Does anyone else want a DLC with the ability to continue thr

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 3:09 pm

Really? This again? Ok well the easy solution is dont do the dam mission
I get what you guys that want this are saying, and is it possible? Sure, if obsidian had the time to basically plot out a dozen different ending worlds, which I imagine they would be so overjoyed to spend months on, I mean its not like they need to work on Skyrim or anything (sarcasm). Look guys, its not gonna happen, live with it.
User avatar
Luna Lovegood
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:45 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 2:54 pm

What would you get out of it that you can't get simply by not doing the final quest? The only thing I can think of is Lanius' helmet and sword. And LR makes that concern moot since you get even better versions of that gear in the divide.

Immersion? But is it really any more immersive if nothing of importance changes in the game world, compared to the battle not starting until you're ready? Really?

I mean, I wouldn't mind a post-ending expansion that had a significant amount of content. However, a DLC, as we saw with Broken Steel, simply doesn't have the budget to change much. And that's with FO3, where there was pretty much only one way to do things anyway, versus NV which has five primary endings and a whole lot of secondary location and/or quest based endings.



Except that "DLC" would end up having to be huge and expensive, simply because there's so many variables to keep track of in the ending. NCR/House/Legion/Yesman/Yesman anarchy, how you handled various minor factions and quests, etc. To compare, we only got to see the outcome of our actions in FO1 during FO2, simply because they were that far reaching. And the endings in FNV outdo those in FO1 in terms of what changes. A full on expansion is pretty much the minimum you'd need to do NV's endings justice.

BS in FO3 worked because of two reasons: The ending we got was stupid ([INT]Fawkes, you just helped me deal with an irradiated area two quests ago, etc etc), and the ending we got simply doesn't change all that much unless you put the virus in. And that option was watered down most heavily.

No, that's not entirely true - bringing water to DC should have totally changed everything, but that sort of change is outside the purview of a $10 DLC. It's too in depth to handle in so short a time.

Each of FNV's primary endings changes more than FO3's ending does, which means it's even less likely to work.

If you really want to see the results of your actions in the Mojave, petition Beth to get Obs back for FNV2.


So,... That would be a 'No' for this guy.
User avatar
lillian luna
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:43 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 9:25 am

The ending tells me everything there is to know so no, I don't need it. What I would like to see is Mojave 10 years after NV.
User avatar
Hayley O'Gara
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:53 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 2:39 am

So... while we are at it, I request a DLC Armor pack for Rex, since ED-E got so much love with LR. It would add a new set of armor for Rex and the ability to let us mount it. The DLC could be called Rex Armor Pack :tes: .

So...What do you guys think?? :obliviongate:
User avatar
Bigze Stacks
 
Posts: 3309
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 5:07 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 7:53 am

The ending of the game describes the distant future of the Mojave, so there is some room in there where nothing happens in the immediate future. And maybe whatever faction you sided with, it would be cool if you continued playing and if you did anything against that faction, that they'd assassinate you or something were you couldn't escape. .
Actually the endings mostly describe immediate to intermediate futures. Things that would be set in motion after the battle for Hoover Dam and see fruition within a year to two years.

Also after the battle for Hoover Dam you pretty much get the entire Mojave in to motion. Either the NCR goes to work annexing and fortifying the Mojave, The Legion moves into the Mojave taking over towns and driving the NCR ahead of them, House secures a bunch of sites while the NCR withdraws or the NCR retreats while the Courier tries to shape his new position of power. None of those really leave a lot of room where nothing happens.
User avatar
Mrs. Patton
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:00 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 3:55 am

-I would. If the story was aligned around politics, influencing House and setting his post NCR plans in motion/getting a call from victor a few months later after the dam from victor saying House had "need of an individual of my stripe" again. It could be trying to mend broken feelings, dodgeing NCR assassins, having Dean Domino show up in vegas and yourself setting up shop as a Casino / diner / Caravan / Enforcer / Protection / Banking / ect owner. Some of it I can get on Mods though so I prize myself lucky I am a pc owner so I can wring a few extra hours out of NV. If the story made sense... why not? However I can see if you are NCR or Legion that the palette would be a wee bit thinner. With yesman, you could almost have alien invasion and I wouldnt be surprised.... because if he was the canon choise, giant puddings from outer space makes sense too.
User avatar
Nick Tyler
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:57 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 9:31 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FopyRHHlt3M&feature=related

wolf
User avatar
Sarah Edmunds
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:03 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 1:52 am

No, and it has nothing to do with the foam at the mouth anger people around here get at the mention of 'playing after the ending'. My unwant is simply that if it came out in anything less than 6 months minimal, I'd know it'd be crap. I wouldnt want some DLC, I'd want a full on expansion pack, for House, NCR, Legion, and Indie players. I just don't see them being able to get the big name actors they had again soon just to voice this expansion pack. Would I like to see it? Yes, but ONLY under selective conditions.
User avatar
Fluffer
 
Posts: 3489
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:29 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 8:14 am

I totally agree with OP, I have yet to finish the game and I find it annoying you would have to avoid the Main quests,
Cos when you get to a point where you don't know what to do next, You are forced to roam around looking for side quests while you have the chance to do them,
I'd really like to see the after-effects of the main quest and have my quest log less clogged up for a change
User avatar
Shelby Huffman
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:06 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 11:15 am

No.

No.

and ummm no.

I swear if I see another one of these threads again I'm going to go insane, how [censored] hard it is to use the Search function.

I totally agree with OP, I have yet to finish the game and I find it annoying you would have to avoid the Main quests,
Cos when you get to a point where you don't know what to do next, You are forced to roam around looking for side quests while you have the chance to do them,
I'd really like to see the after-effects of the main quest and have my quest log less clogged up for a change

That made no sense, please try again.
User avatar
Darian Ennels
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:00 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 3:23 pm

I could go for an expansion pack similar to Dragon Age : Awakening. Same characters, down the road, slightly different setting, with a colossal amount of what you accomplished in the base game actually carrying over - at least verbally.

As others have said, a small ten dollar DLC that just goes "You won! Keep playing?" after the credits roll and just lets you clean up quests or stomp around in a new mini-area seems fruitless.

As an aside, Broken Steel wasn't nearly as bad as people are claiming. It doesn't remove the entire plot of Fallout 3, nor the Enclave's entire plot. A "Plan B : Revenge" or "Plan B : Clean up loose ends" from a major organization doesn't strike me as being all that far fetched. Either way, the Brotherhood goes on the offensive and the Enclave fights back, how is that anything short of a logical response to heavily arm kill teams going after your holdings?
User avatar
Jonny
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:04 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 2:33 am

Really? This again? Ok well the easy solution is dont do the dam mission
I get what you guys that want this are saying, and is it possible? Sure, if obsidian had the time to basically plot out a dozen different ending worlds, which I imagine they would be so overjoyed to spend months on, I mean its not like they need to work on Skyrim or anything (sarcasm). Look guys, its not gonna happen, live with it.

Well, they don't, because there not making Skyrim. :facepalm:

I'm sure that it won't happen, but yeah it be cool. I'd love to spend more time in New Vegas and I'm sure that a lot of you would to. Is it ever going to happen? No, it won't, but it would be nice
User avatar
Joanne
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 8:32 am

wow people..... so serious well i for one wouldn't mind playing after the ending :foodndrink:
User avatar
Heather beauchamp
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:05 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 2:34 am

I would like a dlc that lets me play afterwords, but they closed up the nv stuff so nothing else. Now I hope they don't make f4 with a closed ending, oi.
User avatar
Sammykins
 
Posts: 3330
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:48 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 10:20 am

However I can see if you are NCR or Legion that the palette would be a wee bit thinner. With yesman, you could almost have alien invasion and I wouldnt be surprised.... because if he was the canon choise, giant puddings from outer space makes sense too.
I'd argue that an independent Vegas conclusion would have more to do post Hoover Dam.
There's dealing with the political fallout of expelling the NCR, rise of raiders and bandits, the possibilities of forging alliances or taking over by force the towns and factions of the Mojave, etc...
You could even include a Yes-Man betrayal if it is to happen.

I totally agree with OP, I have yet to finish the game and I find it annoying you would have to avoid the Main quests,
Cos when you get to a point where you don't know what to do next, You are forced to roam around looking for side quests while you have the chance to do them,
I'd really like to see the after-effects of the main quest and have my quest log less clogged up for a change
I would like to see the after-effects of the main quest, but I think for that to be visible we'd have to skip the time line ahead a bit.
And it would be a ton of work to pull of for a DLC (or any game without picking one ending).

Your other point is non-sense, though. Part of the point of continuing after the main quest is so you can roam around finding things you missed. Which is something you can do just as well before finishing the main quest.
User avatar
Sakura Haruno
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:23 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 7:19 am

Of course, no Question.

It's so stupid that you cant play past the end.

But it is called "the end" for a reason
User avatar
Mashystar
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 9:07 am

I'm hoping Fallout: 3's story goes down that The LW did in fact sacrifice him/herself for the Capital Wasteland, because that's a good story. I'm seriously hoping Broken Steel would be considered non-canon (if it were ever to even be considered).

Every story has an ending, and I see no purpose in allowing gameplay after the MQ.

I am hoping this as well, it'd at least end Fallout 3 with the dignity it had (what little of it, it might have been to some eyes) taken away from it by BS. (Heh, BS? Yes, I think Broken Steel is quite that.)
User avatar
Pawel Platek
 
Posts: 3489
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 2:08 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 4:31 am

Plain an simple, you want to play after the battle for the dam.....get a PC :smile:


wolf
User avatar
Alister Scott
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:56 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 3:52 am

I dislike PC elitists who only think about themselves instead of sharing gaming with console players. Shame on you. All you do is starting a console war.
User avatar
SUck MYdIck
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:43 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 12:39 am

I dislike PC elitists who only think about themselves instead of sharing gaming with console players. Shame on you. All you do is starting a console war.
Sharing is caring, And I don't care!
User avatar
Kate Norris
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:12 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 1:07 pm

I dislike PC elitists who only think about themselves instead of sharing gaming with console players. Shame on you. All you do is starting a console war.

I'm not a PC elitist and just don't think about myself, I mod and give it away for free. If you want mods which btw it the only way to play after the dam then blame the manufacturer of you console not anyone else, they are the ones who hold it back.

Hey I have all the consoles and don't hate on any of them......an shame on you for not being upset with the people who hold back mods for consoles, cause it's not the folks who play on PC.


wolf
User avatar
Lance Vannortwick
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:30 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 1:45 am

If you wouldn't had trolled in the first place, you wouldn't got my comment. You started it. I'm out.
User avatar
Kim Kay
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:45 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 1:15 am

I didn't troll, don't confuse me with your intentions, I just stated the facts, no matter how much you don't like it.


wolf
User avatar
Lew.p
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 5:31 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 2:19 am

My P. told me that your C. lacked some points and it's probably why we clashed with words.
User avatar
Jack Walker
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:25 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 5:56 am

Only the 1's and 0's know for sure :thumbsup:



wolf
User avatar
Brian Newman
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:36 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout: New Vegas