People all over the forum are complaining that the textures and etc are dumbed down and such compared to crysis 1. you guys ever stop to think WHY they did that? WHYY OHH WHYYY are the textures not as good as the ones in crysis 1? ...
Take yourself back in time when Crysis 1 was first released in 2007, when it came out there was hardly ANY computer that could run the game on max settings. the game looked absolutely spectacular but it costed a sh*t ton of money to build a machine that could run it(4 YEARS AGO! technology moves fast)
Now if you compare a screenshot of crysis 1 with a screenshot of crysis 2, you can easily tell without a debate that crysis 2 looks much better. but when you put the crysis 2 textures under a super powerful magnifying glass, they look like SH*T!!... as other people describe.
Crytek didnt just aim for the next next generation of eye candy, they tried their damn best to improve the performance of the new engine on modern aged machines.
During the first week of playing crysis 2, i thought i was getting smooth frame rates because of my crossfired ati 5870's. Then recently i found out that crossfire was not working at all on my pc when everyone else was getting flickering video and i wasn't. i later found out that one of my power cables to one of the cards was loose, i put the cable back in... crossfire works like it should now and now my video flickers in crysis 2! i done found a temp fix for it so dont troll
We should be saying "GREAT JOB CRYTEK!!" instead of raging -_-