horribly cynical. :sadvaultboy:

I just think it's a mistake to include this in the game. They're taking away from other content. Maybe, if children and relationships weren't added, clothing wouldn't be combined. Ever thought of that? Blame relationships and children for clothing being combined.

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:11 pm

Now does this mean that we won't be able to wear clothing under our armor?

» Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:46 am

I just think it's a mistake to include this in the game. They're taking away from other content. Maybe, if children or relationships wasn't possible, clothing wouldn't be combined. Ever thought of that? Blame relationships and children for clothing being combined.

This doesn't even make sense

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:45 pm

Relationships don't belong in this series.

Erm, okay. You say that in a matter of fact way.
It's your opinion, but if Bethesda creates the series, and they put it into the series, it clearly belong in this series.

But y'know, to each their own.

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:29 pm

This doesn't even make sense

If Bethesda had more time, they could have possibly separated clothing. Relationships and children took time to make. Do you get it now?

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:49 pm

People do REALLY like to bring up subjects not related to the topic at hand around here, don't they?

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:19 pm

If Bethesda had more time, they could have possibly separated clothing. Relationships and children took time to make. Do you get it now?

:facepalm:

» Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:39 am

I just think it's a mistake to include this in the game. They're taking away from other content. Maybe, if children and relationships weren't added, clothing wouldn't be combined. Ever thought of that? Blame relationships and children for clothing being combined.

If I had to choose (if it was really really impossible to have both), I'd choose children and marriages over separate pants and shirts. We are talking about a new gameplay mechanic versus a largely cosmetic consideration. Sure you could put different enchantments on pants and shirts before, but there are other ways to compensate.

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 4:56 pm

Aw [censored] hopefully it's not fully merged. :banghead: Damn this svcks. :swear:

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:55 pm

Todd, how would you like it if I broke into your closet and sewed all your pants to your shirts?

C'mon man, this is just ridiculous. I was loving everything about the game, but this is a big downer for me. Most of my fun comes from personalizing my characters and making them unique. Guess I can't do that anymore...

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 10:38 pm

Now does this mean that we won't be able to wear clothing under our armor?

More than likely.

Naked under our robes aswell...

» Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:30 am

If Bethesda had more time, they could have possibly separated clothing. Relationships and children took time to make. Do you get it now?

Clothing was separate to begin with, champ. Bethesda actually took time and effort to change the system.

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:28 pm

If Bethesda had more time, they could have possibly separated clothing. Relationships and children took time to make. Do you get it now?

I personally think Beth knew that they weren't going to seperate clothing by the time relationships and children were implimented.

» Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:17 pm

well... now all i got to do is kill myself