Ah, very very true. Anyone could pick up a crossbow in Morrowind, Oblivion, or even most likely Skyrim and easily pickoff a target, whereas, I personally choose a bow because it's personally gratifying to pick someone off with a bow :hubbahubba:
I'm wondering how damage would be dealt with. with marksmanship in Oblivion, damage was related to strength, but if strength is not a limiting factor when using a cross bow (it seems reload time is the primary disadvange to their use), then how could it possibly fall under a marksmanship skill that is governed by strength?
There's two books by the guy who wrote Sherlock Homeboy (Sir Arthur Conan Doyle)
Despite penning a timeless character known for unshakable reason and unshakable adherence to logical inquiry, Conan Doyle was actually very supersticious, he attended seances and psychic readings. http://www.neatorama.com/2010/01/04/the-end-of-a-beautiful-friendship-houdini-and-arthur-conan-doyle/ that his good friend Harry Houdini has supernatural powers despite Houdini's repeated efforts to show him that all the magical apparitions and happenings were merely trickery or coincidence. I have personally not read any Sherlock Holmes, and though i'm sure it is every bit as good as people have said, I feel a certain disinclination to grant him credit towards any supposedly factual revelations know his background. Call me discriminitory, but greatness is rare on such multiple planes.