This is a split off from the "Personalities you avoid" thread. Let's talk about cynicism and optimism. I'll make no pretense, I take a dim view of human nature. You can guess which side I'll be arguing. So, the primary topic here is "Are you a cynic, an optimist, or a pessimist and why?"
Cynicism is reviled in our modern rhetoric, as we see those who defraud others, who lie to get into public office, or who simply see the world as black and sit on the couch as cynical. And yet, all cynicism really is is a distrust of people's "charitable" motives. The Cynic expects that someone will attempt to defraud him under the guise of "kindness", the cynic listens to optimistic rhetoric about change and improvement and rather than accepting it at face value, asks "What does the speaker get out of this change?". The cynic hopes for the best and expects the worst, with an emphasis on the latter. Traditionally, Cynics derived their name from a Hellenic school of thought that defied convention and ideology in an attempt to see through to the truth of things. The Cynic school promoted asceticism, in the sense that belongings are essentially meaningless. Their defiance of convention could be taken a little too far, however. Diogenes, one of the founders of the school, is believed to have engaged in public mastvrbation. However, at it's core, the idea behind cynicism is that humans are basically selfishly motivated, and things like ideology and organizations are typically satisfying a need of the people who drive them. To put it in modern terms, if a candidate promises to put a chicken in every pot, the optimist sets the table, the pessimist doesn't think there are enough chickens, and the cynic is the one checking to see if this guy owns any stock in Perdue.