DLC Expansions

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 12:51 am

I'd like to see something with the aliens in it just for closure and that s all. While some may think aliens have no place in the Fallout Universe, they're forgetting that UFO sightings, hoaxes and even much of movies B-rated and otherwise were obsessed with aliens, just like how the pop culture of the post-war era also fancied the idea of having nuclear powered vehicles, food with a long shelf life and personal robots.

User avatar
Rachel Briere
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 9:09 am

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 1:50 am


Maybe add the ability to ride robots then.

User avatar
Liv Brown
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:44 pm

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 8:43 am



Bethesda is actually a rather small company, not tiny, but they are nowhere near as big as some other companies



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethesda_Game_Studios#Games_developed



The above link clearly shows that they don't make many games, but when they do, they are absolutely huge, just because one company does something doesn't mean another will.



And what does support have to do with DLC? You will probably get 5 give or take, end of story.






p.s. And please, if you are going to respond, i don't want an essay.



p.p.s. No, seriously, i am asking nicely

User avatar
James Shaw
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 11:23 pm

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:48 am

Nah, it was the whole world. Us and china may have been at war, but everyone with capabilities launched everything they had.
User avatar
Sheila Esmailka
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:31 am

Post » Mon Feb 22, 2016 8:57 pm

I know Bethesda Game Studios is a small video game development company.



So Is VALVe basically they have 300 employees I think and they still work on developing and updating their twelve year old video game engine and video games.

User avatar
Far'ed K.G.h.m
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:03 pm

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 8:17 am



Yes, and Valve haven't made (or published, for that matter) a single game since CS:GO in 2012.

User avatar
David Chambers
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 4:30 am

Post » Mon Feb 22, 2016 11:27 pm

That's because they were busy developing Source Engine 2 since 2011.



Rumors are Left 4 Dead 3 and Half-Life 3 will be released for sale on Source Engine 2 either before 2016 ends or who knows when.



Dota 2 has been ported to Source Engine 2.



Either way it still stands I want to see Bethesda Game Studios support Fallout 4 until 2018 and every new video game developed by Bethesda Game Studios to have at least three years worth of support.



In my topic about Todd Howard he said Fallout 4 will get support in 2017 as well.



So we will most definitely get more Far Harbor sized expansion packs sold in 2017.



Not counting Dragonborn releasing for sale in 2012 for the Xbox 360, ZeniMax Media Inc., Bethesda Softworks, and Bethesda Game Studios released Dragonborn for sale in February5th, and February 12th, 2013 and fully stopped support in April 2013.



That was up to one year and five months of support, but that was because of the hardware limitations of the PlayStation 3 (PS3) and Xbox 360. Hopefully.

User avatar
Taylah Illies
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:13 am

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:53 am



Support =/= DLC



My life is the industry, i know how it works, how it ticks, support is nothing more than bug fixes and optimisations, DLC is extra content.



How can you not see this? I am actually beginning to think you are trolling.

User avatar
Ladymorphine
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 2:22 pm

Post » Mon Feb 22, 2016 10:15 pm

As I said support for patches and releasing DLC's and expansion packs for sale.

User avatar
James Rhead
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:32 am

Post » Mon Feb 22, 2016 11:00 pm

Have you bought the game yet, Ballowers? >.>

User avatar
Queen of Spades
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 12:06 pm

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:01 am


That sentence makes no sense.



Please, tell me, are you trolling?

User avatar
STEVI INQUE
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Mon Feb 22, 2016 9:17 pm

No, but the tweaked Survival Mode got me excited for Fallout 4 like when they first showed it off at their E3 2015 conference.



There's more I can say, but it would be going off topic too much which I think we already have?

User avatar
He got the
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 12:19 pm

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 9:28 am

Ok how can I make it more clear? Bethesda Game Studios should keep releasing patches by 2018 and developing DLC's and expansion packs to sell as well by 2018.



Sounds better?

User avatar
alyssa ALYSSA
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:36 pm

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 9:11 am


Yes, it sounds a million times better.




And you know they won't do that.

User avatar
Roanne Bardsley
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:57 am

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 4:53 am

What's this 2017 support Todd Howard talks about at his DICE 2016 interview then?



Only support Fallout 4 for five months into 2017 and then stop?

User avatar
Ernesto Salinas
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:19 pm

Post » Mon Feb 22, 2016 10:52 pm



SUPPORT < THIS, this means bug fixes, patches etc, not new DLC, that does not fall under the category of Support, i did an entire unit on the process companies go through in college, i know what i am talking about.




Arguing with you is impossible because you are either a troll or you are really that ignorant, so i am done, i think ignoring all your posts was one of my wisest decisions and i am going to go back to doing just that.

User avatar
HARDHEAD
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 5:49 am

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:58 am


if they do that that probably will svck devs from the next proyect most game dont give support to their games more that 2 year if that game dont have multiplayer.

User avatar
liz barnes
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:10 am

Post » Mon Feb 22, 2016 7:57 pm

I'm not even arguing I specifically said many times patches, DLC's, and expansion packs.

User avatar
rebecca moody
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:01 pm

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 8:17 am

Aaaanyway, one of the things I'd still really like to see is a new landmass where like 2/3rds of the locations on the map are workshop settlements, with just a short questline to take us there and get us acclimated. Then the purpose of the DLC is just to build the entire landmass as you see fit, and build your own world as it were. I'd love that.

User avatar
Heather beauchamp
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:05 pm

Post » Mon Feb 22, 2016 10:04 pm


That would be cool, perhaps larger prefabs and building blocks in general to make larger towns, maybe something along the lines of Megaton.

User avatar
Charles Weber
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:14 pm

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 3:33 am


Is there any proof of that? It is only known for certain that the United States has been devastated by the Great War since Fallout only deals with the United States. If the US and China bombed themselves to the stone age, then the rest of the countries would quarantine off China and the US. There is absolutely no reason to waste nukes on a country that is not warring against China and the US unless someone took control of all the nukes and decided to bomb everyone. Of course, that would mean the Great War was not caused by China or the US, but by some outside party which is merely a conspiracy theory. So places like Australia, Africa, and South America would be safe from nuclear attack, but they would still have to deal with the Fallout and the aftermath of the Resource Wars.

User avatar
Adam
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:56 pm

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 2:07 am

Canada, which Is what I was replying about, would be nuked, because it was America.


However. Proof of everyone launching? It's pretty widely accepted.

"In less than two hours, most of the planet was reduced to cinders."


Fallout 1 and two intro narration sets the stage for the whole game universe- and part of that is that most of the planet is destroyed- that it burned.


Excluding South America, Africa, and Australia would imply half of the world wouldn't be nuked. Which certainly isn't most in any definition. :)



It's a MAD scenario.
User avatar
James Wilson
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:51 pm

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:32 am

What I wanna know is if i can make robots like fisto

User avatar
Steeeph
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:28 am

Post » Mon Feb 22, 2016 7:29 pm


All we know is how the US and China fared and even then most of the planet was not reduced to cinders. In the Commonwealth, only two or three bombs actually hit. If most of the planet was reduced to cinders, then nothing would grow due to the soil losing its vitality and the only wastelanders would be Ghouls and Vault Dwellers. After the bombs dropped, there was looters a couple of days after the bombs dropped. If this was happening in a major American metropolitan, then other places would fare much better.



As far as Canada being hit, it was an annexed region that had Canadians continuously rebelling against the oppressive Americans. China would only target the US installations and leave Canadian cities alone.



As far as the United States is concerned, most of the planet was affected since it is the problem of local perspective. It is not like Americans could send an expedition to Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia to see how the rest of the planet fared. Personal survival takes precedence over seeing how everyone else is doing.

User avatar
Pants
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:34 am

Post » Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:26 am

This thread strangely reminds me of Civilization and people asking why Canada is not a civilization in the game. :P

User avatar
Emzy Baby!
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:02 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout 4