Damn a play crysis 2 multiplayer first time and see small maps no vehicles!!! Is not **** call of duty bro.... Need make normal or big maps can hide from enemy and use tanks or flying vehicles...

So good remeber time from crysis wars.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtcsbuISb50

Multiplayer nuke

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fDAni9O05c

And **** crysis 2 mp.. Wtf??? Where vehicles??? Maybe by in crysis 3????

Combine the best of both games.

Although the OP has not posted in very clear English I get his point and agree with his post.

-Dual

Yes please that would be great!!!

Crysis Wars was awesome,but Crysis 3 is on consoles.Crytek would have to butcher the big maps to make them run on console.And they'll port the same maps to PC. I would love to see Power Struggle in Crysis 3,but I want a proper mode with big maps,venicles and number of players.To be honest I doubt we'll see it in C3 and we'll just get the generic COD clone that the multiplayer of Crysis 2 was - the number of pre-order bonuses confirms that.

I'd rather have them invent something new. I am not keen to see every single installment of the game beeing the same. It shouldn't be like Crysis 1, it shouldn't be like Crysis 2 either.

Except for Power Struggle, I'd love to get that mode back...

Crysis Wars was awesome,but Crysis 3 is on consoles.Crytek would have to butcher the big maps to make them run on console.And they'll port the same maps to PC. I would love to see Power Struggle in Crysis 3,but I want a proper mode with big maps,venicles and number of players.To be honest I doubt we'll see it in C3 and we'll just get the generic COD clone that the multiplayer of Crysis 2 was - the number of pre-order bonuses confirms that.
You know that Crysis 1 is on consoles right? The "Consoles can't render big areas" excuse is invalid now.

Crysis Wars was awesome,but Crysis 3 is on consoles.Crytek would have to butcher the big maps to make them run on console.And they'll port the same maps to PC. I would love to see Power Struggle in Crysis 3,but I want a proper mode with big maps,venicles and number of players.To be honest I doubt we'll see it in C3 and we'll just get the generic COD clone that the multiplayer of Crysis 2 was - the number of pre-order bonuses confirms that.
You know that Crysis 1 is on consoles right? The "Consoles can't render big areas" excuse is invalid now.
I'm not seeing Crysis Wars on consoles.They just ported the singleplayer.And why has Crysis 2 such linear and scripted campaign(compared to Crysis at least,it's more open that other shooters),since consoles can obviosly handle Crysis?

I'm not seeing Crysis Wars on consoles.
Wouldn't be worth it anyways.
They just ported the singleplayer.
Yes, and that's enough reasons for me to believe, that Consoles can indeed render large areas (because the Sp was an entire large area).
And why has Crysis 2 such linear and scripted campaign(compared to Crysis at least,it's more open that other shooters),since consoles can obviosly handle Crysis?
Because scripted, linear, over the top, and stylish shooters attract more people (mostly kids). It's not because it is on console, it is, because Crytek wanted to become big on the main market, which currently is rewarding Call of Duty and consorts for beeing "revolutionary".

Agree it, if you were someone at Crytek and you were at the brink of getting fire because your game didn't attract too much people, you would say: "Let's streamline it a bit, so we can attract more people."

Perspective wise, I can partially understand Cryteks steps with Crysis 2, not all of them but some.

Crysis Wars was awesome,but Crysis 3 is on consoles.Crytek would have to butcher the big maps to make them run on console.And they'll port the same maps to PC. I would love to see Power Struggle in Crysis 3,but I want a proper mode with big maps,venicles and number of players.To be honest I doubt we'll see it in C3 and we'll just get the generic COD clone that the multiplayer of Crysis 2 was - the number of pre-order bonuses confirms that.
You know that Crysis 1 is on consoles right? The "Consoles can't render big areas" excuse is invalid now.
Not quite.

Crytek want to make the best looking game on consoles; it's this which will make sure you don't get big areas.

On such a limited machine, something has to give. Crysis 1 was worse looking than Crysis 2 on consoles, because of the visual tweaks and techniques which had to occur in order to make it work.

+ One Bazillion

Put the full on version of PS on PC, and a toned down smaller version (less vehicles, smaller maps) on console. Similar to conquest on BF3, but it will probably need to be toned down even more.

I think I read in an interview with some Crytek guy that while the graphics would be best on PC, the overall objective is to make sure that across all platforms they can produce the same experience.

Why is that the objective, to produce the same experience (or similar experience, can't remember the exact wording), shouldn't it be to produce the best experience possible on each platform.

+ One Bazillion

Put the full on version of PS on PC, and a toned down smaller version (less vehicles, smaller maps) on console. Similar to conquest on BF3, but it will probably need to be toned down even more.

I think I read in an interview with some Crytek guy that while the graphics would be best on PC, the overall objective is to make sure that across all platforms they can produce the same experience.

Why is that the objective, to produce the same experience (or similar experience, can't remember the exact wording), shouldn't it be to produce the best experience possible on each platform.
I (hopefully) believe that he meant gameplay-wise. Graphics and speed will always be superior on PC, and there never will be a doubt about it. However, I think they're trying to make it so consoles can still have decent graphics and great gameplay.