consoles and DirectX

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:37 pm

im wondering how they would feel if their precious xbox gets game that only use dx7 and dx9 would be patched in like 1-2 months.. how would they feel spending 60$/€ on a game in that shape :)

and now they all are complaining about us pc gamers being spoiled brats and pc elisits..

example:
some guy i know got crysis 2 and was like "wow this is an amazing looking game" and stuff, and im like " hell no this game is **** " and he is like flaming at me "just because u've got expensive hardware doesnt make it justified that you get better games than us console gamers".

and i kinda punched him in the face but thats not my point :p
User avatar
Kaley X
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 5:46 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:27 am

im wondering how they would feel if their precious xbox gets game that only use dx7 and dx9 would be patched in like 1-2 months.. how would they feel spending 60$/€ on a game in that shape :)

and now they all are complaining about us pc gamers being spoiled brats and pc elisits..

example:
some guy i know got crysis 2 and was like "wow this is an amazing looking game" and stuff, and im like " hell no this game is **** " and he is like flaming at me "just because u've got expensive hardware doesnt make it justified that you get better games than us console gamers".

and i kinda punched him in the face but thats not my point :p

We have better hardware we should have better looking games. Dev's try to fudge the issue with BS but it's pretty simple and PC games are also cheaper to make.

What I suggest we do as customers (those of us with DX11 at least) is discriminate ruthlessly against games which don't support DX11 or just look like console ports and then all jump on games like Shogun 2. That will send developers a very clear message. But if there is no DX11 on release (like with Shogun 2) maybe next time everybody should wait and then buy the game the day the patch comes out because we need to make this VERY clear.

User avatar
RAww DInsaww
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 5:47 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:45 am

Just start pointing out consolers to the BF3 trailers (beeing rendered on the PC btw) and tell them we're getting and they're not because consoles are ****. Then watch them rage in the DICE forums as to why we're getting a lot more than them. Good times.
User avatar
Nicole Kraus
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:49 am

Just start pointing out consolers to the BF3 trailers (beeing rendered on the PC btw) and tell them we're getting and they're not because consoles are ****. Then watch them rage in the DICE forums as to why we're getting a lot more than them. Good times.

Yeah until DICE cut back the PC version because of it. I can't believe these nasty little idiots who complain about us getting something extra. We aren't getting extra from devs we are getting less. Because if devs put the same effort into PC games as console games they would look many times better. As a result of our hardware that we paid for.

Even with BF3 more effort will probably go into the console version.
User avatar
Dalton Greynolds
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:12 pm

Post » Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:38 pm


We have better hardware we should have better looking games. Dev's try to fudge the issue with BS but it's pretty simple and PC games are also cheaper to make.

What I suggest we do as customers (those of us with DX11 at least) is discriminate ruthlessly against games which don't support DX11 or just look like console ports and then all jump on games like Shogun 2. That will send developers a very clear message. But if there is no DX11 on release (like with Shogun 2) maybe next time everybody should wait and then buy the game the day the patch comes out because we need to make this VERY clear.
at least Creative assembly mentioned why they removed dx11 and said patch will be ready in 3-5 weeks..

edit: wrong word choise :p
User avatar
Siidney
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:54 pm

Post » Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:50 pm

here's an example for you: if i was to buy the Nvidia's 580 when it came out, it was £408 now that's just the GPU for a gaming PC. So basically for that ammount of money you could have bought 2 xbox'es. OBVIOUSLY YOU WANT MORE FOR YOUR MONEY if you are a PC gamer and hardware enthusiast! And i do think developers should take their time to make the games on PC look better - infact much better - than the inferior console versions.

FYI i'm using the Radeon 6870 which i must say isnt too bad :D
User avatar
Brian Newman
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:36 pm

Post » Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:45 pm

Just start pointing out consolers to the BF3 trailers (beeing rendered on the PC btw) and tell them we're getting and they're not because consoles are ****. Then watch them rage in the DICE forums as to why we're getting a lot more than them. Good times.

Yeah until DICE cut back the PC version because of it. I can't believe these nasty little idiots who complain about us getting something extra. We aren't getting extra from devs we are getting less. Because if devs put the same effort into PC games as console games they would look many times better. As a result of our hardware that we paid for.

Even with BF3 more effort will probably go into the console version.
why cut back because of the consoles? they said that they will first make the game on the pc and cut it back FOR the consoles.. and that means that will get stuff like Massive Destruction, Tesselation, Parallax Occlusion Mappings, fully dynamic shadows on every object, More Draw Calls than the gtx580 can handle, the best Antianolysing we've seen yet and As They said " Alot more Textures than a 1GB Vram can handle :):):):) ". and all of these features will either get removed ( like tesselation ) and/or reduced to an ammount that the consoles are able to handle it :p.. Dice has never really let the pc comunity down. BC wasnt really great but it was still alot better on the pc than on the consoles
User avatar
Travis
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:57 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:02 am

here's an example for you: if i was to buy the Nvidia's 580 when it came out, it was £408 now that's just the GPU for a gaming PC. So basically for that ammount of money you could have bought 2 xbox'es. OBVIOUSLY YOU WANT MORE FOR YOUR MONEY if you are a PC gamer and hardware enthusiast! And i do think developers should take their time to make the games on PC look better - infact much better - than the inferior console versions.

FYI i'm using the Radeon 6870 which i must say isnt too bad :D
DERP

No one MAKES you buy hardware
User avatar
Rozlyn Robinson
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 1:25 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:58 am

yes but the game developers for PC should take it into account that MOST of the PC crowd is more "hardcoe" than the console community, especially when we're talking about Crysis crowd which has on average a higher end machine compared to other communites such as COD let's say
User avatar
Isabel Ruiz
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 4:39 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:12 am

here's an example for you: if i was to buy the Nvidia's 580 when it came out, it was £408 now that's just the GPU for a gaming PC. So basically for that ammount of money you could have bought 2 xbox'es. OBVIOUSLY YOU WANT MORE FOR YOUR MONEY if you are a PC gamer and hardware enthusiast! And i do think developers should take their time to make the games on PC look better - infact much better - than the inferior console versions.

FYI i'm using the Radeon 6870 which i must say isnt too bad :D

this is what bothers me.. most of the developers dont care about pc gaming anymore. its not because of the pirates which any sane person would know that its just a little loss (since most of the pirates arent gonna pay for every single game they see.) but because the fact that there are alot of people with 360/ps3.. every little kid/teenager has a console nowadays while only people with an above avarage IQ are able to build a good gaming pc. ( or upgrade w/e )..

the facts are just clear 28mil copies of the 360 have been sold. 23mil ps3's and im just guessing here but i guess there arent even 10mil people who own a decent gaming pc.. and xbox games have higher prices.. are and dont need dedicated servers and stuff like that.. so in their eyes they will have like 2-3 times more profit while focus on console games and they'll eventually port it to pc for a bit more profit.

problem of the gaming industry is that money is more important than your customers being happy..
( ofc not every developer/publisher is like that. ie bethesda, gearbox, valve, dice, creative assembly and some others )

tl;dr : EA, Ubisoft and activision can go eat their own shorts..
User avatar
Kari Depp
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:19 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:05 am

THEMADKITTEH is right, i think that sometimes the dev is pressurised by the publisher into porting ETC as they want the profit ASAP. i hope this dosent happen to BF3 :!!!!
User avatar
Darrell Fawcett
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:16 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:13 pm

3 times more money is spend on Gaming PC components (what goes inside the case) than on all Consoles combined, including all there accesssories, per including the average price of a 40"/1 meter LCD Full HD TV Per Console Sold.

On top of that Microsoft has anounced that there new upcoming Windows Platform will be aimed more at gamers and developers + theres a rumour theres no more microsoft console coming anymore also, and instead microsoft is betting really high on Windows "8"
User avatar
Jade
 
Posts: 3520
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:42 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:56 am

THEMADKITTEH is right, i think that sometimes the dev is pressurised by the publisher into porting ETC as they want the profit ASAP. i hope this dosent happen to BF3 :!!!!

That will happen for sure with BF3, because its EA's way of doing busnis it seems, even things that are free still cost you money :p

I hope the new S.T.A.L.K.E.R. wil still be PC exclusive just like the 3 others before it where... that game would really svck as a port :(
User avatar
herrade
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:09 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:53 am


On top of that Microsoft has anounced that there new upcoming Windows Platform will be aimed more at gamers and developers + theres a rumour theres no more microsoft console coming anymore also, and instead microsoft is betting really high on Windows "8"

LOL don't bet on microsoft to have a clue what we want... THey're trying to cash in on the Farmville and Bejeweled and Facebook crowd.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBPYdgy35KA
User avatar
gandalf
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:57 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:23 am

here's an example for you: if i was to buy the Nvidia's 580 when it came out, it was £408 now that's just the GPU for a gaming PC. So basically for that ammount of money you could have bought 2 xbox'es. OBVIOUSLY YOU WANT MORE FOR YOUR MONEY if you are a PC gamer and hardware enthusiast! And i do think developers should take their time to make the games on PC look better - infact much better - than the inferior console versions.

FYI i'm using the Radeon 6870 which i must say isnt too bad :D
DERP

No one MAKES you buy hardwareNo one make us buy the game, too. But someone do this and expect that the game does what they told us it will do.

So if they told us that the game had awesome graphics, that Crysis 1 graphics will be nothing compared with them, that pc graphics will be in another level, that we will have Dx11, etc... We expect this to be true.

We does not improve hardware only to improve hardware. We improve hardware to use software. So if we decide to change our graphic card or computer cause some game or something we desire... it is understable that we became dissapointed when we discover that most of the things they said... are lies.
User avatar
FABIAN RUIZ
 
Posts: 3495
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:13 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:03 am

im wondering how they would feel if their precious xbox gets game that only use dx7 and dx9 would be patched in like 1-2 months.. how would they feel spending 60$/€ on a game in that shape :)

and now they all are complaining about us pc gamers being spoiled brats and pc elisits..

example:
some guy i know got crysis 2 and was like "wow this is an amazing looking game" and stuff, and im like " hell no this game is **** " and he is like flaming at me "just because u've got expensive hardware doesnt make it justified that you get better games than us console gamers".

and i kinda punched him in the face but thats not my point :p

Well for one their would be no way to find out if a game is running DX 7 instead of DX 9. Secondly they would not care once the game looks good. Third the incesent whining by PC gamers is nothing short of pathetically childish. Its one thing to be disappointed with the lack of DX11 there is another to be crying fanatically especially if the game looks good. After so many claims of PC gamers being "better" and more mature than console gamers they react in this manner, behaving quite the opposite.
User avatar
Shirley BEltran
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:14 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:54 am


On top of that Microsoft has anounced that there new upcoming Windows Platform will be aimed more at gamers and developers + theres a rumour theres no more microsoft console coming anymore also, and instead microsoft is betting really high on Windows "8"

LOL don't bet on microsoft to have a clue what we want... THey're trying to cash in on the Farmville and Bejeweled and Facebook crowd.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBPYdgy35KA
ye microsoft is the biggest douche bag in the gaming industry..why are there so many 360 exclusives? because microsoft doesnt care about the pc comunity.. and @ the other guy.. i bet once the 360 slim 250GB's hit 150$/€ microsoft will announce another console coming.. the money that macrosoft makes from the consoles and xbox live its soo immense that there is no way that microsoft will abondon consoles.. microsoft and sony are just like Nvidia and AMD.. aslong as one makes a product the otherone wants to try to compete with it. thats the whole point of the gaming industry unfortunatly

edit :spelling

User avatar
roxanna matoorah
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 6:01 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:53 am


Well for one their would be no way to find out if a game is running DX 7 instead of DX 9. Secondly they would not care once the game looks good. Third the incesent whining by PC gamers is nothing short of pathetically childish. Its one thing to be disappointed with the lack of DX11 there is another to be crying fanatically especially if the game looks good. After so many claims of PC gamers being "better" and more mature than console gamers they react in this manner, behaving quite the opposite.
implying that crysis 2 looks and play well on the pc.. in that case you either havent played the first one and have no clue what a true pc game should look/play at this point or are just simply trolling..

and we are not really whining about it, and this isnt a "i want dx11" topic this is directly towards the console comunity that say pc games shouldnt look better than the console versions and "cry" about that kind of stuff.. really dude your ignorance amuses me.
User avatar
Robert Bindley
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 5:31 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:19 am

here's an example for you: if i was to buy the Nvidia's 580 when it came out, it was £408 now that's just the GPU for a gaming PC. So basically for that ammount of money you could have bought 2 xbox'es. OBVIOUSLY YOU WANT MORE FOR YOUR MONEY if you are a PC gamer and hardware enthusiast! And i do think developers should take their time to make the games on PC look better - infact much better - than the inferior console versions.

FYI i'm using the Radeon 6870 which i must say isnt too bad :D
DERP

No one MAKES you buy hardwareNo one make us buy the game, too. But someone do this and expect that the game does what they told us it will do.

So if they told us that the game had awesome graphics, that Crysis 1 graphics will be nothing compared with them, that pc graphics will be in another level, that we will have Dx11, etc... We expect this to be true.

We does not improve hardware only to improve hardware. We improve hardware to use software. So if we decide to change our graphic card or computer cause some game or something we desire... it is understable that we became dissapointed when we discover that most of the things they said... are lies.
well i didnt upgrade my gear because i was waiting for recommended specs and they still havent annouced them.. but i completely understand your point and know how you feel bro
User avatar
louise fortin
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:51 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:52 am

implying that crysis 2 looks and play well on the pc.. in that case you either havent played the first one and have no clue what a true pc game should look/play at this point or are just simply trolling..

and we are not really whining about it, and this isnt a "i want dx11" topic this is directly towards the console comunity that say pc games shouldnt look better than the console versions and "cry" about that kind of stuff.. really dude your ignorance amuses me.

Its funny that you are telling me how well Crysis 2 is running on my computer(I have played Crysis and it is installed on my comp). Now thats interesting. And its also funny that you are telling me that I am not a true PC gamer. Really who wants to be a true PC gamer. What does that give me? Does it make you and the others feel better about yourself by "claiming" you are a "true" PC gamer? Are you all even reading what you all a writing? And this incorrect use of "troll" is even more baffling, in which anyone who disagrees is a troll. Geeesh god forbid the an alternative perspective or a difference of opinion or someone pointing out the painful and consistent whining ;)

It seems to me that "PC gamers"(not all) have been blowing up every forum about the great injustice of not having DX 11 and the horrifying consolization. Whats more amusing is how these people act as if the announcement of the Xbox and PS versions as if it was a last minute surprise. If you look at the amount whining that is occurring on the PC forums I can clearly understand the perspective of Xbox or PS gamers. But I guess I am noob, console baby, troll etc. Ah well.
User avatar
Tanya Parra
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:15 am

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:30 am


Its funny that you are telling me how well Crysis 2 is running on my computer(I have played Crysis and it is installed on my comp). Now thats interesting. And its also funny that you are telling me that I am not a true PC gamer. Really who wants to be a true PC gamer. What does that give me? Does it make you and the others feel better about yourself by "claiming" you are a "true" PC gamer? Are you all even reading what you all a writing? And this incorrect use of "troll" is even more baffling, in which anyone who disagrees is a troll. Geeesh god forbid the an alternative perspective or a difference of opinion or someone pointing out the painful and consistent whining ;)

It seems to me that "PC gamers"(not all) have been blowing up every forum about the great injustice of not having DX 11 and the horrifying consolization. Whats more amusing is how these people act as if the announcement of the Xbox and PS versions as if it was a last minute surprise. If you look at the amount whining that is occurring on the PC forums I can clearly understand the perspective of Xbox or PS gamers. But I guess I am noob, console baby, troll etc. Ah well.

"the incesent whining by PC gamers is nothing short of pathetically childish. Its one thing to be disappointed with the lack of DX11 there is another to be crying fanatically especially if the game looks good"

Please enlighten me, good sir. What those your above quote means. im 18 years old, i've played games like duke nukem 3D, Doom 1 & 2, starcraft, warcraft, tomb rider, Quake, unreal tournoments, Deus ex, etc. and i have witnessed the evolution of gameplay and graphics as a 4 yeard old kid, teenager and now as an advlt..

From the very first pc games to around 2005-2006 the graphics and gameplay improvements were rather a revolution. since the arrive of the xbox 360, the gaming evolution has been slowed down to the pace of a walking turtle. And except for some pc exclusive and some developers like Dice, the pc comunity has been given **** console ports with minor graphical improvements and copy pasta gameplay. Conclusion : the people that ask for dx11 arent just saying that games should have dx11 just for the sake of dx11; But they are rather disappointed that the current gaming industry barely cares about improvement and uniqueness and instead focusses on the marketing and the best ways to reduce production costs and increase their paychecks. And the way i see it, every pc gamer has the right to complain about games like crysis 2 that are being dumbed down because of the consoles and profits.

And until Crytek annouces an official statement that says
"We are sorry that we false advertised this game for being superiour on the pc compared to the consoles and that it will include dx11. So in the upcoming patch ( With a release date ) we'll Support Anti-Cheating Software, Real Dedicated Servers, Fixing Bugs, Improving Gameplay, Adding PC only features ( Prone, Lean, etc. ), Proper implemented DX11 with all the features it allows us, Decent full HD textures and proper hardware support", every single complaint, rant, whine and whatsoever is Completely Justified and Rightous.

And if you disagree with me, which not only will it show your ignorance, but i can sincerely tell you that you can go and F*CK your self.

and i hope you read this and understand my point

have a nice day
User avatar
Kortknee Bell
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:05 pm

Post » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:11 am

implying that crysis 2 looks and play well on the pc.. in that case you either havent played the first one and have no clue what a true pc game should look/play at this point or are just simply trolling..

and we are not really whining about it, and this isnt a "i want dx11" topic this is directly towards the console comunity that say pc games shouldnt look better than the console versions and "cry" about that kind of stuff.. really dude your ignorance amuses me.

Its funny that you are telling me how well Crysis 2 is running on my computer(I have played Crysis and it is installed on my comp). Now thats interesting. And its also funny that you are telling me that I am not a true PC gamer. Really who wants to be a true PC gamer. What does that give me? Does it make you and the others feel better about yourself by "claiming" you are a "true" PC gamer? Are you all even reading what you all a writing? And this incorrect use of "troll" is even more baffling, in which anyone who disagrees is a troll. Geeesh god forbid the an alternative perspective or a difference of opinion or someone pointing out the painful and consistent whining ;)

It seems to me that "PC gamers"(not all) have been blowing up every forum about the great injustice of not having DX 11 and the horrifying consolization. Whats more amusing is how these people act as if the announcement of the Xbox and PS versions as if it was a last minute surprise. If you look at the amount whining that is occurring on the PC forums I can clearly understand the perspective of Xbox or PS gamers. But I guess I am noob, console baby, troll etc. Ah well.


I fail to understand how expressing our anger at the blatant lies put forth about this game is whining. We were told it would be better than the original, was going to be a PC game first and would have DX 11. I am not just talking about DX 11. I am talking about this game being an obvious port over to PC using the xbox as the model.
The controls, the game play, the graphics ,( the press start to continue) etc all show they did NOT build this game as a PC first product as they claimed but used consoles (the Xbox360 for the most part) as the model. Most pc players are tired of getting left over’s in games because of low-end hardware consoles.

You do have a different point of view, and you are welcome to it. But you do come off as being a doormat giving excuses to a company that blatantly lied to the PC gamer community. This includes you. I don't like being a doormat, why do you?

If they were just truthful and stated this is what they are porting from Xbox and will patch DX11 in, many (including myself) would have been a bit ticked but I wouldn't bother ranting on and on about it and at least they would have been truthful which is respectful.

As a side note, I bet there are plenty of PS3 users that get pissed with Xbox ports as well; I know a lot of friends with PS3's that despise it with a passion. So i doubt your blanket of PC Gamers "whining" is legit. Most people get loud and angry when they spend money on something and find out it's inferior to what was advertised.
User avatar
Mrs shelly Sugarplum
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:16 am

Post » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:15 pm


I fail to understand how expressing our anger at the blatant lies put forth about this game is whining. We were told it would be better than the original, was going to be a PC game first and would have DX 11. I am not just talking about DX 11. I am talking about this game being an obvious port over to PC using the xbox as the model.
The controls, the game play, the graphics ,( the press start to continue) etc all show they did NOT build this game as a PC first product as they claimed but used consoles (the Xbox360 for the most part) as the model. Most pc players are tired of getting left over’s in games because of low-end hardware consoles.

You do have a different point of view, and you are welcome to it. But you do come off as being a doormat giving excuses to a company that blatantly lied to the PC gamer community. This includes you. I don't like being a doormat, why do you?

If they were just truthful and stated this is what they are porting from Xbox and will patch DX11 in, many (including myself) would have been a bit ticked but I wouldn't bother ranting on and on about it and at least they would have been truthful which is respectful.

As a side note, I bet there are plenty of PS3 users that get pissed with Xbox ports as well; I know a lot of friends with PS3's that despise it with a passion. So i doubt your blanket of PC Gamers "whining" is legit. Most people get loud and angry when they spend money on something and find out it's inferior to what was advertised.

As i said.. how about if the next Gears of war 3 gets dx7 ? i can easily say that they will cry, scream, rant about it more than us pc comunity.. i have experienced this, i have a 360 and i used to play MW2 sometimes.. and its unbelievabled how whiny the 360 comunity is.
User avatar
DeeD
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:50 pm


Return to Crysis