» Thu Apr 21, 2011 9:45 pm
Well, CoD doesnt have a freekin nanosuit! Adds a whole new level of tactics and **** to do. But yeah, I much prefer the smaller maps without vehicles then Crysis 1s Power Struggle, that **** was boring (to me). I also prefer the more linear maps in SP instead of the big explorable environment. Im not interested in exploring, I want to blow some **** up! If this makes it more similar to CoD then so be it, as long as the game is good. Nothing wrong with CoD, its only the best selling game. So why not take some of the good features of a best selling game?
MP in C2 is very CoD rip off, but its also much better then C1. Progression, customizable classes with perks and stuff. I also much more prefer the way we choose classes instead of picking up or buying our weapons and then having to customize them after each death.
Crysis 1 was pretty much just a benchmark for me. I played through it once, same with warhead. After that I just used it to test my rig.
All the whining from everyone just seem to be about DX11 and bugs. Both of which will be fixed. Not alot of people complaining about the gameplay itself, because they cant get themselves to play the game because its DX9 (Oh the horror!). Bugs are understandable, but no need to over react, just give it some time. The last thing is story, and sure, this I can understand that throw people off and theres nothing more I can say about this. But luckily for me I dont give a **** about the story and I have the patience to wait for DX11 and bug fixes (I dont have problems with bugs because there are workarounds for most of them), so whats left is great gameplay, yay for me!
Yep, players who are more into CoD than Crysis are likely to appreciate C2. I can see how someone likes to just run, blow **** up and watch cut-scenes. But please don't talk about "a whole new level of tactics and ****" with these corridor maps and ridiculous A.I targets spread around the roads, and C1 in one paragraph. That's what the "exploring" was, that you disregarded for benchmark and most Crysis fans are disappointed for.
Actually, you have just heard "most people complain about DX11" from some fanboy in denial. They like to shove all the complaints off like that. In fact, most complaints are exactly about game play, including the ridiculous A.I and corridor maps, right after technical problems and bugs. This is because of the disappointment of being lied about a PC game, to people expecting sequel to the realistic sandbox gameplay of C1.
It's easy to see it's the benchmark people who care more about DX11 than gameplay, not Crysis fans for what it (C1) is. But, at least we agree on C2 being Call of Nanosuit. It's up to everyone if they like it or not.