Cut content and the complaining

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 2:26 pm

An ES games only competition is previous ES games, if it doesnt measure up to them, its inferior.


..What the heck am I reading?
User avatar
Paula Rose
 
Posts: 3305
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:12 am

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:49 am

Well, we'll see 11-11-11.

Going by Beth history and what they've said, we already know. Yes, its series. The Elder Scroll series.
User avatar
Celestine Stardust
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:22 pm

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:19 pm

This is in relation to spell making (a cornerstone of the series) mostly, but unarmed, acrobatics, speed, including anything thats out (non title specific) that we dont know about yet etc. as well.

Yes, but you can't claim speed, acrobatics, unarmed are out - as we have not seen all the perk trees - it's unlikely, but until you have seen all the trees, you can't 100% make that assumption. There is no specific athletics or acrobatics skill, sure - but it does not mean speed and jumping being increaseable are out.

Spell making has been confirmed as not included. But they chose to do so for what I see as a valid reason "taking the magic out of magic by making it numbers on a spreadsheet" - sure, I didn't use it much - aside from ways to make stats stupid high. But now we have the ability to dual wield spells - just seems a better change for me. And with attributes as we know them mostly gone, most breaking type spell use is not really there anymore, and most of what I could think of would be using two different spells at once... which dual wielding spells fixes.
User avatar
Sarah MacLeod
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:39 am

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 3:13 pm

Going by Beth history and what they've said, we already know.

No... we don't. End of discussion.
User avatar
Annick Charron
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:03 pm

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:25 pm

Yes, but you can't claim speed, acrobatics, unarmed are out - as we have not seen all the perk trees - it's unlikely, but until you have seen all the trees, you can't 100% make that assumption. There is no specific athletics or acrobatics skill, sure - but it does not mean speed and jumping being increaseable are out.

Spell making has been confirmed as not included. But they chose to do so for what I see as a valid reason "taking the magic out of magic by making it numbers on a spreadsheet" - sure, I didn't use it much - aside from ways to make stats stupid high. But now we have the ability to dual wield spells - just seems a better change for me. And with attributes as we know them mostly gone, most breaking type spell use is not really there anymore, and most of what I could think of would be using two different spells at once... which dual wielding spells fixes.

They said there's no H2H perks. Spell making was the magic in magic.

No... we don't. End of discussion.

The vets know.
User avatar
Sami Blackburn
 
Posts: 3306
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:56 am

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 2:10 pm

As long as the features that were cut are justifiable or replaced by something better I couldn't care less but for Skyrim such doesn't seem to be the case. Right now Skyrim is more of a FAST action Game instead of a Role playing game trying to attract more of the masses that love Fast games expansion is fine but I don't want to feel like I am playing COD in Skyrim from the videos alone I do, several things have been cut because those fast action gamers do not like it or wouldn't even mess with it. More content the better for a game like Skyrim that cannot be denied being the one of the few open world RPGs out there my exception is to live up to its name as an RPG.

So general view its Bethesda is more concerned about money more then ever, if they do not HAVE to do it they won't for that %30 of the fan base that has the ability to add or fix what they did not are lucky I guess you can say but too bad for everyone else.
User avatar
Joanne
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 4:31 pm

They said there's no H2H perks. Spell making was the magic in magic.

Dual wielding spells will in itself, be spellmaking, since you can combine effects.
User avatar
Albert Wesker
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:17 pm

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 3:23 pm

Dual wielding spells will in itself, be spellmaking, since you can combine effects.

No, thats in no way spell creation.
User avatar
NEGRO
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 12:14 am

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:00 pm

No, thats in no way spell creation.

It's virtually the same thing...
User avatar
Tessa Mullins
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:17 am

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 10:58 am

I'm usually pretty optimistic about this stuff... For instance, cutting classes and attributes makes sense and I'm glad it's in... However, when you cut things that people really enjoy (I.E. the arena), that makes very little sense and I think people have the right to complain about such.
User avatar
Noraima Vega
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:28 am

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 2:57 pm

It's virtually the same thing...

No, its not the same thing. Its not even similer really. Fact.
User avatar
Lory Da Costa
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 12:30 pm

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:44 pm

No... we don't. End of discussion.

He's got a point, granted Todd is dying down the hype trying to avoid another radiant AI situation, we still don't know what's for show and what isn't. The Dragons may not be all what they're dressed up to be, as a wise man (turned heretic) said "hope is the first step on the road to disappointment" we need to stop getting so hyped.
User avatar
Joie Perez
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:25 pm

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:14 pm

Dual wielding spells will in itself, be spellmaking, since you can combine effects.


No it's not. With just dual wielding I can't make most of my spells that I used, such as Northern Winds. Burden enemy, feather me, and deal low ice damage over a long period of time.
User avatar
Jerry Jr. Ortiz
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:39 pm

Post » Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:11 am

As long as the features that were cut are justifiable or replaced by something better I couldn't care less but for Skyrim such doesn't seem to be the case. Right now Skyrim is more of a FAST action Game instead of a Role playing game trying to attract more of the masses that love Fast games expansion is fine but I don't want to feel like I am playing COD in Skyrim from the videos alone I do, several things have been cut because those fast action gamers do not like it or wouldn't even mess with it. More content the better for a game like Skyrim that cannot be denied being the one of the few open world RPGs out there my exception is to live up to its name as an RPG.

So general view its Bethesda is more concerned about money more then ever, if they do not HAVE to do it they won't for that %30 of the fan base that has the ability to add or fix what they did not are lucky I guess you can say but too bad for everyone else.

What are these features that make the game a fast action game, more of an actin game than Morrowind or Oblivion?

The lack of attributes? How so? The skills are not enough? Or perks just sound too CoD?
No spellmaking? Never stopped the other millions of RPGs without this.

Don't we have cities, crafting, dialog, levels, quests, an open free world?

It's funny how it's always about blaming the "other people" and it's always about money...
User avatar
Chloe Mayo
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:59 pm

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 7:20 pm

Well you're the minority, so Bethesda doesn't care.

(Sorry if this comes across as rude, I don't for mean it to)


And that's why I'm pissed. They should care in a game where they claim to allow you to play however you want.
User avatar
Adam
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:56 pm

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 10:16 pm

@Riakon

Never tell someone they don't have the right to complain. Someone who can't tolerate complaints is a person who fears change. Now, I agree with you, there is CONSTRUCTIVE criticism (which can be negative, but is conveyed maturely) That is what we want. But we don't want/need "This game svcks (and no reasoning behind it)."

You might think that the removal of something people enjoyed in a previous game is the natural order, but in actuality, one of the reasons why many follow up titles to the original fail is because they took out too many core concepts from the original that helped make the game what it was.

Look at Splinter Cell (and any other Ubisoft title for that matter) In SC:CT, considered by many to be the best of the series, the game was all about stealth and shadows. The game cornered the "Stealth Action" genre. Then with the 4th version, Double Agent, they moved completely away from that. The game failed MISERABLY. Even Conviction, the 5th iteration, that did not move back to Stealth and light/shadow, didn't do as well respectively.

You have to be careful if you take out things that people enjoy. Beth might be doing so though to attract more casual gamers at the sake of upsetting more hardcoe vets of the series.


Just to make something clear I never said people didn't have the right to complain, I was only stating the complaint threads were getting out of hand. And yes mechanics have been removed, but there are so many unknowns about Skyrim. We can only make assumptions on what we do know, not what we don't know and from what I gather what we don't know severely outweighs what we do know about Skyrim. The fact is Bethesda isn't going to tell us everything about the game. If they reveal too much we have nothing to be surprised about.
User avatar
lolli
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:42 am

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:36 pm

And that's why I'm pissed. They should care in a game where they claim to allow you to play however you want.

Not to mention, if they only listened to the majority, we'd have a linear action adventure game, and no ES. Which is basically saying, if they removed every feature that this person, or that person never used, we'd no longer have an ES.
User avatar
Michael Korkia
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:58 pm

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 10:17 am

Just to make something clear I never said people didn't have the right to complain, I was only stating the complaint threads were getting out of hand. And yes mechanics have been removed, but there are so many unknowns about Skyrim. We can only make assumptions on what we do know, not what we don't know and from what I gather what we don't know severely outweighs what we do know about Skyrim. The fact is Bethesda isn't going to tell us everything about the game. If they reveal too much we have nothing to be surprised about.

Assumptions help us pass the time.

...
..
.

Oh God, there's still so much time left...
User avatar
Miranda Taylor
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:39 pm

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:01 pm

Assumptions help us pass the time.

...
..
.

Oh God, there's still so much time left...


There lies the problem. We still have to wait so long. Damn. Also I love when someone posts a reasonable post that gets passed over because of an argument. *cough*mine*cough*
User avatar
Alan Cutler
 
Posts: 3163
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 9:59 am

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 1:08 pm

Am I not alound to want?
User avatar
Carys
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:15 pm

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 2:58 pm

No it's not. With just dual wielding I can't make most of my spells that I used, such as Northern Winds. Burden enemy, feather me, and deal low ice damage over a long period of time.

I guarantee they have all those spells in there.
User avatar
Damian Parsons
 
Posts: 3375
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:48 am

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 7:23 pm

I guarantee they have all those spells in there.

I guarantee they dont have spells we think up. Beth cant read minds.
User avatar
noa zarfati
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:54 am

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:12 pm

I guarantee they dont. Beth cant read minds.

I meant all of those effects. Plus, they will have some specialized spells like that (you know with multiple effects).
User avatar
Nathan Barker
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 5:55 am

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 4:52 pm

I guarantee they have all those spells in there.


They have all the spells in the game, yes. The problem comes when...you see, there are three effects in my spell but I only have two hands to dual wield with.
User avatar
Kim Kay
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:45 am

Post » Thu Aug 25, 2011 10:14 pm

I think complaining about what you want in a game, or from something being cut is completely acceptable. I do it constantly with Skyrim.

For everyone saying, "Stop complaining no one is making you buy the game" etc. Think of this situation for the new Battlefield 3 (I know its a different game, but it proves my point): With Battlefield 3 there are many concerns about the consoles getting screwed with only 24 players per game, and the PC getting full 64 per game. When asked why this was, the devs and producers told the press that the PC players were COMPLAINING about the lack of attention the PC community was getting in previous Battlefield installments (ie. Battlefield bad company 1 and 2). They also mentioned, "We have not heard any complaints from the console community." You can look at any aticle on the web, just search google, for clarification. I will not post any specifics because its literally spammed all over the net.

My point being, that complaining is acceptable and so maybe we can be heard, and or the next instillation of TES after Skyrim will include what we hold dear to us. So complaining should be praised. If you still think complaining is a waste of time, go tell that to the console community of the upcoming Battlefield 3 game and see what they will do to you. Warning ahead of time, you might get MASSIVELY flammed :cryvaultboy:
User avatar
stacy hamilton
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:03 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim