DLC in Mexico

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:10 pm

would you like a DLC down in Mexico
User avatar
(G-yen)
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:10 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:57 am

No, Mexico would probably look the same as it does now after a Nuclear Holocaust.
User avatar
Thema
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:36 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:58 pm

I wouldn't like to jump countries until I can explore the whole country it'd be weird jumping that distance.

As well as what the post before me said.
User avatar
Claire Vaux
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:56 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:16 pm

No. One reason: I doubt Obsidian will find competent voice actors. And I don't want people in Mexico speaking English most of the time.
User avatar
Andrea Pratt
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:49 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:36 am

Maybe rather see a full blown sequel or expansion in mexico.
Personaly I would go with Great Britain. Some history written for it already. And I would love a Fallout come Blitz motif.
With blimps, burnt out buildings and mutated pigeons.
User avatar
Rodney C
 
Posts: 3520
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:54 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:41 pm

Another DLC thread? The game isnt even out yet. No, that wouldnt be too fun IMO.
User avatar
Kayleigh Williams
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:41 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:15 am

I wouldn't like to jump countries until I can explore the whole country it'd be weird jumping that distance.

As well as what the post before me said.

but they arw really not that far away from each other and with fallout 3 you go up to alaska now canada that would be weird
User avatar
Elizabeth Falvey
 
Posts: 3347
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 1:37 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:03 am

huevos?

Only if they include the Mexican Hat Dance and competent voice-actors. Also, no, because Mexico is quite huge.
User avatar
Ann Church
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:41 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:06 am

Maybe rather see a full blown sequel or expansion in mexico.
Personaly I would go with Great Britain. Some history written for it already. And I would love a Fallout come Blitz motif.
With blimps, burnt out buildings and mutated pigeons.


Sounds good.

Deserts are nice, but Europe would be something new to see. For a DLC though, sure Mexico would work. (Europe being a new game disc).
User avatar
RObert loVes MOmmy
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:12 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:29 pm

but they arw really not that far away from each other and with fallout 3 you go up to alaska now canada that would be weird


Actually you were in a simulator :P it made sense idk I just feel like mexico would be a little blank.
User avatar
Jarrett Willis
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:01 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:38 am

Are there locations in Mexico, close to New Vegas that are worth a DLC? I would not mind seeing people from Mexico in New Vegas. To get to Mexico you have to go through Arizona or Southern California and there are alot of locations in Southern California I would like to see (See again). Also I would like to see Arizona before Mexico.
User avatar
Scott Clemmons
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 5:35 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:13 pm

but they arw really not that far away from each other and with fallout 3 you go up to alaska now canada that would be weird


:facepalm: Noob...

They are far away from each other. What do you think this is? Fantasy land? This is after the nuclear holocaust. There's no planes and even if there was one that worked you'll never find a million dollars laying around to be able to use it. And Alaska was a computer simulation.
User avatar
Joe Bonney
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:00 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:39 pm

And also I voted no. It would be useless and Mexico is already a POS. Besides, where in Fallout canon history has Mexico been of big importance? No where. Nobody cared about them. However, a DLC in Europe would make sense because it was destroyed during the Resource Wars (2052 - 2077) and went into a mode of chaos. Since then, nobody knew what happened to it...or it's opponent, the Middle East.
User avatar
JaNnatul Naimah
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:33 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:01 pm

And also I voted no. It would be useless and Mexico is already a POS. Besides, where in Fallout canon history has Mexico been of big importance? No where. Nobody cared about them. However, a DLC in Europe would make sense because it was destroyed during the Resource Wars (2052 - 2077) and went into a mode of chaos. Since then, nobody knew what happened to it...or it's opponent, the Middle East.


Europe and the Middle East would have been nuked to hell like the rest of the planet. The Resource Wars just means they would have been worce off then the rest of the world. Still would be interesting to see them. Could have some cool bunkers and even entire cities build underground during the Resource Wars. But a DLC? anything over the pond sould be it's own game.

I agree there is not much in Mexico (Close to New Vegas) worth a DLC (based on how we have no info about Mexico and South America), unless Obsidian and Beth can make one hell of a story. Maybe some new Empire based on the Aztecs moving North into the States.
User avatar
The Time Car
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:13 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:23 am

:facepalm: Noob...

They are far away from each other. What do you think this is? Fantasy land? This is after the nuclear holocaust. There's no planes and even if there was one that worked you'll never find a million dollars laying around to be able to use it. And Alaska was a computer simulation.

yes alaska was a computer simulation I know but mexico is in maybe from vegas at least a week or two away walking and did you hear of a train tracks would be their and as a fuel you could brun wood that woidn`t take long at all. by the way do you remember how you get to the pitt if their tracks then their has to be some at vegas and I will not lie the UK would be pretty cool.
User avatar
Carlos Vazquez
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:19 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:47 am

Europe and the Middle East would have been nuked to hell like the rest of the planet. The Resource Wars just means they would have been worce off then the rest of the world. Still would be interesting to see them. Could have some cool bunkers and even entire cities build underground during the Resource Wars. But a DLC? anything over the pond sould be it's own game.

I agree there is not much in Mexico (Close to New Vegas) worth a DLC (based on how we have no info about Mexico and South America), unless Obsidian and Beth can make one hell of a story. Maybe some new Empire based on the Aztecs moving North into the States.

A new aztec empire down their that I would PAY to see
User avatar
Dylan Markese
 
Posts: 3513
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:58 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:57 pm

A new aztec empire down their that I would PAY to see


Rip-off of Caesar's Legion? No thanks.
User avatar
FirDaus LOVe farhana
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:42 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:38 am

ok, heres my opinion, lol well mexico will be more of the same, , and why well, simple its gona be like something very close to a desert, and well ... the original fallout is in a damm desert, and i got bored of the desert, and trains stations, they all lokks the same, second reason is tha they have to look now for a place that its gota have snow yeah, we need a fallout that will have snow, but im very ok whit the idea of making a game in mexico, about mexico, yeah a gta5 in mexico or a fall out before the world ends, in mexicocuss im playing read dead redemption and mexico is soo much funn, so yeah a good rpg can be created in a basee of mexico, specially if the game has guns and daggers as wepons lol, mexicans have fire on theyr blood! :)
User avatar
Anthony Rand
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 5:02 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:34 am

Would there be a drug war?
User avatar
Jack
 
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 8:08 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:48 pm

Would there be a drug war?

it won`t be mexico with out one lol
User avatar
Jack Moves
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:44 am

I don't think DLC in Mexico would be very fun. Fallout is all about America. Mexico of the future would probably be about the same as it is now except with drug lords shooting each other with ray guns instead of regular old guns.
User avatar
Stu Clarke
 
Posts: 3326
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:45 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:02 am

would you like a DLC down in Mexico

Mexico wouldn't survive a Nuclear Holocaust. I figure mexico's vault program is made out of wood. no nuclear plants, no metal door, no air, no water witch means no living mexicans. In fact mexicans would cross the border and try to get in one of the USA vaults.
User avatar
Andrew Tarango
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:07 am

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:52 pm

yes alaska was a computer simulation I know but mexico is in maybe from vegas at least a week or two away walking and did you hear of a train tracks would be their and as a fuel you could brun wood that woidn`t take long at all. by the way do you remember how you get to the pitt if their tracks then their has to be some at vegas and I will not lie the UK would be pretty cool.


Failure...You are failure.

Firstly, if you knew it was a computer simulation then you wouldn't of said that. Maybe? Obviously you have no clue how far apart Mexico and Vegas are. If you were to go to Tucson (right near Mexican border) from Las Vegas it would take about 7 hours. And that's using a car and going by roads/freeways without radiation and all kinds of hostile enemies out and about wanting to kill you along with set of mines and all that stuff. las Vegas to Tucson is 409.89 miles, walking briskly (because if you run, you'll only die tired) that would take 5.7 days, about 6. But then each of those days you'll have to sleep so now it'll take 7 days. Now we have to include the equipment we're caring (weapons, aid, etc.) so now it's probably going to take 14 - 21 days. Then you have roaming threats all around you (mines, mutated creatures, people that want to kill you, radiation, etc.) so basically it's going to be a lot longer based on how good your combat skills are (but this is realistic so taking out hundreds, even thousands, would be very unrealistic and if you even did do it I am going to guess it would take years) then you have to add stuff like radiation and mines, mines can probably be avoided and disarmed but if your explosives skills aren't very good you might get killed. Radiation without treatment would be deadly. Then you have no roads or freeways or anything any more so add about another year. So basically, it would probably take more than a decade to get to Mexico if you survive the whole trip in one piece.

The train tracks are only around in Vegas and that area so fail. And Pittsburgh and D.C. are not only in the same country but are right near each other. You failed...again. Oh and Europe is not UK, failure...
User avatar
Clea Jamerson
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:23 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:55 pm

Failure...You are failure.

Firstly, if you knew it was a computer simulation then you wouldn't of said that. Maybe? Obviously you have no clue how far apart Mexico and Vegas are. If you were to go to Tucson (right near Mexican border) from Las Vegas it would take about 7 hours. And that's using a car and going by roads/freeways without radiation and all kinds of hostile enemies out and about wanting to kill you along with set of mines and all that stuff. las Vegas to Tucson is 409.89 miles, walking briskly (because if you run, you'll only die tired) that would take 5.7 days, about 6. But then each of those days you'll have to sleep so now it'll take 7 days. Now we have to include the equipment we're caring (weapons, aid, etc.) so now it's probably going to take 14 - 21 days. Then you have roaming threats all around you (mines, mutated creatures, people that want to kill you, radiation, etc.) so basically it's going to be a lot longer based on how good your combat skills are (but this is realistic so taking out hundreds, even thousands, would be very unrealistic and if you even did do it I am going to guess it would take years) then you have to add stuff like radiation and mines, mines can probably be avoided and disarmed but if your explosives skills aren't very good you might get killed. Radiation without treatment would be deadly. Then you have no roads or freeways or anything any more so add about another year. So basically, it would probably take more than a decade to get to Mexico if you survive the whole trip in one piece.

The train tracks are only around in Vegas and that area so fail. And Pittsburgh and D.C. are not only in the same country but are right near each other. You failed...again. Oh and Europe is not UK, failure...

Oh get burned. :flamethrower: Pocketsand1o1
User avatar
Emma Louise Adams
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:33 pm

Oh get burned. :flamethrower: Pocketsand1o1


Okay. :shocking:

Oh, nevermind...lol.
User avatar
Adam Baumgartner
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:12 pm

Next

Return to Fallout: New Vegas