Cosmology of the Elder Scrolls

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:32 am

Greetings, honored scholars, many times have I walked past these great halls and never set foot inside - but now I come bearing a query that has left me perplexed. I am but a novice when it comes to the matter of the divines and the true nature of the cosmos, but tell me: is the mystical nature of the heavens truly as it says in texts such as http://www.imperial-library.info/content/cosmology or is this merely the religious interpretation of otherwise natural phenomena? I understand that magic is science in Tamriel, but if our own history is any judge then they could simply be false observations based more on tradition than inquisitive exploration.

The reason I'm asking is that I'm in the process of creating new night sky textures for Skyrim, and that got me thinking about what you would realistically expect to see in the skies above Tamriel: would there be wisps of galactic cloud as seen from our own planet, would the stars appear as densely, and so on. If the reality is that religion has offered a false explanation for the heavens being as they are, then the conditions on Tamriel might well look similar as on Earth (albeit with twice the number of moons, and them much closer.) But if it's all as mystical as claimed, then anything could be possible since the regular cosmological trends need not apply.

Any insights, or texts I might peruse to find out?
User avatar
Colton Idonthavealastna
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:13 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:54 am

I've always understood this as a religious interpretation of an actual physical universe. I know quite a few others have accepted the other side of this, and believe the religious portrayal is not a symbolic understanding, but factual. It's not a topic I've delved into for years, but at the time I believe the discussion settled on the fact that there is no hard confirmation either way.
User avatar
Josh Lozier
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:20 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 3:18 pm

Well given that the cosmology holds that the appearance of the night sky is due to mortal mental stress I'd say that for the appearance the difference is moot. From down here, holes to Aetherius and stars look rather alike.

Redguard had an Orrery that also showed a brightly coloured night sky. Perhaps you can use that for inspiration.

Redguard also had a starmap to show the relative position of the constellations in the sky.

Speaking of the Orrerys, they do consistently show the planets in impossible orbits.

http://www.imperial-library.info/content/morrowind-firmament also describes how the constellations rotate around Nirn in relation to the sun.

I'm not sure how this relates to the redguard starmap though, they may be incompatible.
User avatar
Sasha Brown
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:46 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:52 am

Thanks for the information. I guess ultimately Nirn is a fantasy world, and doesn't bear too much scrutiny for realistic astronomy and physics.

Or, in the words of another fantasy author: "Things just happen, what the hell." :P
User avatar
glot
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:41 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:39 am

Thanks for the information. I guess ultimately Nirn is a fantasy world, and doesn't bear too much scrutiny for realistic astronomy and physics.

Or, in the words of another fantasy author: "Things just happen, what the hell." :P


I think there are definitely physics and realism behind the universe in TES, but all of that knowledge died with the Dwemer. No other culture has the technology or philosophical aptitude to develop such outrageous ideas that contradict the Divines. The current knowledge of the night sky in the lore is only a way to explain what they see, it might not be accurate.
User avatar
RAww DInsaww
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 5:47 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:37 am

Nirn is a universe built on the bones of dead gods and the ever evolving memories of mortals. It makes no sense for it to follow Earth physics.
User avatar
Kayla Bee
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:34 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:37 pm

Nirn is a universe built on the bones of dead gods and the ever evolving memories of mortals. It makes no sense for it to follow Earth physics.


You realize that real cultures (Norse culture for example, and that is only one of many) on Earth believed the same things, right? You tell me if they turned out true or not.

That is the whole basis of science, nothing is ever final. Things always change as we learn more about them. To quote Albert Einstein: "All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree." Science explains what religion can't, and religion explains what science can't. The arts are a way to express what we know or believe about both of them.
User avatar
Noraima Vega
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:28 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:07 am

You realize that real cultures on Earth believed the same things, right? You tell me if they turned out true or not.

That is the whole basis of science, nothing is ever final. Things always change as we learn more about them. To quote Albert Einstein: "All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree."

Nirn is Nirn, Earth is Earth. What is true for one does not necessarily apply for the other. When the Lords of Misrule are mere attention gettings away, and the heart of a god did beat under red mountain, it is folly to doubt the existence of the earthbones.
User avatar
Nicole Elocin
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:12 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:11 am

Oh boy, not this discussion again.

On Earth, we can make measurements that tell us that our world is round or that stars are really far away burning balls of hydrogen. On Nirn, we have very real gods showing up to tell us how the world works, we have time breaking down became the time god has been broken, we have 'astronauts' who have traveled outside of the Mundus and can tell us that it isn't anything like our version of space. It isn't a case of mortals not knowing anything (though they most certainly aren't right about everything either).
User avatar
Dylan Markese
 
Posts: 3513
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:58 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:14 am

As the Pocket Guide to the Empire (3rd edition) notes, people have both been to the god-planets, Oblivion and Aetherius. In fact, they went to far as to have collected celestial minerals, which they kept at Firsthold.
Those are not superstitously ignorant people who don't grasp physics, those are people in a universe that simply does not work like ours.
User avatar
Marquis T
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:44 am

we have 'astronauts' who have traveled outside of the Mundus and can tell us that it isn't anything like our version of space

Interesting, where can I learn more of this tale?
User avatar
Gavin Roberts
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:14 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 4:31 am

As the Pocket Guide to the Empire (3rd edition) notes, people have both been to the god-planets, Oblivion and Aetherius. In fact, they went to far as to have collected celestial minerals, which they kept at Firsthold.
Those are not superstitously ignorant people who don't grasp physics, those are people in a universe that simply does not work like ours.


Just because portions of it are different doesn't mean that the entirety of it is different.
User avatar
Jade
 
Posts: 3520
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:42 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:04 pm

Just because portions of it are different doesn't mean that the entirety of it is different.

Doesn't mean there are similarities either.
User avatar
Richus Dude
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 1:17 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:10 pm

Interesting, where can I learn more of this tale?
http://www.imperial-library.info/content/pocket-guide-empire-third-edition-magic-aetherius

Also of interest: http://planetelderscrolls.gamespy.com/fms/Image.php?id=98065
That's from "Books of Vvardenfell". Back then, stuporstar checked this with the loreforum and afaik consensus was that this is the most canon drawing of the universe we had at the time (and IIRC it still is).

Just because portions of it are different doesn't mean that the entirety of it is different.
Look, they built magical spaceships and used them to reach an infinite space of magicka by flying through the sun. How does that even remotely work like our universe?
User avatar
Life long Observer
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:07 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:03 am

Doesn't mean there are similarities either.


Now we're arguing semantics. This is like arguing the Ancient Alien theory, there is no proof or disproof which leads to an endless argument. Obviously magic exists in the lore, which I'm not trying to argue against, but science also exists. In real history (yes I am aware that TES is not real), people used "magic" to explain things they can't see. No one in TES has seen every single thing when it comes to the workings of the universe. Until someone applies the scientific method to various aspects of universal workings in TES, it is pointless to say whether something can or can't exist. I'm just trying to point out the possibility that TES does have some physical reality to it.

@Anonytroll: We have "magical" spaceships too if you went back and time and asked medieval scientists how they work. Magic and reality are perspective.
User avatar
Jonathan Braz
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:29 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:51 am

That's from "Books of Vvardenfell". Back then, stuporstar checked this with the loreforum and afaik consensus was that this is the most canon drawing of the universe we had at the time (and IIRC it still is).

Perfect! Exactly what I was looking for, thanks. :D
User avatar
Daniel Holgate
 
Posts: 3538
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 1:02 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:49 am

Now we're arguing semantics. This is like arguing the Ancient Alien theory, there is no proof or disproof which leads to an endless argument. Obviously magic exists in the lore, which I'm not trying to argue against, but science also exists. In real history (yes I am aware that TES is not real), people used "magic" to explain things they can't see. No one in TES has seen every single thing when it comes to the workings of the universe. [/quite]
I don't think you understand what you are saying. Until someone applies the scientific method to various aspects of universal workings in TES, it is pointless to say whether something can or can't exist. I'm just trying to point out the possibility that TES does have some physical reality to it.

@Anonytroll: We have "magical" spaceships too if you went back and time and asked medieval scientists how they work. Magic and reality are perspective.
You'd be hardpressed to find any medieval scientist who used their spaceships to fly to the planets and bring back celestial minerals. Which is what happened in TES.
I'm not even sure what you saying anymore, but seem to be arguing that the scientific method somehow isn't applicable because it's not giving you the results you want (e.g. they really can reach fluffy cloud heaven when flying through the sun). That's patently ridiculous.

Perfect! Exactly what I was looking for, thanks. :D

Happy to help. Scratch "canon", and replace it with "accurate" though, I'm a bit through a blender today.
User avatar
Tikarma Vodicka-McPherson
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:15 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 3:42 pm

You'd be hardpressed to find any medieval scientist who used their spaceships to fly to the planets and bring back celestial minerals. Which is what happened in TES.
I'm not even sure what you saying anymore, but seem to be arguing that the scientific method somehow isn't applicable because it's not giving you the results you want (e.g. they really can reach fluffy cloud heaven when flying through the sun). That's patently ridiculous.


I'm not saying that at all. Magic obviously exists like in the example that you gave, and I'm not claiming that is physical possible. The scientific method has nothing to do with physical possibility, it is still applicable to magical phenomena like your example. I'm saying that there could very well be real life physics behind TES lore that none of us are aware of. Then again it could all be magic-based, but I'm trying to point out the possibility that it does hold some physical similarities with real life. To say that anything is final (unless confirmed by Bethesda) is contradictory to scientific theory. Judging by how a lot of TES lore is intentionally vague, I'm betting that Bethesda wants us to come up with the conclusions on our own.
User avatar
x a million...
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:59 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:32 pm

One more question, while the thread is still up: are you supposed to be able to see the stars through the dark side of the moon, or was that "bug" retconned?
User avatar
Genevieve
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 4:22 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:32 am

One more question, while the thread is still up: are you supposed to be able to see the stars through the dark side of the moon, or was that "bug" retconned?


I read something about the transparent moon but I can't remember if it was a bug or intentional.
User avatar
Shaylee Shaw
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:55 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:07 am

I read something about the transparent moon but I can't remember if it was a bug or intentional.

Yes, that's what I asked - but I'd like to get an answer from someone who actually knows.
User avatar
Mari martnez Martinez
 
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:39 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:59 am


That's from "Books of Vvardenfell". Back then, stuporstar checked this with the loreforum and afaik consensus was that this is the most canon drawing of the universe we had at the time (and IIRC it still is).



Indeed although wouldn't Necromancers Moon be orbiting Arkay now ?
User avatar
Sabrina Steige
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:51 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:20 am

I've always understood this as a religious interpretation of an actual physical universe. I know quite a few others have accepted the other side of this, and believe the religious portrayal is not a symbolic understanding, but factual. It's not a topic I've delved into for years, but at the time I believe the discussion settled on the fact that there is no hard confirmation either way.

There's no hard confirmation either way.

But the view of an Earth-like scientific solar system is impossible. At least until I hear a convincing explanation of how two moons can suddenly disappear from the sky for an extended period, how new constellations can be created and destroyed according to events on Nirn, how stars can pass across the heavens when the normal flow of time is disrupted.

The people of Tamriel are not medieval ignoramuses. They have traveled to Oblivion and Aetherius and through the void, by magic and by vehicles. They know what is there.

There are various other interpretations, but some of them are really just the preferences of Flat-Earthers.

No other culture has the technology or philosophical aptitude to develop such outrageous ideas that contradict the Divines. The current knowledge of the night sky in the lore is only a way to explain what they see, it might not be accurate.

You are mistaken, and your parallels to real-world religious misconceptions of the cosmos don't hold up.

The Dwemeri understanding of the universe was not that advanced versus current Altmeri and Imperial science. Both these cultures have space programs. No joke.

So far as physical laws go, they do exist, but are divine constructs. This is also not in doubt, because the Dwemer studied them scientifically, and were able to break these laws. The ultimate law of the universe is mythopoetic reflection of the Enantiomorph, itself a term from real-world physics. If you wish, understand Anu and Padomay as two opposing atomic particles orbiting each other before a Big Bang.



I would guess that the transparent moon in Morrowind was a glitch that inspired a bit of lore.
User avatar
Chris Cross Cabaret Man
 
Posts: 3301
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:33 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:18 pm

I would guess that the transparent moon in Morrowind was a glitch that inspired a bit of lore.

Indeed, but was it ever retconned back out again (I don't recall seeing transparent moons in Oblivion) or does it remain canonical?
User avatar
xx_Jess_xx
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:01 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:07 am

One more question, while the thread is still up: are you supposed to be able to see the stars through the dark side of the moon, or was that "bug" retconned?
I don't know. TIL has them with actual holes in the Temple Zero http://www.imperial-library.info/content/cosmology writeup, but I'm not aware of any other source claiming the same. Probably a dog ate my homework moment?
You can sometimes see the stars through the dark side of the moons in Oblivion too, depending on how strategically placed the clouds are, btw.

Indeed although wouldn't Necromancers Moon be orbiting Arkay now ?
I don't know. It surely is somewhere between Nirn and Arkay.
User avatar
sally coker
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:51 pm

Next

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion