Destroyed elderscrolls cities

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:10 pm

Sometimes people rebuild. Sometimes... well... look at Detroit -- and it didn't even get physically destroyed.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=932vpuCmfJM&feature=related

lol
User avatar
lucile
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:37 pm

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:08 pm

I would love to rebuild any destroyed cities, but the quests have to be huge because building a city is really just a lot of work! I don't mind if those quests are mods though, it would be cool however that in that case, like Zeopard already mentioned, that the mod gets a reference in the next game or that the developers officially make it canon.
User avatar
maria Dwyer
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:24 am

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:35 am

Even if the fires went out and there was no rebuilding - that would be ok. But a rebuild would be exellent
User avatar
Portions
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:47 am

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:42 pm

I voted no.

I'd love to see the cities being rebuilt, but it would be so much better if the cities were alive.

As in the people made their houses themselves, instead of relying on this one Kahjiit to pop by and find the Maguffin of Machina.
User avatar
Marie Maillos
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:23 am

If a city is meant to be destroyed in Skyrim then so be it. If you want to rebuild it you can always create a mod like they did with Kvatch.
User avatar
CSar L
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:36 pm

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:12 pm

If a city is meant to be destroyed in Skyrim then so be it. If you want to rebuild it you can always create a mod like they did with Kvatch.


Why would you want a city to be permanently inaccessible? I s'pose you enjoyed the smoldering wreck of Kvatch, never to go there again?

"blah blah blah get a mod to fix it"

No. Why should I have to rely on someone else to do the job BGS couldn't? Anyway, I have no doubt there will be recuperation of cities, especially after what they did with Kvatch, they wouldn't do it again.
User avatar
aisha jamil
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:54 am

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:05 pm

It double posted :(
User avatar
Darlene DIllow
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:34 am

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:33 am

If a city is meant to be destroyed in Skyrim then so be it. If you want to rebuild it you can always create a mod like they did with Kvatch.

Congratulations, your 8% of the population. I assume we go by majority rules so NO. Next time you want to go be a rebel then go somewhere else. This is a forum, no one cares. This is only three pages of post if you can't read a few of them to tell that what your saying is exactly the problem Bethesda has. Relying on us the community to fix our own problems. Then maybe you shouldn't of voted. It is simple concept and wouldn't take terribly long time to fix.
User avatar
Matt Fletcher
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:48 am

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:10 am

Congratulations, your 8% of the population. I assume we go by majority rules so NO. Next time you want to go be a rebel then go somewhere else. This is a forum, no one cares. This is only three pages of post if you can't read a few of them to tell that what your saying is exactly the problem Bethesda has. Relying on us the community to fix our own problems. Then maybe you shouldn't of voted. It is simple concept and wouldn't take terribly long time to fix.


Whoa easy I'm not trying to start a flame war. I'm just saying if a city is scripted to be destroyed by a Dragon say Alduin then should it be rebuilt in the amount of gametime that the Dragonborn will have in Skyrim. With Kvatch it's unrealistic for it to be rebuilt during the Oblivion crisis because the empire is too busy defending the Imperial City and keeping Martin alive. Could Bethesda maybe include the option to rebuild a city in Skyrim, it's a possibilty but if it doesn't fit lore wise then no.
User avatar
Melanie Steinberg
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:25 pm

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:50 am

a fine example of rebuilding is hiroshima (and whatever that other city was called)

yes, towns should be rebuilt in this game
User avatar
Marine x
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:54 am

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 5:29 pm

With Kvatch it's unrealistic for it to be rebuilt during the Oblivion crisis because the empire is too busy defending the Imperial City and keeping Martin alive.


Imperials didn't do [censored], yo.

They sent half a battalion to Kvatch and then used their mind powers to stop me stealing stuff in the city.
User avatar
Trevi
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:26 pm

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 7:58 pm

Whoa easy I'm not trying to start a flame war. I'm just saying if a city is scripted to be destroyed by a Dragon say Alduin then should it be rebuilt in the amount of gametime that the Dragonborn will have in Skyrim. With Kvatch it's unrealistic for it to be rebuilt during the Oblivion crisis because the empire is too busy defending the Imperial City and keeping Martin alive. Could Bethesda maybe include the option to rebuild a city in Skyrim, it's a possibilty but if it doesn't fit lore wise then no.

What about the people sitting in that tiny little village near kavatch? They said "We can rebuild it." You never read the post so it pissed me off. People had already said that they intended to make kavatch a quest but time constraints limited them. It would make perfect sense for people to automatically after the recuperate to want to re build there home so they can have some where somewhat safe to stay. Unless your telling me you would rather remain homeless which I think is bs. If that is your logic as I was saying your alone.
User avatar
Jennifer Munroe
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:57 am

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:32 am

What about the people sitting in that tiny little village near kavatch? They said "We can rebuild it." You never read the post so it pissed me off. People had already said that they intended to make kavatch a quest but time constraints limited them. It would make perfect sense for people to automatically after the recuperate to want to re build there home so they can have some where somewhat safe to stay. Unless your telling me you would rather remain homeless which I think is bs. If that is your logic as I was saying your alone.


Half a dozen people can't rebuild a city like Kvatch. It would take at least one to two years if not longer game time to rebuild it. Now if you were able to get other people from say Anvil, Skingrad, Chorrol and maybe possibly Hammerfell and Valenwood then yeah you might be able to build it back up in a month or two but the events of the Oblivion crisis may prevent that from happening.
User avatar
Arrogant SId
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:39 am

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:04 pm

No it would take them a long time till the events were over right?
User avatar
brandon frier
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:47 pm

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:27 pm

Would like to see a few minor cities(not settlements, cities) being destroyed and reconstructed, as well as maybe scars on some of the bigger cities that could be rebuilt with little or no help of the player. After all the world doesn't completely revolve around us.
User avatar
KiiSsez jdgaf Benzler
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:10 am

Post » Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:37 am

If any city gets destryed I would like the option to rebuild it it, I kind of felt cheated because I could not rebuild Kvatch and I really wanted to rebuild that city but never got the chance to.
User avatar
Farrah Lee
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:32 pm

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:27 am

That would be fun!
The aspect of rebuilding Rome in Assassin's Creed Brotherhood was a cool thing to implement.
User avatar
Sammygirl
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:15 pm

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:48 am

Would like to see a few minor cities(not settlements, cities) being destroyed and reconstructed, as well as maybe scars on some of the bigger cities that could be rebuilt with little or no help of the player. After all the world doesn't completely revolve around us.

That statement is a bit controversial.
User avatar
Sarah Knight
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:02 am

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:01 pm

yes i was pretty dissapointed when kvatch was never rebuilt the mods that rebuilt it looked amazing but i never played oblivion on the computer
User avatar
Justin
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:32 am

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:33 pm

Because the twin towers are a memorial to the people who died that day and it will cost a huge amount of money?

Actually because they were aging badly, the tenants were moving out (both partly due to the WTC bombings), and the planes solved the issue of what to do with them. As bad as it sounds, the owner wasn't all sad.

As for building back destroyed cities, I think that would be pretty cool.
User avatar
luis dejesus
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:40 am

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:00 pm

Yes please I'll like to rebuild a city. I was so bummed to hear there had been a questline/faction for Kvatch/the Elder Council in Oblivion but it had been cut. I wish they'd gone back and released it as DLC. :(
User avatar
Harry Hearing
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:19 am

Post » Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:16 am

It would be fun to be have a hand in some way in rebuilding.

And geesh, if people didn't rebuild things like in Oblivion, soon enough in TES:11 (Akavir? o:) Tamriel would be completely ruined! hurhur.
User avatar
Mistress trades Melissa
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:28 pm

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:11 pm

If a city is to be ruined, it would be interesting if it was slowly rebuilt over time, according to the game's calendar (obviously sped up so that we don't have to go to prison repeatedly just to see a city rebuilt).

But what would be particularly interesting would be if the city were not exactly the same after being rebuilt. Perhaps have people living amongst the ruins rather than some absurd "it never happened" situation.
User avatar
Maddy Paul
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:43 pm

If a city is to be ruined, it would be interesting if it was slowly rebuilt over time, according to the game's calendar (obviously sped up so that we don't have to go to prison repeatedly just to see a city rebuilt).

But what would be particularly interesting would be if the city were not exactly the same after being rebuilt. Perhaps have people living amongst the ruins rather than some absurd "it never happened" situation.

Actually you just reminded me of the situation of Rome. The ruins are still there they built around them and it's a tourist attraction. But need more support before I put that in. I already have the maybe it's not the same bit though. I would hate if people didn't reference it or at least act arrogant because of how they bounced back lol.
User avatar
Kat Stewart
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:30 am

Post » Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:04 pm

Good thread. I hope there is rebuilding involved, but I also want to see permanent marks of the events that came to pass, like a specific bulding that was left in ruins on purpose, to remind people or what happened for example.
User avatar
Jeff Turner
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:35 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim