Curie, and 'lover's embrace'.

Post » Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:01 pm

Interesting situation...genetically, she's your daughter.

User avatar
Amanda Leis
 
Posts: 3518
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:57 am

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:43 am

She's a robot.

User avatar
Lucie H
 
Posts: 3276
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:46 pm

Post » Fri Jan 15, 2016 6:46 pm

Not later if you do the quest.

User avatar
Baylea Isaacs
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 11:58 am

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:47 am

Her body is that of an android, put together from grown/manufactured synthetic human parts. (I don't think they clarify exactly how the pieces of synth are created, but I imagine they are grown somewhere in robotics) The pseudo-science of them being based on Shaun's unspoiled DNA cannot possibly mean they are entirely his biological children (or genetic clones), otherwise they would all look like him. Bethesda of course leaves it vague (it is fiction after all), but having the same DNA means inheriting given traits (predisposition to diseases, features, etc.) Synths can be constructed to mimic anyone's DNA (e.g. Mayor McDonough is an exact copy, apart from being "superior" and the cranial synth components). If synths are truly genetic children to Father (or clones/siblings), then those genes are nothing like those in the real world.

User avatar
Suzie Dalziel
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:48 am

Only thing I can think of would be that Sean's DNA was used as a sort of control for future synth production. They needed his DNA not so much as to directly clone from, but as a comparison to see what kinds of mutations arise from environmental effects. Remember, they couldn't use their own genes because they had already been exposed to Radiation long enough for it to permanently affect future generations.


By having a pure strain example, you can easily see how radiation affects the DNA structure, and possibly reverse those effects.


For Synth production, you'd have a better grasp of what changes to their DNA they will likely be at-risk for by operating above ground, and can tinker around to lessen those effects. That way, they can stay on the field for longer periods of time without loosing (unplanned) operational effectiveness.
User avatar
Erika Ellsworth
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:52 am

Post » Fri Jan 15, 2016 6:05 pm


If you put it that way, shouldn't she be your grand-daughter ?

User avatar
Rob Davidson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:52 am

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 6:55 am

Genetically, she's probably not. I think Gen 3 synths would look more similar to each other if they were clones of Shaun, they probably only get a small portion of their DNA from him.

User avatar
Kelsey Anna Farley
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 10:33 pm

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:34 am

it's not that simple :-)


she's originally a mister (!!) handy.


dr collins (iirc) of vault 81reprograms her ai with a personality matrix modeled after his wife, with some upgrades.


he also encourages her to develop a sense of personality by granting her personal property (her terminal).


86 (iirc) years later, you enter the scene and help her get transferred into a synth body because her robot body limits just that personality's development.



so, what we're romancing, folks, is essentially: a transgender robot's ai, remade to resemble a man's memories of a dead woman, running on bio-hardware that is genetically your daughter.



i'd like to quote an expert on this.


prof. goodfeels?


"faaaaaaar out..."


:-)

User avatar
Holli Dillon
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:54 am

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 1:56 am

She's not the SS's daughter.



Shaun's DNA was used to map the 'pure-human' genome which was later replicated and used in the manufacture of the Synths synthetic organic components. Genetically speaking, the Synths are probably no more related to the sole survivor than any of us are to each other.

User avatar
Sasha Brown
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:46 pm

Post » Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:40 pm

I said genetically.



You can put whatever spin on it you want, and throw in some pseudo science based on who knows what (in game terms), but the basis of her DNA is that it derives from the player character, and his or her wife/husband.



What we do know from talks with 'Father', is that only his DNA has been used to create the Gen-3 synth's, meaning that she is cloned from Shaun, certainly not identically cloned obviously.



You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig.

User avatar
Latino HeaT
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:21 pm

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 2:30 am

basically what they did was use shauns DNA as a basis for a genetic soup to create the synths outer skin. similar to the terminators. Shaun himself calls them his children when you first meet him.

User avatar
Lizzie
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:51 am

Post » Fri Jan 15, 2016 6:47 pm

I don't think it works that way. 1) I don't think synths can reproduce so any actual blood kinship is irrelevant. 2) I think the Institute basically needed to map a human genome that wasn't riddled with radiation induced mutations. So I don't think they are cutting off little pices of Father and growing synths from it. I think they are just using his DNA as a baseline for what healthy human DNA *should* look like.

User avatar
CHARLODDE
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:33 pm

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 1:43 am


And, genetically speaking, she's not.



I mean if want to continue to pretend you're committing incist with her, by all means. :shrug:









Indeed. Essentially, they mapped the "pure-human" genome (i.e. the undamaged and altered human genome) using Shaun's DNA. Creating that baseline you describe which they could replicate in production of The Synths. This is how its described in-game.







He's speaking metaphorically. What he says is they are his children "Through science." Notable in that he doesn't say "Through our DNA, we are related."



The Gen-1 Synths call you 'father' too. And unless we're going to take their statement literal as well, its safe to say its a Father-Child relationship in the sense of Creator-Creation and not a literal one for the Gen-3's.


User avatar
Amanda Leis
 
Posts: 3518
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:57 am

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 2:03 am

Okay, so if she has Shaun's DNA, how is she not genetically related to you?



Beth just came up with some pseudo science to explain it...you simply can't create something from nothing, even when playing god with genetics.

User avatar
Harry-James Payne
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 6:58 am

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:14 am

Fun fact: in terms of genetic diversity, once you get to the second cousin they may as well be strangers.

User avatar
Isabella X
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:44 am

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 5:28 am



Hmmm. I've been out of touch with a few of my cousins for FAR too long. Haha, jk....
User avatar
lexy
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:37 pm

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 6:57 am







Synthetic living tissue modeled after "Fathers" DNA I think is the easiest way to explain it. So, no you are not related to synths they just used his DNA as a model for synthetic DNA.

User avatar
Alyna
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:54 am

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:45 am

Then the doctor on the prydwen asked you about you had had six with non humans the answers could have been far more interesting.


Robots dont count right? Does ghouls?


Let me see, 5 ghouls an supermutant, two robots, 7 synts not sure if one of them count as synt or robot here.


The truth: how many companions has triggered lovers embrace.

User avatar
natalie mccormick
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:36 am

Post » Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:37 pm

you tryin' to bang the whole commonwealth? :-))

(the non-human parts anyway)

User avatar
Kirsty Wood
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:41 am

Post » Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:01 pm

With that French accent I don't really care. Rrrrrrrrrrow!

User avatar
Captian Caveman
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 5:36 am

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 2:55 am

I don't think that's really an accurate interpretation of the situation. They used the genetic material as something of a base material for building the synths, but that's a great deal different than actually being a biologically related family member or anything like that.

User avatar
Charleigh Anderson
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:17 am

Post » Fri Jan 15, 2016 8:20 pm

q: what else makes somebody "closely related" but their genes?

User avatar
Monika Krzyzak
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 11:29 pm

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 3:14 am

Spin it any way you want but actually she's your son...

User avatar
xemmybx
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:01 pm

Post » Fri Jan 15, 2016 8:56 pm



Actually she's your transgendered robot son...
User avatar
Austin England
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:16 pm

Post » Sat Jan 16, 2016 3:13 am

It really doesn't matter where her genes came from, as there is no indication that s synth can biologically reproduce.



So there would be no worry of inbred mutant children. She is essentially a love-bot, with an intoxicating accent.

User avatar
Trish
 
Posts: 3332
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 9:00 am

Next

Return to Fallout 4