http://www.imperial-library.info/obscure_text/vehk_teaching.shtml#7.
I'm not entirely sure, but I think 1999 is equating the idea of what those with CHIM do to what http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Wukong did, who was the Monkey King in Journey to the West.
If it's not that...then I have no earthly idea.
Nice one 946000 - MK loves that Monkey-King movie thing right? Try also looking at MK's postys - he keeps referring to the monkeys in the west. Why?
Well I've often thought he might be referring to humans and the Empire - but he could also have Arteum in mind - assuming that there is a Vivec/Lorkhan link? And assuming that a center of Mer opposition to Lorkhan is to be found in Arteum - and how could there not be given that Arteum draws it's members from all over Tamriel? And yes, I hope you noted that there is one known link for sure - time and again Vivec filled himself up with Lorkhan's power - from Lorkhan's very own Living Heart. It aint no ardinary heart is it? It could not still be alive if it was. So maybe you should ask exactly what the nature of that power is ... can a God's Heart think? Can a God's Heart corrupt? Presumably you will allow that in English and all the Latin languages the Heart of a person is more than just another piece of flesh.
Even if they started out as separate and different entities Lorkhan and Vivec are now directly and inextricably linked through the Heart's Blood/power.
Why - there is a lot of Lore re Vivec's achievement of Godhead - he wrote most of it himself, so do you believe it?
Well if achieving Godhead makes reality always so - then Lorkhan and Vivec have always been linked ... does it not follow? So then you must also ask what are the futher links between Vivec and Lorkhan that predate the Tribunal's use/abuse of the Heart - they must exist if what occurred at the Heart created a timeless 'addition' to reality - the paradoxical emergence of a god who had then always been. You might wonder if you can trust Vivec's account as he has 'replaced' Mephala as the 'Lord' of lies, plots and murder? Well fair enough - please do specualte. But you also have to consider the other members of the Tribunal and Dagoth Ur.
What would really anger the liar and murderer Vivec about Azura's actions? Not something that happened to someone else for sure - we are talking about a murderer and a thief who killed his wife-to-be's husband so that he could steal a God's power. But is there anything more insulting or demeaning to a God than to deny that a God's self is himself and has a proper place in the scheme of things? For once that link between Vivec and Lorkhan had been established it had existed forever and they were one ... as Vivec was one with the other members of the Tribunal through the Heart - and also one with Dagoth Ur! But that does not explain Vivec's apparent primacy in his relationship to the other members of the Tribunal.
As noted in other threads it would appear that those linked through the Heart do not die ... wonder why? Maybe because you would have to kill them all at the same time, and kill the Heart itself for them all to die. A powerful statement of the Nature of the Heart. I believe certain of the mechanics of that continued exisence are to be found in the tomes in The Imperial Library - you might search there or in the other related threads here.
So you can wonder what was different between the connection that Vivec had to the Heart (he kept coming back - he has written of having experienced death and coming back) but it appears as though Sotha-sil and Almalexia did not or could not. So how was Vivec different? What enabled him to master CHIMp? Obviously that has to be something major - would someone please give me a reason why a mere thief (class mastery normally of Illusion) was able to master such a thing (Metaphysics) where the devoted Scholar and God Sotha-sil (PSYJIIC) was not? I have offered one idea in my previous post. It seems there was more to the link between Lorkhan and Vivec than has been noted.
Then you have the statue in that Vile Grotto with the Hole in its Heart ... that's Lorkhan (son of Sithis? yups) but presumably Vivec is now accepted as being inextricably linked to Lorkhan - does it matter to you whether Lorkhan has subsumed Vivec or if Vivec has subsumed Lorkhan? Does the duality of Vivec's appearance represent the balance in Vivec of a composite of Lorkhan in one half and Vivec in the other?
By-the-by, how could Sithis not have existed/exist if he had a son called Lorkhan?
All this was inherent in my previous posts and you know the relevant Lore proweler. How could you not see the connections? But now as you have requested you have it in more detail.
Ooops - regarding conspiracies and the Imperial half of the balance
proweler Posted Jan 30 2009, 03:41 PM
QUOTE (PatchyPegleg @ Jan 30 2009, 07:43 PM)
Wow, this just got really really deep. 1999 just may have got something here, hopefully you are right and it's not some book writer for Bethesda writing out whatever he feels like.
He's more known for seeing a conspiracy in everything then anything else. This one can be summed up as "they must be related because they all use the same philosophical concept and act the same generic acts!".
Try the following specifics from your own link no less:
It is more difficult to date the Era when the Morag Tong re-emerged as the Dark Brotherhood, especially as other guilds of assassins have sporadically appeared throughout the history of Tamriel. The first mention of the Dark Brotherhood that I have found is from the journals of the Blood Queen Arlimahera of Hegathe. She spoke of slaying her enemies by her own hand, or if necessary "with the help of the Night Mother and her Dark Brotherhood, the secret arsenal my family has employed since my grandfather's time." Arlimahera wrote this in 2E412, so one can surmise that the Dark Brotherhood had been in existence since at least 360 if her grandfather had truly made use of them.
If this Queen could use the DB, and her father and Grandfather etc, and openly published the fact - then does anyone really think that various Emperors have not used them when convenient? And we are all aware of how such developments regularly enter the game. Basically the game is full of things that you have to take for granted - but then you know that proweler. Why do you deny it when I post on the subject?
Don't bother to ask why would an Emperor do this? Ask how could an Emperor not do this? It is in the nature of Emperors to control all that is within their Empire and to add to their Empires - does that seem unrreasonable? Well that's the way it is, that is what Empire, for good or ill, is all about.
Conspiracy theory???? Just exactly what commentary on the ES political/religious scene is not based on or linked into conspiracy theories??? And umm, proweler, are you really saying that the fact that Mephala, known as the Anticipation of Vivec is also known as the mother of plots, escaped your notice - you know this perfectly well so please do not dissemble any further. That post was about conspiracies because the Deadric Prince of Conspiracies was involved. Would you be so kind as to come down from your ivory tower and explain why that is not a sensible line of discussion or commentary? I've been trying to add to the content of this thread. You still have not refuted anything specific re Lore ... it really would be nice if you actually had something specifiic and relevant about Lore to add here. This is not about you - this is about what you have been doing in this thread.
It does occur that you are trying to negate my contribution here without referring to any of it directly because there is something in that content that you are all too aware of and are uncomfortable with and do not want by any act of your own to lend it credence as it might then spawn another monster Apochrypha, another 'heresy' might take wing and 'have to be stamped out' - to quote your own words. Too bad. I love Lore and speculation. In ES they go hand in hand. If you want to play the Jygg then do so. I'm not a Jygg who will brook no deviation from the known course that I have predetermined. My belief is one should respect the real contributions and observations that others make, no matter who they are, and so I try to build on them for the sheer joy of it. I don't try to kill the butterfly and pin its wings to my board.
One more detail: I quote the reply to the OP: "Sithis is the start of the House, before him there was nothing." You might ask 'What House'?