Crysis 2 with DX11 what hardware will do it?

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:15 pm

I am in love with this update, Crysis 2 looks alot better that I thought it would, bravo crytek, really good job.

But now I am left with a PC that can't handle it, it's like the original crysis all over again :L
I upgraded to a more powerful PC just befor Crysis 2 came out, just so I could play it at max settings from day one, and I was able to do that, but with the DX11 patch my PC is now stuggling with the game, so I guess Crytek gave us PC gamers what we wanted.

Well anyway, I am wondering what hardware will I need to get Crysis 2 with DX11 and mabye even the high texture pack aswell to all run smoothly, with everything at it's ultra settings.

I also won't be playing the game any higher than 1680 x 1050, since that is as far as my current monitor will go.

These are my sytem specs.

- Intel i7 950 @ 3.07GHz
- EVGA x58 SLI 3 Motherboard
- EVGA GTX 470 (1280MB)
- 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1600
- Cooler Master Silent Pro M 850W

At the moment I think getting anouther EVGA GTX 470 (1280MB) and SLI it up with my curret card would do the trick, since I thin graphics is the only area of my PC that needs an upgrade, since I can't see why I would need to have more CPU power or RAM.

What would you guys/girls suggest I do, get anouther card and go SLI? or look at other GPU's all together?

Thanks.
User avatar
Lindsay Dunn
 
Posts: 3247
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:34 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:14 am

overclock your cpu to 3.6 or higher first, it will up your frames, then get another GTX470 if you need more frames. also are you running windows 7 64 bit, because it performs better than vista.
User avatar
James Smart
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:07 am

Even the gtx 580 can't max this game to give you an idea of what's required, the MP uses about 1.2 GB VRAM so SLIing 470s would be good for that, SP uses 1.5 though.
If you do SLI you'd probably have to OC your CPU to nearer 4MHz, your PSU should be ok with that too.
I dunno, ...you don't want to spend a fortune on it that's for sure, i'd try SLIing your 470 cause the next nvidia driver will probably give us better performance anyways.
If not gonna keep your 470, i'd go for 580 and OC it like i'm doin' or you could SLI a pair of 2GB 560s maybe?
User avatar
Céline Rémy
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:45 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:04 am

you absolutely need to overclock your cpu to 3.6 or better, thats the res i play at and my i7 920 is at 3.8 with 5870 crossfire and I completely max the game at 60+fps at 1680x1050. the cpu overclock is the key to boosting your frames. another 470 will still need the cpu overclock for 60+ fps.
User avatar
T. tacks Rims
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:35 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:59 am

okay thank guys, so that plan is, overclock from 3.07Ghz to 3.6Ghz and get anouther EVGA GTX 470, right?

I really want to stay clear from overclocking GPU's, I have had 3 factory OC GPU's in the past, all of them either dind't work or where short lived, so I'm also a bit worried about overclocking my CPU? could I get 3.6Ghz on a i7 950 with the standard heatsink or will I need to look at other heatsinks? I don't want to go for anything to expensive though, also I have a Coolermaster HAF X, a really well ventilated case.

thanks again.
User avatar
Lil Miss
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 12:57 pm

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 2:17 pm

also, I have never overclocked anything myself befor, so I need a few poiters for overclocking a i7 950, becuase I really don't want to damage my PC.
User avatar
Lindsay Dunn
 
Posts: 3247
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:34 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:37 am

standard heatsink should be fine, i run mine all day at 3.8 with the standard heat sink. for OC cpu just raise the base clock, and add voltage and QPI. GOOGLE your motherboard and you will find overclock guides for your hardware.
User avatar
lacy lake
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:13 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:38 am

also, I have never overclocked anything myself befor, so I need a few poiters for overclocking a i7 950, becuase I really don't want to damage my PC.

CPU clocks work like this:

CPU multiplier X Bus Speed = CPU Frequency

So... To get to 3.6GHz, start off by testing 3.2, then 3.4, then try 3.6 to finalize. Multipliers cannot be changed so tinkering with the bus speed is the only way to increase CPU frequency.

To get the desired clock speed.. let's say for example, the multiplier is the 16 and you want a 3200MHz clock (3.2GHz):

3200 / 16 = 200MHz bus speed.

So, you would need to go into your motherboard bios and raise the bus speed to 200MHz in this example.

Now.. To keep this in mind, the bus speed also effects the memory frequency so you will also be overclocking that.. At the clocks you are trying to reach though, raising memory voltage shouldn't be necessary.

Now... After you enter your desired bus speed, save and leave the bios and boot into windows like usual.

Download and install a program called Prime95. This program stress tests your CPU to help ensure that your overclock is stable. Run the "blend test" for eight hours to ensure 100% stability... If you encounter any errors, bluescreens, hard lockups of windows, etc, go back into your motherboards bios and raise the CPU voltage a notch and start testing again.

Also, download and install a program called HWMonitor. This program monitors the temperature sensors on your hardware and will provide you with valuable information on how hot the hardware is... During the 8 hour Prime95 test, make sure that your CPU core temperature does not exceed 90C. If it does, stop testing immediately. There are several solutions to bring temperature down.. A better heatsink, liquid cooling on a water block, or by chance, your heatsink is seated wrong on the CPU and is not efficiently pulling heat away from it. The first two options will cost a fair chunk of cash, ranging from $50 - 100 USD.

To reach your desired clock speed of 3.6GHz, testing will take about three days... So stay patient. If you rush through the process, there is a chance that your overclock is not actually stable and it can damage your hardware.

Hope this helps! :)
User avatar
Crystal Clear
 
Posts: 3552
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:42 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:53 pm

currently nothing until they fix the optimization issues. I borrowd my friends 6990 today, this way i could have 2 in xfire so quad GPU all overclocked to 950core and 1375mem. and my FPS would drop randomly to the low 20s and i hovered around 30 to 40 FPS the majority of the game.

Keep in mind this is the fastest GPU configuration you can get.
User avatar
electro_fantics
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:50 pm

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:13 am

also, I have never overclocked anything myself befor, so I need a few poiters for overclocking a i7 950, becuase I really don't want to damage my PC.

CPU clocks work like this:

CPU multiplier X Bus Speed = CPU Frequency

So... To get to 3.6GHz, start off by testing 3.2, then 3.4, then try 3.6 to finalize. Multipliers cannot be changed so tinkering with the bus speed is the only way to increase CPU frequency.

To get the desired clock speed.. let's say for example, the multiplier is the 16 and you want a 3200MHz clock (3.2GHz):

3200 / 16 = 200MHz bus speed.

So, you would need to go into your motherboard bios and raise the bus speed to 200MHz in this example.

Now.. To keep this in mind, the bus speed also effects the memory frequency so you will also be overclocking that.. At the clocks you are trying to reach though, raising memory voltage shouldn't be necessary.

Now... After you enter your desired bus speed, save and leave the bios and boot into windows like usual.

Download and install a program called Prime95. This program stress tests your CPU to help ensure that your overclock is stable. Run the "blend test" for eight hours to ensure 100% stability... If you encounter any errors, bluescreens, hard lockups of windows, etc, go back into your motherboards bios and raise the CPU voltage a notch and start testing again.

Also, download and install a program called HWMonitor. This program monitors the temperature sensors on your hardware and will provide you with valuable information on how hot the hardware is... During the 8 hour Prime95 test, make sure that your CPU core temperature does not exceed 90C. If it does, stop testing immediately. There are several solutions to bring temperature down.. A better heatsink, liquid cooling on a water block, or by chance, your heatsink is seated wrong on the CPU and is not efficiently pulling heat away from it. The first two options will cost a fair chunk of cash, ranging from $50 - 100 USD.

To reach your desired clock speed of 3.6GHz, testing will take about three days... So stay patient. If you rush through the process, there is a chance that your overclock is not actually stable and it can damage your hardware.

Hope this helps! :)

Nice one dude, thanks alot, this should help me out... still very nervous though :/ but atleast I have somewhere to go from.
User avatar
Rinceoir
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:54 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:04 am

If you're going to cool your CPU on air, go with the best: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835608018&Tpk=noctua%20nh%20d-14
User avatar
Lisa
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:57 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:22 am

Seen this on another site looks pretty truthful benchmark rather than some bold claims

Image
User avatar
Horse gal smithe
 
Posts: 3302
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:23 pm

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 3:02 pm

seriously google your motherboard and cpu for overclocking, there are sites that give you screens and step by step instructions, most likely you won't even need to raise voltage to only go to 3.6. here is something to look at. http://www.guru3d.com/article/evga-x58-sli-review/9. good luck.
User avatar
Kelly James
 
Posts: 3266
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:33 pm

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:50 pm

Seen this on another site looks pretty truthful benchmark rather than some bold claims

Image

where is the bold claims about 1920x1080 in this thread?
User avatar
Brad Johnson
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 7:19 pm

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 2:12 am


where is the bold claims about 1920x1080 in this thread?

Not in this thread but look at the performance thread, you can tell most people are talking **** in there about what fps they actually achieve on full ultra.

Nice to see some real benchmark scores coming through though, looks like a 580 or above is required for this game without no drops below 30.

Here's 1280 x 1024

Image
User avatar
Taylor Tifany
 
Posts: 3555
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:22 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:13 am

from the look of those benchmarks its a bit sad that the 6970 and 6950 just aren't performing as they should :(
User avatar
mike
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:51 pm

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:19 pm

those numbers look close, not bad. but anyway I run at 1680x1050, 5870 crossfire 900/1250, i7920 @3.6, and 6 gigs Patriot sector 7. up to the level after downed bird where you are in the building and the helicopter is below and the soldiers are arguing, my minimum is 45FPS, except for check points where it drops for a quick moment to almost nothing. most of the time my frames is in the mid 50s to 60+. maybe it will drop as i go. nice chart though, probably about right, all single boards though crysis 2 does like SLI and Crossfire.
User avatar
Pat RiMsey
 
Posts: 3306
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:22 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:35 pm

GTX590 is owning but the price of one is ridiculous.
User avatar
Lexy Dick
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:15 pm

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:02 am

from the look of those benchmarks its a bit sad that the 6970 and 6950 just aren't performing as they should :(

Note these are min/avg scores not min/max.

This game has got so many ups and downs, in one part you might be hitting 60 fps but as soon as you hit a tessellated area like gate keepers it will drop all the way down to the low 20's.

Anyone can look at the sky and get a good framerate it's how the cards perform at the tough bits that matter.
User avatar
Jack Bryan
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 2:31 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:26 am

I would recommend You to buy another GTX 470 and SLI them.

1920x1080 DX11 all ultra settings and high textures on, my average FPS is 65 but sometimes drops to 50 (SP and MP)

My rig
P7P55D Premium
Intel i7 870@3.6 HyperThreding enabled
GTX470 SLI (in game i force to 100% vent speed sometimes overclock a bit them)
850W PSU
DDR3 8Gb RAM @ 1600 (2gb x 4)
Crucial 256GB RealSSD C300 2.5 SATA6Gbs
User avatar
Czar Kahchi
 
Posts: 3306
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:56 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:23 pm

K, i was getting 60fps at 6080x1080 before the patch and dx 11.
Now getting 20 to 25 fps with dx 11 and high res textures. But also getting 20 to 25 fps when running at 1920x1080 so something isnt right

My spec
evga 4 way classified.
12 Gigs ocz gold @2000
intel 980x @4.1Ghz
3 x 480gtx's
3 x 42inch oled fullhd monitors in 2d surround
User avatar
Neliel Kudoh
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:39 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 2:06 pm

K, i was getting 60fps at 6080x1080 before the patch and dx 11.
Now getting 20 to 25 fps with dx 11 and high res textures. But also getting 20 to 25 fps when running at 1920x1080 so something isnt right

My spec
evga 4 way classified.
12 Gigs ocz gold @2000
intel 980x @4.1Ghz
3 x 480gtx's
3 x 42inch oled fullhd monitors in 2d surround

There's a V-sync problem mentioned on the forum somewhere, something to do with it being stuck at 24 hz.
User avatar
Neil
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:08 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 2:02 am

I have:

Athlon64 X2 6000+ (3ghz)
4gb DDR2 RAM
Geforce GTX 460 SE 1GB

and it has trouble with everything on Ultra... It's still very playable, but there are considerable slowdowns in some places. I do have an SLI motherboard, but I am only using one video card right now. I am planning on getting another GTX 460 SE for SLI soon, it should make the game completely smooth again, like it was with everything on Extreme. :)

I'm guessing these minimum specs should run it smooth:

quad-core CPU
4-8gb RAM
Geforce GTX 480/580 or Radeon 6970

The DX11 patch does seem to be a bit imperfect right now, especially with tess. enabled.
User avatar
Ricky Rayner
 
Posts: 3339
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:13 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:52 pm

I decided to get back into PC gaming and bought a new rig. Foolishly I expected to be able to run all the modern games at native 2560x1600 with everything cranked up. No chance. For C2 (DX11 Patch and High Tex) set to Ultra, I dip down into the 20's in terms of FPS. Sure looks nice though.

thats with a 2600k running at 4.3Ghz and 2xGTX590s in quad-sli. Not sure what you need to run this game but I don't think its available yet !
User avatar
Angela Woods
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:15 pm


Return to Crysis