No never. What are you trying to do ruin TES like they did to fable?
Why are there so many people making the assumption that such a feature would need to be implemented in such an asinine and moronic way as Fable III did it?
A realistic matchlock rifle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KTS8PQ06Qo
Don't quote me to disagree unless you watched the entire video.
Takes 20 seconds
minimum to reload, but the wound it creates is devastating. These rifles were around
800 years ago, the technology is that old. These were used towards the tail-end of the medieval times, being one of the big innovations. Though it was new, it was used alongside normal calvary and footsoldiers wielding swords and bows and such,a t this point it didn't outright replace the older methods of war. Given that the game is in a new era I couldn't feel strongly one way or another if a few matchlocks were put into the game, since I don't feel they would be out of place, so long as they were portrayed realistically. It shouldn't be "I HAEV GUN I OWN UUU PEW PEW" because these weapons did not work in such a way, I think a bowman fighting a matchlock rifleman would basically be an evenly matched fight.
To me, I think rifles could be propagated in such a way that they seem like the new "evil technology" of the era, used by mundane men with no grasp of magic.
Or the game could have none at all. I'm just saying I wouldn't feel strongly one way or another if a few matchlocks were implemented, so long as they are rare and not super OP.