Daedra and CHIM

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 5:45 pm

What are the Daedric Princes relation to CHIM? In the 36 Lessons of Vivec, Molag Bal taught Vivec CHIM, and in the Trial Azura becomes frightened when she realizes that Vivec has CHIM, which would mean that she has at least basic knowledge about it. Furthermore, the Commentaries on the Mysterium Xarxes mentions CHIM, presumably meaning that Mehrunes Dagon knows about it, as he wrote the Mysterium Xarxes which Mankar merely translated and interpreted. The Psijiic Endeavour, related to CHIM, was based on the teachings of Azura, Boethiah and Mephala. So, this means that plenty of Daedra know 'bout it. I assume Hermaeus Mora knows too, due to his omniscience, and Sheogorath does (Or did, depending on your interpretation of CoC's apotheosis) if you ascribe to the "player characters have CHIM" theory. So, what is the deal with Daedra and CHIM? They seem pretty related to it.
User avatar
Alexander Horton
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:19 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:27 pm

Chaos is not held by barriers, unlike stasis. To see beyond one's holdings is elementary to the children of the padomaic, my dear SL.
User avatar
Big Homie
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:31 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 2:00 am

Some, if not all, et'ada knows it, but are not obsessed with it as Lorkhan was.

http://www.imperial-library.info/content/vehks-teaching


What are the spokes of the Wheel?

For ages the etada grew and shaped and destroyed each other and destroyed each other’s creations. Some were like Lorkhan and discovered the void outside of the Aurbis, though if some saw the Tower I do not know, but I know that, if they did, none held it in such high esteem. In any case, some of those that did see the void created its like inside the Aurbis, but each of these smaller voids sought each other out. Void shall follow void; the etada called it Oblivion. What was left of the Aurbis was solid change, otherwise known as magic. The etada called this Aetherius.


Lorkhan wanted to go back into first brush but still retain individuality, while it seems that most et'ada are content with what they have.
User avatar
Tom
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:39 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 4:49 pm

Rephrase your question and the answer becomes obvious: what does being a Prince have to do with Royalty?
User avatar
Mr. Ray
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 8:08 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 7:28 pm

Rephrase your question and the answer becomes obvious: what does being a Prince have to do with Royalty?
Mind blown.
User avatar
Chris BEvan
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 4:40 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 1:59 pm

Rephrase your question and the answer becomes obvious: what does being a Prince have to do with Royalty?

I'm with SL on this one, (mind-blown,) but I have a (slightly tangential) question: Following the On Boethiah's Summoning Day letters, and the point of the tribunal supplanting their anticipations before their time, does this mean that Vivec, through his actions,may have -prevented- Almalexia and Sotha Sil from achieving CHIM (and thereby becoming the Princes of the next Kalpa?) or that, in their effort to ensure their own existence, he was the only tribune to succeed?
User avatar
Philip Lyon
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:08 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 12:48 am

Mind blown.

he means that the Daedra (Aedra too) all know about CHIM because they are of CHIM, just like Princes obviously know about royalty, because they are of royalty. The one is the product of the other, in a way. I'm guessing that Azura was afraid of Vivec who knew CHIM because that put them on equal footing.
User avatar
Oyuki Manson Lavey
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:47 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 10:20 pm

So what happens when two CHIM guys fight? Is it even possible?
User avatar
SUck MYdIck
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:43 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 2:28 pm

So what happens when two CHIM guys fight? Is it even possible?

There's a very popular Brad Pitt/Edward Norton movie about just that.
User avatar
Alexis Acevedo
 
Posts: 3330
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:58 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 2:30 pm

So what happens when two CHIM guys fight? Is it even possible?
Probably...the Tribune did fight Mehrunes Dagon back in the day, and I'm guessing that he knew CHIM. I have no idea how a battle like that would play out though, but it'd probably look pretty sweet.
User avatar
Laura Simmonds
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:27 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 9:39 pm

Probably...the Tribune did fight Mehrunes Dagon back in the day, and I'm guessing that he knew CHIM. I have no idea how a battle like that would play out though, but it'd probably look pretty sweet.

Knowing CHIM and having it are two different things. My knowledge of Dagon's relation to CHIM and his actual relation to CHIM are two different things.

If Dagon had CHIM, then he would realize that pure destruction is worthless, because of everything being the Godhead, who would just dream up something new or wake up. Or maybe that's just what he wants. Or maybe I have a major splitting headache. Who can tell?
User avatar
marie breen
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:50 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 6:57 pm

Or maybe that's just what he wants. Or maybe I have a major splitting headache. Who can tell?

That headache is Dagon achieving CHIM.
User avatar
Jessica Thomson
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:10 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 3:20 pm

That headache is Dagon achieving CHIM.

Dagon is the Godhead's suicidal impulses. Godhead should go to therapy when it wakes up.
User avatar
Danny Warner
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:26 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 4:08 am

Dagon is the Godhead's suicidal impulses. Godhead should go to therapy when it wakes up.

Molag Bal is his inherent masochistic fetishes.
User avatar
Vickytoria Vasquez
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:06 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:28 pm

Molag Bal is his inherent masochistic fetishes.

That could also be said of Boethiah, frankly. Sado-masochistic, specifically.

And Malacath is the Godhead's quiet fetish for excrement and humiliation, of which it is greatly ashamed.
User avatar
Gavin boyce
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:19 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:05 pm

That could also be said of Boethiah, frankly. Sado-masochistic, specifically.

And Malacath is the Godhead's quiet fetish for excrement and humiliation, of which it is greatly ashamed.

Vivec is the Godhead's transgenderism.
User avatar
Colton Idonthavealastna
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:13 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:44 pm

Vivec is the Godhead's transgenderism.

Vivec is the ultimate-and-ultimately-kinky response of the Godhead to the stimulus "Go [NUMINIT] Yourself."
User avatar
Krista Belle Davis
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:00 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 10:34 pm

Akatosh is the Godhead's frustration at having to follow all these [censored] schedules, it just wants to go and do things, but no! This is at this time, that is at that time, everything revolves around the clock and it hates that.
User avatar
Matt Bigelow
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 6:36 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:43 pm

Akatosh is the Godhead's frustration at having to follow all these [censored] schedules, it just wants to go and do things, but no! This is at this time, that is at that time, everything revolves around the clock and it hates that.

Who is Magnus, Zenithar, Jyggalag, Dagoth Ur and Stendarr then?
User avatar
Rob Davidson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:52 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:57 pm

Magnus the the Godhead mind[vehk]ing himself.

Mephala is the Godhead as a murderer. Kills possibilities and realities! :D

Herma Mora is the Godhead's wish to [vehk] and get [vehk'd] by a tentacle monster, thus Herma Mora looks like one. Damned fetishes.
User avatar
Rachel Tyson
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:42 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 2:41 am

Who is Magnus, Zenithar, Jyggalag, Dagoth Ur and Stendarr then?
Jyggalag is the part of the godhead that thinks: Boy, everything would just be all fine and dandy and orderly if I were to go on that murderous rampage.
User avatar
Dalia
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:29 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 12:17 pm

Who is Magnus, Zenithar, Jyggalag, Dagoth Ur and Stendarr then?

And Peryite?
User avatar
Chris Duncan
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:31 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:20 pm

Chaos is not held by barriers, unlike stasis. To see beyond one's holdings is elementary to the children of the padomaic, my dear SL.

Perhaps, though there are certain limits. Chaos does not tend to zero-sum. It is reliably, even predictably DESTRUCTIVE, and so inherently self-limiting. Unlike stasis, which simply is, and in fact above a certain threshold, tends to be CONSTRUCTIVE, because of WHAT is, and thus may choose to be, and to become, which is contrary to certain popular assumptions about an idle mind, though stasis does not necessarily imply static in as much as it can also be state.

Certainly to see beyond one's holdings in the sense of self-identity is essential to ascend beyond mere occupation and unfocused impulse, being derived and experienced internally, external merely serves as circumstance, for the sake of appearances, or personal taste, perhaps, and a means to the end result of our intent to become something greater, by more than merely multiplying quantity but also, for improving QUALITY of being.

But in the sense of say the ABSENCE of holdings, even of essential, the musings of the greedy man can be more difficult to discern. Why should we be made subject, we may ask ourselves, to such a wanton waste of precious altruism, love, and creativity? Perhaps it is the inverse of the test? Vanity in attachment to entitlement as much as ownership?

Or, divines forbid, perhaps we have come to consider intellectual work alone without some immediate and quantifiable product to be akin to "laziness," in which case we need not blind ourselves with clarity to be lobotomized, for we have already cut out our own heart and soul, as it is absolutely possible for the absence of enough of what is in abundance externally to become exclusive to experience within of essential self-expression and thus, emergence.

Unless one learns to live hypothetically, but then who are we fooling? How can we ever be scientists, and if science is in our nature, how can we ever be sane?

And Peryite?

Peryite represents the Godheads latent self-doubt, manifest in the soon-forgotten mortal plane, which was initially populated exclusively by lawyers.
User avatar
Chris Jones
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 3:11 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 3:08 am

Perhaps, though there are certain limits. Chaos does not tend to zero-sum. It is reliably, even predictably DESTRUCTIVE, and so inherently self-limiting. Unlike stasis, which simply is, and in fact above a certain threshold, tends to be CONSTRUCTIVE, because of WHAT is, and thus may choose to be, and to become, which is contrary to certain popular assumptions about an idle mind, though stasis does not necessarily imply static in as much as it can also be state.

Certainly to see beyond one's holdings in the sense of self-identity is essential to ascend beyond mere occupation and unfocused impulse, being derived and experienced internally, external merely serves as circumstance, for the sake of appearances, or personal taste, perhaps, and a means to the end result of our intent to become something greater, by more than merely multiplying quantity but also, for improving QUALITY of being.

But in the sense of say the ABSENCE of holdings, even of essential, the musings of the greedy man can be more difficult to discern. Why should we be made subject, we may ask ourselves, to such a wanton waste of precious altruism, love, and creativity? Perhaps it is the inverse of the test? Vanity in attachment to entitlement as much as ownership?

Or, divines forbid, perhaps we have come to consider intellectual work alone without some immediate and quantifiable product to be akin to "laziness," in which case we need not blind ourselves with clarity to be lobotomized, for we have already cut out our own heart and soul, as it is absolutely possible for the absence of enough of what is in abundance externally to become exclusive to experience within of essential self-expression and thus, emergence.

Unless one learns to live hypothetically, but then who are we fooling? How can we ever be scientists, and if science is in our nature, how can we ever be sane?

That is an extremely intelligent reply that is rare among these forums.
I'll digest and review it later, but I'm glad to see someone not summarising complex ideas within metaphorical language.
Too common I see followers of Micheal Kirkbride prefer the use of inaudible paved words to create short poetic sentences.
User avatar
Crystal Clarke
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:55 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:14 pm

Perhaps, though there are certain limits. Chaos does not tend to zero-sum. It is reliably, even predictably DESTRUCTIVE, and so inherently self-limiting. Unlike stasis, which simply is, and in fact above a certain threshold, tends to be CONSTRUCTIVE, because of WHAT is, and thus may choose to be, and to become, which is contrary to certain popular assumptions about an idle mind, though stasis does not necessarily imply static in as much as it can also be state.

But it is Sithis who instigates both creation and destruction.

How can Stasis be creative? Above a certain threshold of what? "Choice" and "becoming" are both found in the realm of Sithis.
User avatar
Catherine N
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:58 pm

Next

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion