I find it endlesly amusing that his name sounds like hipocrasy
But could he have invented it if someone had not already domesticated a crop or an animal?
But could he have invented it if someone had not already domesticated a crop or an animal?
It's more of the singular importance of the thing. The plow itself is an invention that brought several different ideas together: you had the problem of turning over enough land so that you could plant enough crops to get a decent yield in poor soils, and a person (or even a family) wasn't enough to do the job. Of course we needed domestication of plants and animals first, but without the plow, civilisation at the scale we know today would be impossible.