Constructive criticism is not defined by destructive hatred. Your counterpoint must be more articulate than that, right?
Your counterpoint must be a bit more articulate than simple slander, no? Constructive criticism is most definitely not defined by YOU.
Your opinion about why this forum exists is your own. And it is exactly that, an opinion. Your opinion about forums is based on an abstract form of reality. In fact, this forum exists for other reasons than you mention (because it's expected and because it's informational).
No, it's not based on an abstract form of reality. It's based on the reality of Bethesda being a business as opposed to a welfare organisation.
Venting.
Entertainment.
Hype.
Socializing.
anolyzing.
There are likely other reasons that the forum is so vibrant with activity.
Way to miss the point - which was not "reasons that the forum is so vibrant with activity" but "reasons for this forum to exist". All of what you list is part of "It's expected" - it's expected of a game company in the 21st century to provide a forum in which people can do all that.
And that's the end of the story. Your venting doesn't pay the bills.
I'm not sure why someone could believe that this forum (or most other gaming forums) is restricted to "expectation" and "informational."
Well, then let me give you a reason why someone would believe that: Because believe it or not, gaming forums are marketing tools. That's what they exist for. They are not holy manna dropped from the heavens. They cost real money to create and maintain, and as such, there has to be some form of return on that investment.The forum exists because it helps Bethesda running their business profitably. Not to provide you with your personal platform.
One thing that is obvious, you have not offered constructive criticism and have instead attempted to skew one other posters post. Which I found to be legitimate and normal.
One thing that is obvious is that you make every effort to prove correct what I said. The mere fact that you deny someone providing constructive criticism doesn't make it factual. And the mere fact that you found a post to be legitimate and normal doesn't mean that criticism of it is not warranted.
That is the fundamental problem in this forum: ANY form of criticism will immediately be labeled destructive and those voicing it "haters" . We've even had the situation in some threads of people providing plenty of alternative suggestions only to be accused of "destructive criticism" and being accused of not providing any solutions whatsoever - when the evidence to the contrary was within the same thread.
And thanks for providing one more piece of evidence for that.